Air Quality Improvement Estimation and Assessment Using Contingent Valuation Method, A Case Study in Beijing


The aim of the paper is to estimate and assess residents' willingness to pay to improve air quality in the urban area of Beijing using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The mean willingness to pay (WTP) for a 50% reduction of harmful substances in the air was 143 CNY per household per year, and the total WTP of the residents in the study area was 336 million CNY per year. As a proportion of household annual income, the mean WTP amounted to 0.7%. Four socio-economic variables were found to have significant impacts on residents' willingness to pay. The analysis results illustrated that WTP increases with income and education level, and decreases with household population and age. The willingness was larger for residents in the urban districts than those in the suburban districts. It was found that most of the protest bids lay on interviewees' incomplete perception of the values of environmental amenity. The influence of household income on people's willingness to pay illustrated in this study reflects a causal force of Beijing's transition to market economy that households created to have disposable income are more likely to care about environmental quality. The results of this study strike an optimistic note on the possibility of measuring the total economic value of environmental quality improvement by using the CVM in China. Suggestions on implication of the CVM for both academics and policy makers are provided in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Randner, R. and Schuman, H.: 1993, ‘Report of NOAA panel on contingent valuations, in: U.S. Federal Register, 10, USA, pp. 4601–4614.

  2. Beijing Statistical Bureau: 2000, Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 1999, Chinese Statistical, Beijing (in Chinese).

  3. Beijing Statistical Bureau: 2001, Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 2000, Chinese Statistical, Beijing (in Chinese).

  4. Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O.: 2000, ‘Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden’, Appl. Econ. 32, 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carson, R. T.: 1991, ‘Constructed markets’, in: J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad (eds), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 121–162.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E. and Meade, N. E.: 2001, ‘Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 19, 173–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carson, R. T., Mitchell, R. C., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R. J., Presser, S. and Ruud, P. A.: 2003, ‘Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 25, 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond, P. A. and Hausman, J. A.: 1994, ‘Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?’, J. Econ. Perspect. 8, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanemann, M.: 1994, ‘Valuing the environment through contingent valuation’, J. Econ. Perspect. 8, 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hausman, J.: 1993, Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahneman, D. and Knetch, J. L.: 1992, ‘Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfactions’, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 22, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, Z. (ed): 1999, Introduction to Economics of Environment and Natural Resources, Higher Education, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T.: 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Portney, P. R.: 1994, ‘The contingent valuation debate: Why economist should care’, J. Econ. Perspect. 8, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard, C. B., Patricia, A. C. and Daniel, J. M.: 1995, ‘Contingent valuation’, in: W. B. Daniel (ed), The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Blackwell, USA, pp. 629–654.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard, D.: 1998, ‘The theory of the contingent valuation method’, Hume Pap. Public Policy 6, 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swanson, T. and Day, B.: 1999, ‘Valuing water quality in China: Purpose, approach and policy’, J. Environ. Sci. 11, 309–316.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, J. N.: 1994, Environmental Economics: Theory, Method, and Policy, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whittington, D.: 2002, ‘Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries’, Environ. Resour Econ. 22, 323–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia, G.: 1998, An Economic Estimation for Environmental Pollution Losses in China, China Environmental Science, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. J. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X.J., Zhang, W., Li, Y. et al. Air Quality Improvement Estimation and Assessment Using Contingent Valuation Method, A Case Study in Beijing. Environ Monit Assess 120, 153–168 (2006).

Download citation


  • air quality
  • contingent valuation method
  • environmental valuation
  • willingness to pay