Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND CONCERNS ABOUT A CONTAMINATED SITE IN A DENSELY POPULATED SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Considerable attention has been devoted to the concerns and perceptions of people residing around contaminated facilities, both brownfields in urban areas and others located in remote and lightly populated areas. This paper examines the concerns of recreationists and sportsmen residing near the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory, in central Long Island, one of the most densely populated regions in the United States, where tourism is of prime importance. On an open-ended question, the greatest concern was pollution, followed by environmental health as a global concern, and human health as a concern for Brookhaven. Accidents/spills, loss of public health, and loss of ecological health were rated highest among a list of concerns, and change in property values was rated lowest. When asked to rank seven concerns, protecting human health was ranked the highest, and economic interests were ranked the lowest. For future land use at Brookhaven, recreational uses were rated the highest, while building houses and factories, and storage of nuclear material were rated the lowest. These data can be used by managers, decision and policy makers, and the general public to assess and manage local and regional environmental concerns and to consider future land uses for decommissioned lands, such as those at Brookhaven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binney, S. E., Mason, R., Martsolf, S. and Detweiler, J. H.: 1996, ‘Credibility, public trust, and the transport of radioactive waste through local communities’, Environ. Behav. 28 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiko, P. R. L.Morrill, J., Flynn, E. M., Faustman, E. M., van Belle, G. and Omenn, G.: 1996, ‘Who holds the stakes? A case study of stakeholder identification at two nuclear weapons production sites’, Risk Anal. 16 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. S.: 1998,‘The great DOE land rush?’, Science 282 pp. 616–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 2000, ‘Risk, a comparison of on-site hunters, sportsmen, and the general public about recreational rates and future land use preferences for the Savannah River site’, J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 43 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2001, ‘Stewardship and the US Department of Energy: Encompassing ecosystem protection’, J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 44 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J. W. and Gochfeld, M.: 1997, ‘Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen’, Risk Anal. 17 313–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Roush, E. E., Ramos, R. and Gochfeld, M.: 2000a, ‘Risk perception, land use, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: Attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians’, Environ. Res. 83 298–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Roush Jr. D. D., Sanchez, J., Ondrof, J., Ramos, R., McMahon, M. J. and Gochfeld, M.: 2000b, ‘Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources, hazards, and future land use of people living near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory’, Environ. Monitor. Assess. 60 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J., Leschine, T. M., Greenberg, M., Karr, J., Gochfeld, M. and Powers, C. W.: 2003, ‘Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy’s Bomb factories: Protecting human and ecological health’, Environ. Manage. 31 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. T., Beck, R. D. and Rudel, R.: 1997, ‘Life years lost at hazardous waste sites: Remediation worker fatalities vs cancer deaths to nearby residents’, Risk Anal. 17 419–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. T.: 1994, This is New Jersey, Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1994, Stewards of National Resources, Department of Energy, Washington, DC, DOE/FM-0002.

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1996, Charting the Course: The Future Use Report, Department of Energy Washington, DC, DOE/EM-0283.

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 1999, From Clean up to Stewardship, Department of Energy Washington, DC, DOE/EM-0466.

  • Department of Energy: 2002a, About Brookhaven, http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/about-BNL.htm.

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 2002a, The Operable Unit V Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study, Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York.

  • Department of Energy (DOE): 2002b, Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (Operable Unit V. Peconic River), Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York.

  • Dillman, D. A.: 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E.: 1991, ‘Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues:1965–1990’, Soc. Natur. Res. 4 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish & Wildlife Service: 2003, Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Report 2001-1) Washington, DC.

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C.: 1994, ‘Decidedly different: Expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository’, Risk Anal. 6 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, J. H. and Oishi, S. M.: 1995, How to Conduct Interviews by Telephone and in Person, Vol. 4 of The Survey Kit, Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M., Solitare, L., Greenberg, M. and Lowrie, K.: 1998, ‘Regional economic benefits of environmental management at the US Department of Energy’s major nuclear weapons sites’, J. Environ. Manage. 54 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeuber, R.: 1996, ‘Setting the environmental policy agenda: The case of ecosystem management’, Nat. Res. J. 36 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, A. F., Leigh, J. P. and Planek, T. W.: 1994, ‘Estimated risk of occupational fatalities associated with hazardous waste site remediation’, Risk Anal. 14 1011–1017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki, M. and Kalimo, R.: 1993, ‘Risk perception among nuclear power plant personnel: A survey’, Risk Anal. 4 421–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, N. N. and Slovic, P.: 1988, ‘Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains’, Risk. Anal. 8 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., Easterling, D.Desvousges, W. and Slovic, P.: 1990, ‘Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada’, Risk Anal. 10 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, D. G., Slovic, P. and Malmfors, T.: 1999, ‘How exposed is exposed enough? Lay inferences about chemical exposure’, Risk Anal. 19 648–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T. M., Axelrod, L., Cavagh, N. S. and Slovic, P.: 1997, ‘Perception of ecological risk to water environments’, Risk. Anal. 17 341–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J.: 1992, ‘Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites’, Risk Anal. 1 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC): 1994, Building Consensus through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy’s Environmental Remediation Program, National Academy PressWashington DC.

  • National Research Council (NRC): 1995, Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE’s Environmental Management Program, National Academy of Sciences Press Washington, DC.

  • National Research Council: 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press Washington, DC.

  • National Research Council (NRC): 2001, Long-term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites, National Academy of Science Press Washington, DC.

  • Norse, E. A.: (ed.), 1993, Global Marine Biological Diversity Strategy: Building Conservation into Decision Making, Center for Marine Conservation Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management: 1997, Report of the Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Washington, DC, U.S. Congress: Presidential/ Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management.

  • SAS Institute: 1995, User’s Guide to SAS, SAS, Inc. Cary, North Carolina.

  • Slovic, P.: 1987, ‘Perception of risk’, Science 236 280–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S.: 1979, ‘Rating the risks’, Environment 21 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Kraus, N. N., Lappe, H., Letzel, H. and Malmfors, T.: 1989, ‘Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Sweden’, Pharm. Med. 4 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Layman, M. and Flynn, J.: 1991, ‘Lessons from Yucca Mountain’, Environment 3 7−11, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau: 2002, Suffolk county, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36103/html.

  • Westergaard, B.: 1998, New Jersey: A Guide to the State, Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Brown, S., Greenberg, M. and Kahn, M.: 1999, ‘Risk perception in context: The Savannah River stakeholder study’, Risk Anal. 22 1019–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Life Sciences, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, 604 Allison Road, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, U.S.A.

    JOANNA BURGER

Authors
  1. JOANNA BURGER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JOANNA BURGER.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURGER, J. ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND CONCERNS ABOUT A CONTAMINATED SITE IN A DENSELY POPULATED SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT. Environ Monit Assess 101, 147–165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9151-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9151-z

Keywords:

Search

Navigation