Skip to main content
Log in

Point Sampling Digital Imagery with ‘Samplepoint’

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring percent occurrence of objects from digital images can save time and expense relative to conventional field measurements. However, the accuracy of image analysis had, until now, not reached the level of the best conventional field measurements. Additionally, most image-analysis software programs require advanced user training to successfully analyze images. Here we present a new software program, ‘SamplePoint,’ that provides the user a single-pixel sample point and the ability to view and identify the pixel context. We found SamplePoint to allow accuracy comparable with the most accurate field-methods for ground-cover measurements. Expert use of the program requires minimal training and its ease of use allows rapid measurements from image data. We recommend SamplePoint for calibrating the threshold-detection level of image-analysis software or for making direct measurements of percent occurrence from digital images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramov, I. and Gordon, J.: 1994, ‘Color appearance: On seeing red- or yellow, or green, or blue’, Annual Review of Psychology 45, 451–485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, T. E.: 1962, Interpretation of Aerial photographs, Burgess, Minneapolis, MN, 192 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. T., Judd, T. S. and Adams, M. A.: 2000, ‘Close-range vertical photography for measuring cover changes in perennial grasslands’, Journal of Range Management 53, 634–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., Louhaichi, M. and Johnson, D. E.: 2004, ‘Lightweight camera stand for close-to-earth remote sensing’, Journal of Range Management 57, 675–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., Fifield, C., Phillips, M. and Williamson, N.: 2005a, ‘Image analysis compared with other methods for measuring ground cover’, Arid Land Research and Management 19, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E. and Johnson, D. E.: 2005b, ‘Detection-threshold calibration and other factors influencing digital measurements of bare ground’, Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E. and Berryman, R. D.: 2005c, ‘Precision measurements from very large scale aerial digital imagery’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 112, 293–307.

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., Meikle, T. W. and Fitzgerald, C.: 2005d, ‘The accuracy of ground cover measurements’, Rangeland Ecology and Management 59, 179–188.

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E.: 2006, ‘Very-large scale aerial photography for rangeland monitoring’, Geocarto International 21(3), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, W. W., Mitchel, J. E., Bonham, C. D. and Cook, J. W.: 1995, ‘Assessing the power of the point-line transect to monitor changes in plant basal cover’, Journal of Range Management 48, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. O. and MacLeod, D. I.: 1997, ‘Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors’, Curr Biol. 7, 844–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claveran, R. A.: 1966, ‘Two modifications to the vegetation photographic charting method’, Journal of Range Management 19, 371–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. W. and Stubbendieck, J.: 1986, Range research: Basic Problems and Techniques, Society for Range Management, Denver, CO. 317 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. S.: 1924, ‘An apparatus for photographic recording of quadrats’, Journal of Ecology 12, 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, R. P., Kinn, G., Light, D. and Mondello, C.: 1998, ‘Talking digital’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64, 1139–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crapper, P. F.: 1980, ‘Errors incurred in estimating an area of uniform land cover using landsat’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 46, 1295–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, D. L.: 1999, The Western Range Revisited: Removing Livestock from Public Lands to Conserve Native Biodiversity. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK. 388 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., Racher, B. J., Britton C. M. and Davis, M. R.: 2001, ‘Remote sensing of redberry juniper in the Texas rolling plains’, Journal of Range Management 54, 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel, M. H. and Shaw, K.: 1987, ‘Evaluation of methods for monitoring sparse patterned vegetation in arid rangelands. I. Herbage’, Journal of Environmental Management 25, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L.: 1995, ‘Effects of Categorization on Color Perception’, Psychological Science 6, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. R., Sharrow, S. H. and Johnson, D. E.: 1996, ‘Use of low-level remote sensing to understand tree/forage spatial interactions in agroforests’, Geocarto International 11(3), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Technical Team (ITT): 1996, Sampling Vegetation Attributes Interagency Technical Reference, Report No. BLM/RS/ST-96/002+1730. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management — National Applied Resources Science Center. Available at: http://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/pdf/samplveg.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov. 2005.

  • Johnson, D. E., Vulfson, M., Louhaichi, M. and Harris, N. R.: 2003, VegMeasure v.1.6 user's manual, Department of Rangeland Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 51 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E. B.: 1927, ‘Grasslands of New Zealand’, New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 34, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E. B. and Madden, E. A.: 1933, ‘The point method of pasture analysis’ New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 46, 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louhaichi, M., Borman, M. M. and Johnson, D. E.: 2001, ‘Spatially located platform and aerial photography for documentation of grazing impacts on wheat’, Geocarto International 16(1), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC): 1994, Rangeland health, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 180 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, M. K., Gardiner, H. G. and Norton, B. E.: 1985, ‘A photographic technique for repeated mapping of rangeland plant populations in permanent plots’, Journal of Range Management 38, 231–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. R. and Eddleman, L. E.: 1973, ‘A test of stereophotographic sampling in grasslands’ Journal of Range Management 26, 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, R. D. and Westfall, S. E.: 1973, ‘A simple stereophotographic technique for analyzing small plots’, Journal of Range Management 26, 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. D., Karcher, D. E. and Purcell, L. C.: 2001, ‘Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis’, Crop Science 41, 1884–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundt, P.: 2002, ‘The statistical power of rangeland monitoring data’, Rangelands 24(2), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. M., Gibbens, R. P. and Debano, L.: 1961, ‘Artificial populations for teaching and testing range techniques’, Journal of Range Management 14, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H.: 1970, ‘An evaluation of eight methods of botanical analysis on grasslands in Rhodesia’, Journal of Applied Ecology 7, 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. F.: 1971, ‘Measuring vegetation changes on fixed quadrats by vertical ground stereophotography,’ Journal of Range Management 24, 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Terrance Booth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Booth, D.T., Cox, S.E. & Berryman, R.D. Point Sampling Digital Imagery with ‘Samplepoint’. Environ Monit Assess 123, 97–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9164-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9164-7

Keywords

Navigation