Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 121, Issue 1–3, pp 173–179 | Cite as

Toxic Metals in the Austrian Pine (Pinus Nigra) Bark in the Thrace Region, Turkey

  • Mahmut Coşkun


Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) bark was collected in thirty-seven localities in the Thrace region, Turkey, for the determination of airborne toxic metal distribution. Five toxic metals, As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn, were monitored using atomic absorption spectrometry. Distribution maps of toxic elements in the region were plotted according to Geographic Information System technology. In general, the concentrations of all investigated elements were not high in the region apart from the vicinity of big cities, Tekirdag, Istanbul and, close to Bulgarian border. However, the highest concentrations were not at pollution level. They have a similar distribution pattern throughout the region.


biomonitoring toxic metal pine bark atmospheric deposition lead 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Böhm, P., Wolterbeek, H., Verburg, T. and Musilek, L.: 1998, ‘The use of three bark for environmental pollution monitoring in the Czech Republic’, Environmental Pollution 102, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Čeburnis, D. and Steinnes, E.: 2000, ‘Conifer needles as biomonitors of atmospheric heavy metal deposition: Comparison with mosses and precipitation, role of the canopy’, Atmospheric Environment. 34, 4265–4271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harju, L., Saarela, K. E., Rajander, J., Lill, O. J., Lindroos, A. and Heselius, S. J.: 2002, ‘Environmental monitoring of trace elements in bark of Scots pine by thick-target PIXE’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 189, 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herpin, U., Berlek amp, J., Markert, B., Wolterbeek, B., Grodzinska, K., Siewers, U., Huhn, G., Schulz, G., Stärk, H. J., Tölle, R. and Schüürmann, G.: 1995, ‘Evaluation of regional heavy metal deposition by multivariate analysis of element contents in pine bark tree barks’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 84, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lieth, H. and Weckert, V.: 1996, ‘The distribution of heavy metals in a transect of the three states the Netherlands, Germany and Poland determined with the aid of moss monitoring’, The Science of the Total Environment 22, 1777–1792.Google Scholar
  6. Odukoya, O. O., Arowolo, T. A. and Bamgbose, O.: 2000, ‘Pb, Zn, and Cu levels in tree barks as indicator of atmospheric pollution’, Environment International 26, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Reis, M. A., Alves, L. C., Wolterbeek, H. Th., Verburg, T., Freitas, M. C. and Gouveia, A.: 1996, ‘Main atmospheric heavy metal sources in Portugal by biomonitor analysis’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics (Research B) 109–110, 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schulz, H., Popp, P., Huhn, G., Stärk, H. J. and Schüürmann, G.: 1999, ‘Biomonitoring of airborne inorganic and organic pollutants by means of pine tree barks. I. Temporal and spatial variations’, The Science of Total Environment 232, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Steinnes, E.: 1995, ‘A critical evaluation of the use of naturally growing moss to monitor the deposition of atmospheric metals’, Science of the Total Environment 160/161, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Türkan, I., Henden, E., Çelik, Ü. and Kıvılcım, S.: 1995, ‘Comparison of moss and bark samples as biomonitors of heavy metals in a highly industrialized area in Izmir, Turkey’, The Science of the Total Environment 166, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmut Coşkun
    • 1
  1. 1.Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations