Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 119, Issue 1–3, pp 83–96 | Cite as

Evaluating Ecological Indicators: Lakes In The Northeastern United States

Article

Abstract

We use data from a survey of several hundred lakes in the northeastern United States by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to illustrate an approach to identifying promising indicators of lake condition. We construct a hypothetical gold standard of water quality from the first principal component of 16 chemical variables measured in the lakes, and examine its associations with 71 candidate indicators based on measurements of human activity, birds, fish and zooplankton in the lakes or their watersheds. Nonparametric summaries of these associations – based on rank correlations and receiver-operating-characteristic curves – suggest that variables summarizing the extent of human disturbance are generally the strongest indicators. To the extent that our water-quality variable is a useful proxy for ecological condition, our results suggest that easily-obtained measures of human activity are at least as predictive as many of the harder-to-measure biological indicators that have been proposed.

Keywords

indicator monitoring ROC curve water quality zooplankton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, S. M. (ed): 2002, Biological Indicators of Ecosystem Stress, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, A. P., Whittier, T. R., Kaufmann, P. R., Larsen, D. P., O'Connor, R. J., Hughes, R. M., Stemberger, R. S., Dixit, S. S., Brinkhurst, R. O., Herlihy, A. T. and Paulsen, S. G.: 1999, ‘Concordance of taxonomic richness patterns across multiple assemblages in lakes of the northeastern United States’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, J. R., Peck, D. V. and Sutton, D. W. (eds): 1997, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Surface Waters: Field Operations Manual for Lakes, EPA/620/R-97/001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Bryce, S. A., Hughes, R. M. and Kaufmann, P. R.: 2002, ‘Development of a bird integrity index: Using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition’, Environ. Manage. 30, 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.: 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Carignan, R. and Steedman, R. J.: 2000, ‘Impacts of watershed perturbations on aquatic ecosystems’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57(Suppl. 2), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carignan, V. and Villard, M.-A.: 2002, ‘Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 78, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaloud, D. J. and Peck, D. V. (eds): 1994, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Integrated Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Surface Waters Resource Group, 1994 Activities, EPA/600/X-91/080, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EMSL, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  9. Cottingham, K. L. and Carpenter, S. R.: 1998, ‘Population, community, and ecosystem variates as ecological indicators: phytoplankton responses to whole-lake enrichment’, Eco. Appl. 8, 508–530.Google Scholar
  10. Cude, C. G.: 2001, ‘Oregon water quality index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37, 125–138.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, W. S. and Simon, T. S. (eds): 1995, Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Gergel, S. E., Turner, M. G., Miller, J. R., Melack, J. M. and Stanley, E. H.: 2002, ‘Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems’, Aquat. Sci. 64, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J.: 1982, ‘The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve’, Radiology 143, 29–36.Google Scholar
  14. Herlihy, A. T., Stoddard, J. L. and Johnson, C. B.: 1998, ‘The relationship between stream chemistry and watershed land cover data in the mid-Atlantic region, U.S.’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 105, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes, R. M.: 1995, ‘Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions’, in: W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, R. M., Howlin, S. and Kaufmann, P. R.: 2004, ‘A biointegrity index (IBI) for coldwater streams of western Oregon and Washington’, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133, 1497–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, R. M., Kaufmann, P. R., Herlihy, A. T., Kincaid, T. M., Reynolds, L. and Larsen, D. P.: 1998, ‘A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 1618–1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunsaker, C. T. and Carpenter, D. E. (eds): 1990, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Ecological Indicators, Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, L. E., Kurtz, J. C. and Fisher, W. S. (eds): 2000. Evaluation Guidelines for Ecological Indicators, EPA/620/R-99/005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  20. Klemm, D. J., Blocksom, K. A., Fulk, F. A., Herlihy, A. T., Hughes, R. M., Kaufmann, P. R., Peck, D. V., Stoddard, J. L., Thoeny, W. T. and Griffith, M. B.: 2003, ‘Development and evaluation of a macroinvertebrate biotic integrity index (MBII) for regionally assessing mid-Atlantic Highlands streams’, Environ. Manage. 31, 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kottferova, J., Korenekova, B., Breyl, I. and Nadaskay, R.: 1996, ‘Free-living animals as indicators of environmental pollution by chlorinated hydrocarbons’, Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 53, 19–24.Google Scholar
  22. Meybeck, M.: 1998, ‘Man and river interface: Multiple impacts on water and particulates chemistry illustrated in the Seine river basin’, Hydrobiologia 373–374, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murtaugh, P. A.: 1996, ‘The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators’, Ecol. Appl. 6, 132–139.Google Scholar
  24. Murtaugh, P. A.: 2003, ‘On detecting hump-shaped relationships in ecology: A bootstrap test for monotonicity’, Environmetrics 14, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD: 1982, Eutrophication of Waters. Monitoring, Assessment and Control. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. R Development Core Team: 2004, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-00-3, URL http://www.R-project.org.
  27. Ramsey, F. L. and Schafer, D. W.: 2002, The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis, 2nd ed, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Rusak, J. A., Yan, N. D., Sorners, K. M., Cottingham, K. L., Micheli, F., Carpenter, S. R., Frost, T. M., Paterson, M. J. and McQueen, D. J.: 2002, ‘Temporal, spatial, and taxo-nomic patterns of crustacean zooplankton variability in unmanipulated north-temperate lakes’, Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, E. P.: 2002, ‘Statistical considerations in the development, evaluation, and use of biomarkers in environmental studies’, in: S. M. Adams (ed), Biological Indicators of Ecosystem Stress, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 565–590.Google Scholar
  30. Stemberger, R. S. and Lazorchak, J. M.: 1994, ‘Zooplankton assemblage responses to disturbance gradients’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 2435–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan, T. J. and Cosby, B. J.: 1998, ‘Modeling the concentration of aluminum in surface waters’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 105, 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu, F.-L., Tao, S., Dawson, R. W., Li, P.-G. and Cao, J.: 2001, ‘Lake ecosystem health assessment: Indicators and methods’, Water Res. 35, 3157–3167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsOregon State UniversityOregonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityVirginiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations