Abstract
Rapid bioassessment (RBA) techniques for evaluating river health are now commonplace and there is much debate on the best methods that should be used. One of the important features of RBA is subsampling of large qualitative or semi-quantitative samples to reduce the costs associated with handling and identifying animals. In Australia, the Australian River Assessment System (known as “AusRivAS”) has been widely used since 1994 to monitor and assess river health. To test the efficacy of AusRivAS protocols, four live-sorting protocols, the standard Australian River Assessment Scheme (AusRivAS) and three suggested improvements, were evaluated in three habitat types and in clear and turbid rivers. The suggested improvements included using magnification during the live-sort process, separate sorting of coarse and fine fractions and increasing the amount of time or animals collected. There was no statistically significant difference between any of the trialed live-sort protocols in terms of the number of taxa collected compared to the number remaining, the community composition, the abundances of individual families collected, or the AusRivAS Observed/Expected taxa ratios. The lack of differences between the live-sort protocols suggests that technicians using the current standard AusRivAS protocols are able to effectively obtain a representative subsample of animals from the whole kick or sweep net qualitative sample. This has the advantage of cost savings because no retraining will be required, field procedures will remain uncomplicated and previous river health assessments will remain valid.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. J.: 2000, DISTLM: A FORTRAN Computer Program to Calculate a Distance-Based Multivariate Analysis for a Linear Model, Department of Statistics, University of Auckland.
Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F. and Furse M. T.: 1983, ‘The performance of a new biological water quality score based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites’, Water Res. 17, 333–347.
AWT: 2000, National River Health Program Toolbox Project: AusRivAS Protocol Development —Scoping Document, Report to Environment Australia, Canberra.
Barbour, M. T. and Gerritsen, J: 1996, ‘Sub-sample of benthic samples: A defence of the fixed-count method’, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 15, 386–391.
Belbin, L.: 1993, PATN Reference Manual, CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra.
Burns, A. and Ryder, D. S.: 2001, ‘Potential for biofilms as biological indicators in Australian riverine systems’, Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2, 53–64.
Chessman, B.: 1995, ‘Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index’, Austr. J. Ecol. 20, 122–129.
Chessman, B., Growns, I., Currey, J. Plunkett-Cole, N.: 1999, ‘Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers’, Freshwater Biol. 41, 317–331.
Clark, K. R.: 1993, ‘Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure’, Austr. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143.
Courtemanch, D. L.: 1996, ‘Commentary on the sub-sampling procedures used for rapid bioassessments’, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 15, 381–385.
Davies, P.: 1994, River Bioassessment Manual Version 1.0, National River Processes and Management Program, Monitoring River Health Initiative, LWRRDC, Canberra.
DePauw, N. and Van Hooren, G.: 1983, ‘Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium’, Hydrobiologia 100, 153–168.
DNR: 1997, Biological Monitoring and Assessment of Freshwaters Using Macroinvertebrates. Background Information, Sampling and Analytical Procedures, Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Rocklea, Qld.
EPA: 1998, Rapid Bioassessment of Victorian Streams —The Approach and Methods of the Environment Protection Authority, Publication no. 604, Environment Protection Authority, Melbourne.
Growns, J. E., Chessman, B. C., Jackson, J. E. and Ross, D. G.: 1997, ‘Rapid assessment of Australian rivers using macroinvertebrates: Cost and efficiency of 6 methods of sample processing’, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 16, 682–683.
Halse S. A., Scanlon, M. D. and Cocking, J. S.: 2002, Australia-Wide Assessment of River Health: Western Australia Bioassessment Report WA Final Report, Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report No. 7; Commonwealth of Australia and Department of Conservation and Land Management, Canberra and Wanneroo.
Humphrey, C. and Thurtell, L.: 1997, External QA/QC of MRHI Agency Sub-Sample and Sorting Procedures. In Development and Implementation of QA/QC Protocols for Sample Processing Components of the MRHI Agency Bioassessment Program, Land and Water Resources Research and Development, Canberra.
ISO: 1983, Water Quality: Methods of Biological Sampling —Handnet Sampling of Aquatic Benthic Macroinvertebrate. Draft ISO International Standard.
John, J.: 2000, A Guide to Diatoms as Indicators of Urban Stream Health; National River Health Program (Urban Sub-Program Report No. 7), LWRRDC Occasional Paper 14/99; Canberra; Australia.
Karr, J. R.: 1981, ‘Assessments of biotic integrity using fish communities’, Fisheries (Bethesda) 6, 21–27.
Kingsford, R. T.: 1999; ‘Aerial surveys as a measure of river and landscape and floodplain health’, Freshwater Biol. 41: 425–438.
Marchant, R.: 1989, ‘A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates’, Bull. Austr. Soc. Limnol. 12, 49–52.
Metzeling, L.: 2001; Australia-Wide Assessment of River Health: Victoria Bioassessment Report, Monitoring River Heath Initiative Technical Report No. 4; Commonwealth of Australia and Victoria Environment Protection Authority, Canberra and Melbourne.
Mount, T. and Humphrey, C.: 2001, WISE Database V2.2d: Users' Guide. Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist and Environment Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
Oberdorff, T., Pont, D., Hugueny, B. and Porcher J. P.: 2002, ‘Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of “river health” in France’, Freshwater Biol. 47, 1720–1734.
O'Connor, N. A., Lloyd, L. N. and Moore, S. J.: 1996, Evaluation of the National River Health Program, WATER ECOscience Report No. 56/96, Melbourne.
Office of the Commissioner for the Environment: 1988, State of the Environment Report 1988. Victoria's Inland Waters, Victorian Government, Melbourne.
Parsons, M., Thoms, M. and Norris, R.: 2002, Australian River Assessment System: AUSRIVAS Physical Assessment Protocol, Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report No. 22 Environment Australia, Canberra.
Raddum, G. G., Fjellheim, A. and Hesthagen, T.: 1988, ‘Monitoring of acidification by the use of aquatic organisms’, Verh. Int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol. 23, 2291–2297.
Resh, V. H. and Jackson, J. K.: 1993, ‘Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates’, in: D. M. Rosenberg and V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 195–233.
Roshier, D. A., Robertson, A. I. and Kingsford, R. T.: 2002, ‘Responses of waterbirds to flooding in an arid region of Australia and implications for conservation’, Biol. Conserv. 106, 399–411.
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.: 1989, Statistical Methods, 8th ed., Iowa State University Press.
Turak, E., Hose, G. and Waddell, N.: 2000, Australia-Wide Assessment of River Health: New South Wales Bioassessment Report, Monitoring River Heath Initiative Technical Report No. 2a; Commonwealth of Australia and NSW Environment Protection Authority, Canberra and Sydney.
Underwood, A.: 1997, Experiments in Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
US EPA: 1982, Standard Operating Procedures Vol. II, Environmental Biology Section Environmental Service Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia.
Vinson, M. R. and Hawkins, C. P.: 1996, ‘Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedure on comparisons of taxa richness and among streams’, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 15, 392–399.
Water and Rivers Commission: 1999, Testing a Protocol for Foreshore Assessment in Metropolitan Waterways, Water Resource Management Series No. WRM 13; Water and Rivers Commission, Perth.
Wright, J. F.: 1995, ‘Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters’, Austr. J. Ecol. 20, 181–197.
Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T. and Armitage, P. D.: 1993, ‘RIVPACS —a technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the U.K.’, Eur. Water Poll. Contr. 3, 15–25.
Zar, J. H.: 1984, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Growns, I., Schiller, C., O'Connor, N. et al. Evaluation of Four Live-Sorting Methods for Use in Rapid Biological Assessments Using Macroinvertebrates. Environ Monit Assess 117, 173–192 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-0231-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-0231-5