Abstract
New Bedford Harbor (NBH), MA, is a Superfund site because of high polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations in the sediment. From April 1994 to September 1995, a remedial dredging operation (termed the “Hot Spot”) removed the most contaminated sediments (PCB concentrations greater than 4000μg/g) from the upper harbor. During remediation, a monitoring program assessed the potential environmental impacts to NBH and adjacent Buzzards Bay. The monitoring program was developed with input from federal, state, and local authorities. Site-specific decision criteria were established to assess net PCB transport, water column toxicity, and PCB bioaccumulation in blue and ribbed mussels (Mytilus edulis and Geukensia demissa, respectively). The remediation was completed without exceeding PCB net transport or acute toxicity effects specified in the decision criteria. In addition, PCB bioaccumulation in mussels during this time period was not significantly greater than pre- or post-operational measurements. The results indicated that approximately 14000 cubic yards of highly PCB contaminated sediment were permanently removed with minimal environmental effects. The lessons learned during this operation, as well as previous pilot studies at the site, will be used to make full-scale remedial efforts in NBH more efficient and environmentally protective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergen, B. J., Nelson, W. G. and Pruell, R. J.: 1993a, ‘Bioaccumulation of PCB congeners by blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) deployed in New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 1671–1681.
Bergen, B. J., Nelson, W. G. and Pruell, R. J.: 1993b, ‘Partitioning of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in the seawater of New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 938–942.
Bergen, B. J., Nelson, W. G., Quinn, J. G. and Jayaraman, S.: 2001, ‘Relationships among total lipid, lipid classes, and polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations in two indigenous populations of ribbed mussels (Geukensia demissa) over an annual cycle’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20(30), 575–581.
Calder, J. A.: 1986, ‘Marine environmental quality: NOAA's National Status and Trends Program’, in: Oceans ‘86 Conference Record. Marine Technical Society IEEE Cat. No. 86CH2363-0. Washington, DC, and Inst. Electrical Electronics Eng., Piscataway, New Jersey, pp. 1351–1354.
den Besten, P. J., Postma, J. F., Wegener, J. W. M., Keidel, H., Klink, A., Mol, J. and van de Guchte, C.: 2000, ‘Biological and chemical monitoring after pilot remediations in the delta of the rivers Rhine and Meuse’, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage. 3(3), 317–334.
Hauge, A., Konieczny, R. M., Halvorsen, P. O. and Eikum, A.: 1998, ‘Remediation of contaminated sediments in Oslo Harbour, Norway’, Wat. Sci. Technol. 37(6–7), 299–305.
Ko, F.-C. and Baker, J. E.: 2003, ‘Seasonal and annual loads of hydrophobic organic contaminants from the Susquehanna River basin to the Chesapeake Bay’, Marine Pollut. Bull. X, XX–XX.
Nelson, W. G., Bergen, B. J., Benyi, S. J., Morrison, G., Voyer, R. A., Strobel, C. J., Rego, S., Thursby, G. and Pesch, C. E.: 1996, ‘New Bedford Harbor Long-Term Monitoring Assessment Report: Baseline Sampling’, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division. EPA/600/R-96/097.
Nelson, W. G., Bergen, B. J. and Cobb, D. J.: 1995, ‘Comparison of PCB and trace metal bioaccumulation in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and the ribbed mussel, Modioulus demissus, in New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts’, Environ. Toxicol.Chem. 14, 513–521.
Nelson, W. G., Pruell, R. J. and Hansen, D. J.: 1994, ‘Monitoring plan and decision criteria for remediation of the second operable unit (“Hot spot”) at the New Bedford Harbor, MA, Superfund site’ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, NHEERL, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI.
Nelson, W. G. and Hansen, D. J.: 1991, ‘Development and use of site-specific chemical and biological criteria for assessing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project’, Environ. Manage. 15, 105–112.
Pesch, C. E. and Garber, J.: 2001, ‘Historical analysis, a valuable tool in community-based environmental protection’, Marine Pollut. Bull. 42(5), 339–349.
Schimmel, S. C., Morrison, G. E. and Heber, M. A.: 1989, ‘Marine complex effluent toxicity program: Test sensitivity, repeatability and relevance to receiving water toxicity’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8, 739–746.
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.: 1967, Statistical Methods, The Iowa University Press, Ames, IA.
Steuer, J. J.: 2000, ‘A Mass-Balance Approach for Assessing PCB Movement During Remediation of a PCB-Contaminated Deposit on the Fox River, Wisconsin’ USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 0–4245.
Thursby, G. B., Stern, E. B., Scott, K. J. and Heltshe, J.: 2000, ‘Survey of toxicity in ambient waters of the Hudson/Raritan estuary USA: Importance of small-scale variations’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19(11), 2678–2682.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1988, ‘Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to marine and estuarine organisms’, EPA/600/4-87/028. Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I: 1990, ‘Record of Decision Summary, New Bedford Harbor/Hot Spot Operable Unit, New Bedford, Massachusetts, April 6, 1990.
Vale, C., Ferreira, A. M., Micaelo, C., Caetano, M., Pereira, E., Madureira, M. J. and Ramalhosa, E.: 1998, ‘Mobility of contaminants in relation to dredging operations in a mesotidal estuary (Tagus Estuary, Portugal)’, Wat. Sci. Technol. 37, 25–31.
Voie, O. A., Johnsen, A. and Rossland, H. K.: 2002, ‘Why biota still accumulate high levels of PCB after removal of PCB contaminated sediments in a Norwegian fjord’, Chemosphere 46(9–10), 1367–1372.
Weston, D. P., Jarman, W. M., Cabana, G., Bacon, C. E. and Jacobson, L. A.: 2002, ‘An evaluation of the success of dredging as remediation at a DDT-contaminated site in San Francisco Bay, California, USA’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21(10), 2216–2224.
White, E. and Bolattino, C.: 1998, ‘Realizing Remediation: A summary of contaminated sediment remediation activities in the Great Lake Basin’, Great Lakes National Program Office, Environmental Protection Agency, Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/sediment/realizing/whitebook.pdf.
Whyte, D. C. and Kirchner, J. W.: 2000, ‘Assessing water quality impacts and cleanup effectiveness in streams dominated by episodic mercury discharges’, Sci. Total Environ. 260, 1–9.
Zarull, M. A., Hartig, J. H. and Maynard, L.: 1999, ‘Ecological benefits of contaminated sediment remediation in the Great Lakes basin’, Sediment Priority Action Committee. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, August 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergen, B.J., Nelson, W.G., Mackay, J. et al. Environmental Monitoring Of Remedial Dredging At The New Bedford Harbor, Ma, Superfund Site. Environ Monit Assess 111, 257–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8223-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8223-4