Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving Efficiency Of Uncertainty Analysis In Complex Integrated Assessment Models: The Case Of The Rains Emission Module

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstact

Ever since the Regional Acidification Information and Simulation Model (RAINS) has been constructed, the treatment of uncertainty has remained an issue of major interest. In a recent review of the model performed for the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) programme of the European Commission, a more systematic and structured uncertainty analysis has been recommended. This paper aims at contributing to the scientific debate how this can be achieved. Because of its complex structure on the one hand and limited research resources (time, computational capacities) on the other hand a full-blown uncertainty analysis in RAINS is hardly feasible. Therefore, all types of uncertainty require more efficient ways for uncertainty analysis. With respect to parameter uncertainty, we propose to focus research efforts for uncertainty analysis on key parameters. Among different approaches to select key parameters that have been discussed in the literature screening methods seem to be particularly appropriate for complex, deterministic Integrated Assessment models such as RAINS. Surprisingly, in Integrated Assessment modelling for air pollution problems of screening design have not been taken up so far. As a case study we consider the emission module of RAINS. We show that its structure allows for a straightforward and effective screening procedure

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaheim, H. A. and Bretteville, C.: 2001, ‘Decision-making frameworks for climate policy under uncertainty’, CICERO Working Paper, 2001:2, Centre for International Climate Research (CICERO), Oslo, Norway.

  • Alcamo, J. and Bartnicki, J.: 1987, ‘A framework for error analysis of a long-range transport model with emphasis on parameter uncertainty’, Atmos. Environ. 21(10), 2121–2131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J. and Bartnicki, J.: 1990, ‘The uncertainty of atmospheric source-receptor relationships in Europe’, Atmos. Environ. 24A, 2169–2189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J., Shaw, R. and Hordijk, L. (eds.): 1990, The RAINS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, M., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z. and Schoepp, W.: 1999, ‘The RAINS model: A tool for assessing regional emission control strategies in Europe’, Poll. Atmos. 41–63.

  • Amann, M.: 2002, ‘Uncertainty treatment in integrated assessment modelling – some thoughts based on the conclusions of the tfiam workshop on “uncertainty treatment with integrated assessment models” at IIASA’, January 2002, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Amann, M., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., Mechler, R., Posch, M. and Schoepp, W.: 2004, ‘The RAINS model. Documentation of the model approach prepared for the RAINS peer review 2004’, IIASA Interim Report, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Amann, M.: 2005, ‘The RAINS model: Treatment of uncertainties’, paper presented at the workshop “Integrated Assessment Modelling for Air Pollution. A Seminar on the RAINS Methodology” of the UN(ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling, January 20–21, 2005, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • ApSimon, H. M., Warren, R. F. and Wilson, J. J. N.: 1994, ‘The abatement strategies assessment model – ASAM: Applications to reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions across Europe’, Atmos. Environ. 28, 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ApSimon, H. M., Warren, R. F. and Kayin, S.: 2002, ‘Addressing uncertainty in environmental modelling: A case study of integrated assessment of strategies to combat long-range transboundary air pollution’, Atmos. Environ. 36, 5417–5426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, B.: 1987, ‘Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty’, Water Res. Research 23, 1393–1442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bettonvil, B. W. M.: 1990, Detection of Important Factors by Sequential Bifurcation. Proefschrift, Tilburg University, Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettonvil, B. W. M. and Kleijnen, J.: 1996, ‘Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors: Sequential bifurcation’, Europ. J. Op. Res. 96, 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campolongo, F., Kleijnen, J. and Andrea, T.: 2000, ‘Screening methods’, in: A. Saltelli, K. Chan and E. M. Scott, (eds.), Sensitivity Analysis, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casman, E. A., Morgan, M. G. and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1999, ‘Mixed levels of uncertainty in complex policy models’, Risk Analysis 19, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofala, J. and Syri, S.: 1998, ‘Sulfur emissions, abatement technologies and related costs for Europe in the RAINS model database’, IIASA Interim Report, IR-98–35, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • European Commission: 2001a, ‘The Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme: Towards a Thematic Strategy for Air Quality’, COM(2001) 245 (final), Brussels.

  • European Commission: 2001b, ‘Directive 2001(81(EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on National Emissions Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants’, Official Journal of the European Commission, L 309/22.

  • European Commission: 2004, ‘Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model’, Draft Final Report for Commission Comment, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/cafe/pdf/rains_report_review.pdf (September 2005).

  • Fisher, B. E. A., Ireland, M. P., Boyland, D. T. and Critten, S. P.: 2002, ‘Why use one model? An approach for encompassing model uncertainty and improving best practise’, Environ. Mod. and Ass. 7, 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, H. C. and Patil, S. R.: 2002, ‘Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods‘, Risk Anal. 22(3), 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R.: 1990, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbert, S. and Kroeze, C.: 2003, ‘Uncertainty analysis in integrated assessment models for acidification’, in: J. Wesseler, H.-P. Weikard and R. D. Weaver (eds.), Risk and Uncertainty Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 198–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, C. A., Bailey, P. D., Biewald, B., Kuylenstierna, J. C. I. and Chadwick, M. J.: 1994, ‘Environmentally targeted objectives for reducing acidification in Europe’, En. Pol. 22, 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S.: 2001, ‘Sensitivity analysis, monte carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment’, Risk Anal. 21(4), 579–583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): 2002, ‘Uncertainty treatment in integrated assessment modelling’, Conclusions from a workshop held at IIASA in Laxenburg (Austria), 24–25 January 2002, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/~rains/index-old.html (December 2004).

  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): 2004, ‘The deposition- and critical loads-assessment (DEP) module’, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/~rains(index-old.html (December 2004).

  • Kann, A. and Weyant, J. P.: 2000, ‘Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy(economic policy models’, Environ. Mod. Ass. 5, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen, J. P. C.: 1995, ‘Sensitivity analysis and related analyses: A survey of statistical techniques’, Paper presented at the International Symposium SAMO95 (Theory and Applications of Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output in Computer Simulation), 25–27 September 1995, Belgirate, Italy.

  • Kleijnen, J. P. C., Bettonvil, B. W. M. and Persson, F.: 2003, ‘Finding the important factors in large discrete-event simulation: Sequential Bifurcation and its applications’, Center Discussion Paper, No. 2003-104, Tilburg University.

  • Kleijnen, J. P. C.: 2005, ‘An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis’, Europ. J. Op. Res. 164, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D. C. L., Puckett, K. J., Womg, J., Moran, M. D., Fenech, G., Jeffries, D. S., Olson, M. P., Whelpdale, D. M., McNicol, D., Mariams, Y. K. G. and Minns, K.: 1996, ‘An integrated acid rain Assessment Model for Canada using the RAISON for Windows System’, Paper presented at the ASAAQ Conference 1996, Seattle.

  • Ravetz, J. and Funtowicz, S. O.: 2002, ‘NUSAP: The management of uncertainty and quality in quantitative information’, http://www.nusap.net/sections.php?op/viewarticle&artid+14 (Sept. 2002).

  • Rypdal, K. and Flugsrud, K.: 2001, ‘Sensitivity analysis as a tool for systematic reductions in greenhouse gas inventory uncertainties’, Environ. Sc. Pol. 4, 117–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Chan, K. and Scott, E. M.: 2000, Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suutari, R., Amann, M., Cofala, J., Klimont, Z., Posch, M. and Schöpp, W.: 2001, ‘From Economic Activities to Ecosystem Protection in Europe. An Uncertainty Analysis of Two Scenarios of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model,’ EMEP CIAM(CCE Report 1(2001, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Suutari, R., Amann, M., Cofala, J., Klimont, Z. and Schoepp, W.: 2004, Uncertainty Analysis of Emission Estimates in the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model’, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Trocine, L. and Malone, L. C.: 2001, ‘An overview of newer, advanced screening methods for the initial phase in experimental design’, in: B. A. Peters, J. S. Smith, D. J. Medeiros, and M. W. Rohrer (eds), Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 169–178.

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: 1999, ‘Protocol to the 1997 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone’, http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/full%20text/1999%20Multi.e.pdf (October 2004).

  • Van Aardenne, J. A., Kroeze, C., Pulles, M. P. J. and Hordijk, L.: 2000, ‘Uncertainties in the calculations of agricultural N2O emissions in The Netherlands using IPCC Guidelines’, in: J. Van Ham, A. P. M. Baede, L. A. Meyer, and R. Ybema (eds), Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gases: Scientific Understanding, Control and Implementation, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 8–10 September 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 493–506.

  • Van Asselt, M. B. A.: 2000, Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk. The PRIMA Approach to Decision Support, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluijs, J. P.: 1997, Anchoring amid uncertainty. On the Management of Uncertainties in Risk Assessment of Anthropogenic Climate Change, CIF-Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. F. and ApSimon, H. M.: 1999, ‘Uncertainties in integrated assessment modelling of abatement strategies: Illustrations with the ASAM model’, Environ. Sc. Pol. 2, 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Silke Gabbert

Authors
  1. Silke Gabbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silke Gabbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabbert, S. Improving Efficiency Of Uncertainty Analysis In Complex Integrated Assessment Models: The Case Of The Rains Emission Module. Environ Monit Assess 119, 507–526 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9040-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation