Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BASAL SOIL RESPIRATION RATE, TREE STAND AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS IN BOREAL FORESTS

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Soil respiration is considered to represent the overall microbial activity reflecting mineralisation of organic matter in soil. It is the most commonly used biological variable in soil studies. In long-term monitoring of forested areas, there is a need for reference values for soil microbiological variables in different forest ecosystems. In this study we describe the relationship between soil respiration rate, tree stand and humus chemical characteristics of boreal coniferous forests stands. Soil respiration rate was higher in pine dominated than in spruce dominated study sites when the result was calculated on dry matter bases. However, when calculated on area bases, the result was opposite and no difference was found when the soil respiration rate was calculated on organic carbon bases. Irrespective of the main tree species, the soil respiration rate was equal in different development classes but not equal in soil fertility classes, i.e. within forest site types based on differences in ground vegetation. Respiration rates were clearly higher in mesic sites when calculated on dry matter, Corg or area bases. However, soil respiration rate did not correlate with soil chemical variables indicating site fertility. Soil respiration rate on dry matter basis was at a lower level in the south and on more fertile sites, and on the other hand at a higher level in older stands and on sites with a thicker organic layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarnio, T. and Martikainen, P. J.: 1994, ‘Mineralization of carbon and nitrogen in acid forest soil treated with fast- and slow-release nutrients’, Plant Soil 164 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bth, E.: 1989, ‘Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations (a review)’, Water, Air Soil Pollut. 47 335–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajander, A. K.: 1949, ‘Forest types and their significance’, Acta For Fenn. 56 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish Forest Research Institute: 1985, Valtakunnan metsien 8. inventointi. Pysyvien koealojen kenttätyön ohjeet 1985–1986 (The 8th national forest inventory. Field instructions for permanent sample plots in 1985–1986). The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Dept. of Forest Inventory pp. 127 s. (in Finnish).

  • Halonen, O., Tulkki, H. and Derome, J.: 1983, ‘Nutrient analysis methods’, Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 121 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. M. and Howard, P. J. A.: 1993, ‘Relationships between CO2 evolution, moisture content and temperature for a range of soil types’, Soil Biol. Biochem. 25 1537–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurka, A.-M. and Starr, M.: 1997, ‘Relationship between decomposition of cellulose in the soil and tree stand characteristics in natural boreal forests’, Plant Soil 197 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurka, A.-M., Starr, M., Karsisto, M. and Salkinoja-Salonen, M.: 2001, ‘Relationship between decomposition of cellulose strips and chemical properties of humus layer in natural boreal forests’, Plant Soil 229 137--146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen, T., Perkiömäki, J., Kiikkilä, O., Vanhala, P., Neuvonen, S. and Fritze, H.: 1998, ‘Prolonged, simulated acid rain and heavy metal deposition: Separated and combined effects on forest soil microbial community structure’, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 27 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen, T., Liski, J., Bth, E., Kitunen, V., Uotila, J., Westman, C-J. and Fritze, H.: 1999, ‘Structure of the microbial communities in coniferous forest soils in relation to site fertility and stand development stage’, Microb. Ecol. 38 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. S. and Gupta, S. R.: 1977, ‘Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems’, Botan. Rev. 43 449–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamminen, P.: 2000, ‘Soil Factors’, in E. Mälkönen (ed), Forest Condition in a Changing Environment—The Finnish Case. Forestry Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht-Boston-London, pp.72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamminen, P. and Starr, M.: 1990, ‘A survey of Forest Soil Properties Related to Soil Acidification in Southern Finland’, in P. Kauppi, P. Anttila and K. Kenttämies (eds), Acidification in Finland, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala, P.: 2002, ‘Seasonal variation in the soil respiration rate in coniferous forest soils’, Soil Biol. Biochem. 34 1375–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala, P. and Ahtiainen, J.: 1994, ‘Soil respiration, ATP content and Photobacterium toxicity test as indicators of metal pollution in soil’, Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 9 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala, P., Kiikkilä, O. and Fritze, H.: 1996a, ‘Microbial responses of forest soil to moderate anthropogenic air pollution’, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 86 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala, P., Fritze, H. and Neuvonen, S.: 1996b, ‘Prolonged simulated acid treatment in the subarctic: Effect on the soil respiration rate and microbial biomass’, Biol. Fertil Soils 23 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala, P., Kapanen, A., Fritze, H. and Niemi, M.: 1998, ‘Microbial activity and biomass in four Finnish coniferous forest soils—spatial variability and effects of heavy metals’, Boreal Environ. Res. 3, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. VANHALA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VANHALA, P., TAMMINEN, P. & FRITZE, H. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BASAL SOIL RESPIRATION RATE, TREE STAND AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS IN BOREAL FORESTS. Environ Monit Assess 101, 85–92 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9134-0

Keywords:

Navigation