Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 113, Issue 1–3, pp 49–69 | Cite as

Collaborative Science, Policy Development and Program Implementation in the Transboundary Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Ecosystem

  • David A. Fraser
  • Joseph K. Gaydos
  • Erik Karlsen
  • Michael S. Rylko
Article

Abstract

The transboundary Georgia Basin Puget Sound ecosystem is situated in the southwest corner of British Columbia and northwest comer of Washington State. While bountiful and beautiful, this international region is facing significant threats to its marine and freshwater resources, air quality, habitats and species. These environmental challenges are compounded by rapid population growth and attendant uiban sprawl. As ecosystem stresses amplified and partnerships formed around possible solutions, it became increasingly clear that the shared sustainability challenges in the Georgia Basin and Puget Sound required shared solutions. Federal, state and provincial institutional arrangements were made between jurisdictions, which formalized small scale interest in transboundary management of this ecosystem. Formal agreements, however, can only do so much to further management of an ecosystem that spans international boarders. A transboundary regional research meeting, the 2003 GB/PS Research Conference, opened the doors for large-scale informal cross-boarder cooperation and management. In addition to cooperation, continued efforts to stem toxic pollution, contain urban growth, and protect and restore ecosystems, require a commitment from scientists, educators and policy makers to better integrate research and science with decision-making.

Keywords

Georgia Basin governance population growth puget sound regional partnerships science in support of decision-making sustainability transboundary institutions urban sprawl 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alper, D. K., Doug, J. and Bob, M.: 1990, Transborder Environmental Issues in the British Columbia-Washington International Region: A Joint Seminar Between Canadian Studies Students at Western Washington and University of Washington, University Publishing Services, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Alper, D. K.: 1997, ‘Transboundary environmental relations in British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest Canada’, Amer. Rev. Can. Studies, 359–383.Google Scholar
  3. Artibise, A. and Hill, J.: 1993, ‘Governance and Sustainability in the Georgia Basin: A Report Commissioned by the BC Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy’, Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, J., Hules, D., Gregory, S., White, D., van Sickle, J., Berger, P. A., Dole, D. and Schumaker, N. H.: 2004, ‘Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin’, Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 14, 313–324.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, M. L.: 1974, ‘Water Resources and Land Uses Strait of Georgia-Puget Sound Basin’, Department of Environment, Lands Directorate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Bearden, D. M.: 2001, ‘National Estuary Program: A Collaborative Approach to Protecting Coastal Water Quality’, U.S. Congressional Research Service Report, Washington, D.C, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Boei, W.: 2002, Ship Emissions on the Rise: Poison in the Air’, Vancouver Sun Special Report, Vancouver British Columbia, November 30, 2002, A10 p.Google Scholar
  8. Boothroyd, J.: 1998, ‘Driving ourselves sane: The push is on to convince hundreds of thousands of car-loving city dwellers to put their automobile addiction in reverse’, Can. Geog., 118(4), 55–66.Google Scholar
  9. British Columbia Ministry of Municipal Affairs: 1995, ‘An Explanatory Guide to BC's Growth Strategies Act’, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection: 2002, ‘Environmental Trends in British Columbia’, Biennial Report, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. British Columbia Round Table on the Environment and the Economy: 1993a, ‘Georgia Basin Initiative: Creating a Sustainable Future’, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. British Columbia Round Table on the Environment and the Economy: 1993b, ‘State of Sustainability: Urban Sustainability and Containment’, Victoria, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. British Columbia/Washington State Marine Science Panel: 1994, ‘The Shared Marine Waters of British Columbia and Washington: A Scientific Assessment of Current Status and Future Trends in Resource Abundance and Environmental Quality in the Strait of Juan De Fuca, Strait of Georgia, and the Puget Sound.’ Report to the British Columbia-State of Washington Environmental Cooperation Council, Olympia, Washington and Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment: 1996, ‘A Framework for Developing Ecosystem Health Goals, Objectives and Indicators: Tools for Ecosystem-Based Management’, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
  15. Cannings, R. and Cannings, S.: 1996, British Columbia: A Natural History, Greystone Press, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Coastal Zone Canada Association: 1998, ‘Coastal Communities in the 21st Century: Sharing our Experience-Building our Knowledge’, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Cruickshank, J.: 1998, ‘Fate of the Strait-In Our Hands’, Vancouver Sun – Fate of the Strait Series, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1.Google Scholar
  18. Curran, D. and Leung, M.: 2000, ‘Smart Growth: A Primer’, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Dale, N., Emmett, B., Haggarty, J., Harper, J. and Paul, J.: 1997, ‘An Overview of Key Conservation, Recreation and Cultural Heritage Values in British Columbia's Marine Environment’, Prepared for the British Columbia Land Use Coordination Office, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Dovetail Consulting: 1996 ‘Puget Sound/Georgia Basin International Task Force Workshop: Strategic Planning in the Shared Waters - Workshop Summary’, Report prepared for the Georgia Basin/Puget Sound International Task Force, Witerock, British Columbia, March 28–29, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Droscher, T. W. and Fraser, D. A. (eds.): 2004, Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference, Available at CD-ROM or at http://www.psat.wa.gov/03proceedings/start.htm.
  22. Dunagan, C.: 2004, ‘Dead Zone Sucks Hope for Recovery: Oxygen Levels Remain Deadly to Sealife in the Southern End of Hood Canal’, The Sun Link.com Available at http://www.thesunlink.com/redesign/2004-03-13/local/424140.shtml Accessed 23/03/04.
  23. Dunson, K.: 2000, ‘President Clinton's Signature Says our Rainforests of the Sea Are a Priority’, in: Sounds and Straits, Vol. 10, No. 4., People for Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Environment Canada: 1996a, The Ecosystem Approach: Getting Beyond the Rhetoric, Hull, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Environment Canada: 1996b, Ecosystem Initiatives: Canadians Working Together-Strategic Overview, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Environment Canada: 1998a, Fraser River Action Plan Introduction, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Environment Canada: 1998b, Fraser River Action Plan – Forest Industries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Environment Canada: 1998c, Fraser River Action Plan – Urban Issues, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Environment Canada-British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks: 1992, The Lower Fraser Basin: A State of the Environment Synopsis, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Environment Canada-British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks: 1998a, ‘Clearing the Air: Action Facts’, Document Prepared for the Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative Public Launch, December 11, 1998.Google Scholar
  31. Environment Canada-British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks: 1998b, ‘Preserving Clean Water: Action Facts’, Document Prepared for the Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative Public Launch, December 11, 1998.Google Scholar
  32. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service: 2000, Marine and Estuarine Birds of the Georgia Basin, Delta, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Environment Canada, Pacific and Yukon Region: 1998, A Cooperative Approach to Sustainability in the Georgia Basin, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Environmental Protection Agency: 1989, Saving Bays and Estuaries: A Primer for Establishing and Managing Estuary Programs, Washington, D.C, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Environmental Protection Agency: 1997, Community-Based Environmental Protection: A Resource Book for Protecting Ecosystems and Communities, Washington, D.C, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Fisheries and Oceans Canada: 1998, Wild, Threatened, Endangered and Lost Streams of the Lower Fraser Valley-Summary Report Prepared for the Fraser River Action Plan, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Fraser Basin Council: 1997, Charter for Sustainability, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Fraser Basin Council: 2000, Annual Report and Financial Statement 1999–2000, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  39. Fraser Basin Council: 2001, Sustainability Indicators for the Fraser Basin-Consultation Report, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Fraser Basin Management Board: 1995, State of the Fraser Basin: Assessing Progress towards Sustainability, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  41. Fraser River Action Plan: 1993, Towards an Ecosystem Approach in B.C.: Results of a Workshop on Ecosystem Goals and Objectives, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  42. Fraser River Action Plan: 1995, The Fraser River Action Plan: 1994–1995, Progress Report, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  43. Gaydos, J. K. and Gilardi, K. V. K.: 2003: ‘Species of Concern in the Georgia Basin-Puget Sound Marine Ecosystem: More Support for a Transboundary Ecosystem Approach to Marine Conservation’, in Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference, March 31-April 3, 2003, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  44. Gaydos, J. K. and Karlsen, E.: 2003, ‘Securing a Sustainable Future for the Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Region’, in Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference, March 31-April 3, 2003, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  45. Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative: 1999, ‘1999 Progress Report’, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative: 2000, Action Plan Highlights 2000–2001, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  47. Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative: 2000, ‘2000 Progress Report’, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  48. Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative: 2001, Action Plan Highlights 2001–2002, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
  49. Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative: 2003, Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative – A Five-Year Perspective, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  50. Georgia Basin Action Plan: 2003, The Georgia Basin Action Plan: Highlights 2003–2008, Vancouver, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  51. Georgia Basin/Puget Sound International Task Force: Undated ‘Pathways to Our Optimal Future: A Five Year Review of the Activities of the International Task Force’, Victoria, British Columbia and Olympia, Washington. Available at http://www.psat.wa.gov/shared/pdfs/ December 1 f.al in sequenc.pdf Accessed 19/11/04.
  52. Government of Canada: 2000: Learning from Nature: Canada- The Ecosystem Approach to Integrated Land Management. Monograph No. 13, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  53. Greater Vancouver Regional District: 1996, Livable Region Strategic Plan' Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  54. Hammond, A.: 1998, Which World? Scenarios for the 21st Century: Global Destinies, Regional Choices, Island Press/Shearwater Books, Washington, D.C, USA.Google Scholar
  55. Harms, B., Knaapen, J. P. and Rademakers, J. G.: 1993, ‘Landscape Planning for Nature Restoration: Comparing Regional Scenarios’, in: C. Vos and P. Opdam (eds), Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment, Chapman & Hall, London, England.Google Scholar
  56. Hildebrand, L. P., Pebbles, V. and Fraser, D. A.: 2002: ‘Cooperative ecosystem management across the Canada-US boarder: approaches and experiences of transboundary programs in the Gulf of Maine, Great Lakes and Georgia Basin, Puget Sound’, Ocean Coast Manage. 45, 421–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hulse, D., Gregory, S. and Baker, J. (eds): 2002, Willamette River Basin Planning Atlas: Trajectories of Environmental and Ecological Change, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  58. Hume, S.: 2000, ‘The Fraser River: BC's Soul’ Vancouver Sun: Fate of the Strait Series, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November 1, 2000, C2.Google Scholar
  59. Kerfoot, Barbara and Will Thomas: 1995, Preserving our Common Waters: Initiatives in the Georgia Basin, Victoria, B.C, Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Litke, S.: 1994. Greening Our Cities Conference – Sustainable Urban Communities in the Vancouver Region – Towards Ecological Limits, Social Justice and Sustainable Livelihoods, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  61. McClure, R.: 2002, ‘Our Troubled Sound: In Busy Shipping Lanes, Threat of Big Oil Spill Looms’, in: Seattle Post Intelligencer, Seattle, Washington, USA, p. 16.Google Scholar
  62. McHarg, I.: 1969, Design with Nature, American Museum of Natural History Press, Garden City, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  63. Mills, C. E. and Rawson, K.: 2004, ‘Outlook grim for North Pacific Rockfish: Rockfish Symposium, Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, U.S.A., September 25–26’, Fish Fisheries 5, 178–180.Google Scholar
  64. National Parks and Conservation Program: 1994, ‘Nature Has No Borders... A Conference on the Protection and Management of the Northern Cascades Ecosystem: March 25–27, 1994’, Peanut Butter Publishing, University of Washington, Seattle Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  65. Nelson, Paul and S. Graham: 2004, ‘Assembling and Presenting Watershed Process Models for Evaluating Future Land Use’, in: T. W. Droscher and D.A. Fraser (eds) Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference, Available at CD-ROM or at http://www.psat.wa.gov/03proceedings/start.htm.
  66. Nichols, B.: 2002, Wave of the Future Orca Pass International Stewardship Area, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  67. Northwest Environment Watch: 2002, This Place on Earth 2002 – Measuring What Matter, Seattle, Washington, USA available at http://www.northwestwatch.org/publications/tpoe02.asp. Accessed 19/11/04.
  68. Northwest Environmental Watch: 2004, Cascadia Scorecard: Seven Key Trends Shaping the Northwest. Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  69. Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative: 2002, ‘Northwest Straits News’ Vol. 1, Issue 1, Mount Vernon, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  70. Ogilvy J. A.: 2002 Creating Better Futures: Scenario Planning as a tool for a Better Tomorrow, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  71. Port of Seattle: 2004, ‘Economic Impact: Creating Economic Vitality Here’, available at http://www.portseattle.org/business/economicdevelopment/economicimpact.sstml. Accessed 27/10/2004.
  72. Port of Vancouver: 2004, ‘The Port and Operations’, available at http://www.portvancouver.com/theport/economicimpact.htm1. Accessed 27/10/2004.
  73. Puget Sound Action Team: 2000, Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan, Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  74. Puget Sound Action Team: 2002a, Puget Sound's Health 2002, Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  75. Puget Sound Action Team: 2002b, Puget Sound Update 2002, Eighth Report of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program, Olympia, Washington, USA, 96 p.Google Scholar
  76. Puget Sound Action Team: 2004a, Mission – Protect and Restore Puget Sound, Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  77. Puget Sound Action Team: 2004b, ‘Growth management programs in puget sound’, available at http://www.psat.wa.gov/Programs/Growth.htm.
  78. Rothaus, D. and Friedman, C.: 2003, ‘Trends in pinto abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) abundance in the San Juan Islands and management of abalone in Washington State’, J. Shellfish Res. 22, 851–852.Google Scholar
  79. Save the Georgia Strait Alliance: 1991, ‘The State of the Strait’, in: Proceedings of a Conference on the Health of the Georgia Strait, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  80. Sloan, N. A.: 2004, ‘Northern abalone: Using an invertebrate to focus marine conservation ideas and values’, Coastal Manage. 32, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stiffler, L. and McClure, R.: 2002, ‘Our Troubled Sound: Unbalanced Ecosystem Imperils Rich Web of Life’, in: Seattle Post Intelligencer A7.Google Scholar
  82. Stouder, J., Bisson, P. and Naiman, R. (eds): 1997, Pacific Salmon and Their Ecosystems; Status and Future Options, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  83. Thomas, R.: 1992, ‘Saving the Strait, Saving Ourselves’, in: A Report on Georgia Strait, Revised edition, Save the Georgia Strait Alliance. Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  84. Transboundary Georgia Basin-Puget Sound Environmental Indicators Working Group: 2001, ‘Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Ecosystem Indicators Report’, Georgia Basin Ecosystem Initiative and Washington State Department of Ecology, Vancouver, British Columbia and Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  85. Twitchell, M.: 1989, ‘Implementing the US-Canada Pacific Salmon Treaty: The struggle to move from “fish wars” to cooperative fishery management’, Ocean Develop. Inter. Law 20, 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. United Nations Environment Program: 2001, ‘Global Environment Outlook 3: Past, Present and Future Perspectives Synthesis’, available http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3/english/pdfs/synthesis.pdf. Accessed 19/11/04.
  87. United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security: 2004, ‘Update # 10-Dalco Passage Spill Cleanup Continues’, available at https://www.piersystem.com/external/index.cfm?cid=21&fuseaction=EXTERNAL.docview&documentID=55682. Accessed 20/10/2004.
  88. Vancouver Sun Editorial: 1998, ‘An Environmental SOS for the Strait of Georgia’, in: Vancouver Sun, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, p. A22.Google Scholar
  89. Washington Sea Grant: 2002, ‘Marine Events Calendar 2002, April, May, June’ University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. USA. No page numbers.Google Scholar
  90. Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development: 1997, ‘Growth Management: It's Beginning to Take Shape’, Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  91. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: 2000 ‘Changing Our Water Ways: Trends in Washington's Water System,s’ Prepared by the Washington State, Department of Natural Resources under Commissioner of Public Lands Jennifer Belcher, Olympia, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  92. Washington State Governor's Sustainable Washington Advisory Panel: 2003, ‘A New Path Forward: Action Plan for a Sustainable Washington’, in: Achieving Long-Term Economic, Social, and Environmental Vitality, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
  93. White, J. and Banfield, K. (eds): 1996, Proceedings from Our Living Estuary: The Puget Sound Habitat Conference', September 28, 1996, Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  94. Whitfield, Paul H., David, A. Fraser and Stewart, C.: 2003 ‘Climate change impacts on water in Georgia Basin/Puget sound-special issue’, Can. Water Resources J. 28(4), 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson, R. C. H., Beamish, R. J., Aitkens, F. and Bell, J.: 1994, ‘Review of the Marine Environment and Biota of the Strait of Georgia, Puget Sound and Juan De Fuca Strait’, in: Proceedings of the BC/Washington Symposium on the Marine Environment, January 13–14, 1994. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1948, 390 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Fraser
    • 1
  • Joseph K. Gaydos
    • 2
  • Erik Karlsen
    • 3
  • Michael S. Rylko
    • 4
  1. 1.International and Intergovernmental AffairsEnvironment CanadaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.The SeaDoc SocietyUC Davis Wildlife Health Center – Orcas Island OfficeEastsoundUSA
  3. 3.VictoriaCanada
  4. 4.Office of EcosystemsTribal and Public AffairsSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations