Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 111, Issue 1–3, pp 173–222 | Cite as

Spatial Extent Of Degraded Sediment Quality In Puget Sound (Washington State, U.S.A.) Based Upon Measures Of The Sediment Quality Triad

  • Edward R. Long
  • Margaret Dutch
  • Sandra Aasen
  • Kathy Welch
  • M. Jawed Hameedi
Article

Abstract

A survey was designed and conducted to determine the severity, spatial patterns, and spatial extent of degraded sediment quality in Puget Sound (Washington State, USA). A weight of evidence compiled from results of chemical analyses, toxicity tests, and benthic infaunal analyses was used to classify the quality of sediments. Sediment samples were collected from 300 locations within a 2363 km2 area extending from the US/Canada border to the inlets of southern Puget Sound and Hood Canal. Degraded conditions, as indicated with a combination of high chemical concentrations, significant toxicity, and adversely altered benthos, occurred in samples that represented about 1% of the total area. These conditions invariably occurred in samples collected within urbanized bays and industrial waterways, especially near the urban centers of Everett, Seattle, Tacoma, and Bremerton. Sediments with high quality (as indicated by no toxicity, no contamination, and the presence of a relatively abundant and diverse infauna) occurred in samples that represented a majority (68%) of the total study area. Sediments in which results of the three kinds of analyses were not in agreement were classified as intermediate in quality and represented about 31% of the total area. Relative to many other estuaries and marine bays of the USA, Puget Sound sediments ranked among those with minimal evidence of toxicant-induced degradation.

Keywords

Puget Sound sediment quality triad weight of evidence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APHA: 1996, ‘P450 Reporter Gene Response to Dioxin-Like Organics. Method 8070’, in: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed., Supplement, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
  2. ASTM: 1993, Standard Guide for Conducting Solid Phase, 10-Day, Static Sediment Toxicity Tests with Marine and Estuarine Infaunal Amphipods, ASTM E 1367-92, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p. 24.Google Scholar
  3. ASTM: 1997, ‘E 1853-96 Standard Guide for Measuring the Presence of Planar Organic Compounds Which Induce CYP1A, Reporter Gene Test Systems’, in: Biological Effects and Environmental Fate; Biotechnology; Pesticides, 1997 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 11.05, Water and Environmental Technology, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1392–1397.Google Scholar
  4. Bay, S. M.: 1996, ‘Sediment Toxicity on the Mainland Shelf of the Southern California Bight in 1994’, in: SCCWRP Annual Report 1994–1995, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Westminster, CA, pp. 128–137.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, D. S., Ginn, T. C., Landolt, M. L. and Powell, D. B.: 1987, ‘Hepatic lesions in English sole (Parophrys vetulus) from Commencement Bay, Washington (USA)’, Mar. Environ. Res. 23, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton, G. A.: 1992, Sediment Toxicity Assessment, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, p. 457.Google Scholar
  7. Carr, R. S.: 1998, ‘Sediment Porewater Testing’, in: L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg and A. D. Eaton (eds.), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Section 8080, 20th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, R. S. and Chapman, D. C.: 1995, ‘Comparison of methods for conducting marine and estuarine sediment porewater toxicity tests – extraction, storage, and handling techniques’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 28, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, P. M.: 1996, ‘Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data’, Ecotoxicology 5, 327–339.Google Scholar
  10. Fairey, R., Roberts, C., Jacobi, M., Lamerdin, S., Clark, R., Downing, J., Long, E., Hunt, J., Anderson, R., Newman, J., Stephenson, M. and Wilson, C.: 1998, ‘Assessment of sediment toxicity and chemical concentrations in the San Diego Bay region, California, USA’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17(8), 1570–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyland, J. L., Balthis, W. L., Hackney, C. T. and Posey, M.: 2000, ‘Sediment quality in North Carolina estuaries: An integrative assessment of sediment contamination, toxicity, and condition of benthic infauna’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recovery 8, 107–124.Google Scholar
  12. Lauenstein, G. G. and Cantillo, A. Y. (eds.): 1993, ‘Sampling and analytical methods of the National Status and Trends Program National Benthic Surveillance and Mussel Watch projects 1984–1992’, NOAA Technical Memo, NOS ORCA 71, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  13. Llansó, R. J., Aasen, S. and Welch, K.: 1998a, Marine Sediment Monitoring Program. I. Chemistry and Toxicity Testing 1989–1995, Technical Report, Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Investigations and Laboratory services Program, Olympia, Washington, p. 101 + appendix.Google Scholar
  14. Llansó, R. J., Aasen, S. and Welch, K.: 1998b, Marine Sediment Monitoring Program. II. Distribution and Structure of Benthic Communities in Puget Sound 1989–1995, Technical Report, Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Investigations and Laboratory services Program, Olympia, Washington, p. 114 + appendix.Google Scholar
  15. Long, E. R.: 1982, ‘An assessment of marine pollution in Puget Sound’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 13(11), 380–383.Google Scholar
  16. Long, E. R.: 1987, ‘Biological Indicators of Pollution in Puget Sound’, in: Puget Sound: Issue, Resources, Status, and Management, NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series No. 8, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  17. Long, E. R.: 2000a, ‘Spatial extent of sediment toxicity in U.S. estuaries and marine bays’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 64, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Long, E. R.: 2000b, ‘Degraded sediment quality in U.S. estuaries: A review of magnitude and ecological implications’, Ecol. Appl. 10(2), 338–349.Google Scholar
  19. Long, E. R. and Chapman, P. M.: 1985, ‘A sediment quality triad: Measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 16(10), 405–415.Google Scholar
  20. Long, E. R., Chapman, P. M., Dexter, R. N. and Kocan, R. M.: 1985, ‘An Overview of Biological Effects Testing in Puget Sound, Washington: Methods, Results, and Implications’, in: Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium, Special Technical Publication 854, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 344–363.Google Scholar
  21. Long, E. R., Mac Donald, D. D., Smith, S. L. and Calder, F. D.: 1995, ‘Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments’, Environ. Manage. 19(1), 81–97.Google Scholar
  22. Long, E. R., Robertson, A., Wolfe, D. A., Hameedi, J. and Sloane, G. M.: 1996, ‘Estimates of the spatial extent of sediment toxicity in major U. S. estuaries’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 3585–3592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Long, E. R., Field, L. J. and MacDonald, D. D.: 1998, ‘Predicting toxicity in marine sediments with numerical sediment quality guidelines’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17(4), 714–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Long, E. R., Hameedi, J., Robertson, A., Dutch, M., Aasen, S., Ricci, C., Welch, K., Kammin, W., Carr, R. S., Johnson, T., Biedenbach, J., Scott, K. J., Mueller, C. and Anderson, J.: 1999, Sediment Quality in Puget Sound. Year 1 – Northern Puget Sound, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA No. 139 and Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 99-347, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, p. 221 + appendix.Google Scholar
  25. Long, E. R., Hameedi, J., Robertson, A., Dutch, M., Aasen, S., Welch, K., Magoon, S., Carr, R. S., Johnson, T., Biedenbach, J., Scott, K. J., Mueller, C. and Anderson, J.: 2000, Sediment Quality in Puget Sound. Year 2 – Central Puget Sound, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA No. 147 and Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 00-03-055, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, p. 72 + appendix.Google Scholar
  26. Long, E. R., Dutch, M., Aasen, S., Welch, K., Hameedi, J., Magoon, S., Carr, R. S., Johnson, T., Biedenbach, J., Scott, K. J., Mueller, C. and Anderson, J.: 2002a, Sediment Quality in Puget Sound. Year 3 – Southern Puget Sound, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA No. 153 and Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 02-03-033, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, p. 77 + appendix.Google Scholar
  27. Long, E. R., Hameedi, M. J., Sloane, G. M. and Read, L. B.: 2002b, ‘Chemical contamination, toxicity, and Benthic community indices in sediments of the Lower Miami River and adjoining portions of Biscayne Bay’, Estuaries 25(4A), 622–637.Google Scholar
  28. Macauley, J. M., Summers, J. K., Engle, V. D., Heitmuller, P. T., Brooks, G. T., Babikow, M. and Adams, A. M.: 1994, Statistical Summary: EMAP-Estuaries, Lousianian Province – 1992, Technical Report, EPA/620/R-94-002, US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Breeze, FL, p. 82 + appendix.Google Scholar
  29. Malins, D. C., McCain, B. B., Brown, D. W., Sparks, A. K., Hodgins, H. O. and Chan, S. -L.: 1982, Chemical Contaminants and Abnormalities in Fish and Invertebrates from Puget Sound, NOAA Technical Memo, NOS/OMPA 17, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, p. 168.Google Scholar
  30. Malins, D. C., McCain, B. B., Brown, D. W., Chan, S., Myers, M. S., Landahl, J. T., Gprohaska, P., Friedman, A. J., Rhodes, L. D., Burrows, D. G., Gronlund, W. D. and Hodgins, H. O.: 1984, ‘Chemical pollutants in sediments and diseases of bottom-dwelling fish in Puget Sound, Washington’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 705–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Research Council: 1989, Contaminated Marine Sediments – Assessment and Remediation, Marine Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Science Press, Washington, DC, p. 508.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, F. H.: 2003, ‘Interdecadal change in the deep Puget Sound benthos’, Hydrobiologia 493, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Partridge, V., Welch, K., Aasen, S. and Dutch, M.: in preparation, ‘Analysis of Sediment Quality at 10 Long-Term Stations in Puget Sound for the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP) Sediment Monitoring Component, 1989–2000’, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.Google Scholar
  34. Paul, J. F., Scott, K. J., Holland, A. F., Weisberg, S. B., Summers, J. K. and Robertson, A.: 1992, ‘The estuarine component of the US EPA's environmental monitoring and assessment program’, Chem. Ecol. 7, 93–116.Google Scholar
  35. Power, E. A. and Chapman, P. M.: 1992, ‘Assessing Sediment Quality’, in: G. A. Burton, Jr. (ed.), Sediment Toxicity Assessment, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  36. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1986, Recommended Protocols for Measuring Conventional Sediment Variables in Puget Sound, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Office of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by Tetra-Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA, p. 25.Google Scholar
  37. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1987, Recommended Protocols for Sampling and Analyzing Subtidal Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in Puget Sound, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Office of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA, p. 32.Google Scholar
  38. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1995, Recommended Guidelines for Conducting Laboratory Bioassays on Puget Sound Sediments, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by King County Environmental Lab, Seattle, WA, p. 30 + appendices.Google Scholar
  39. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1996a, Recommended Guidelines for Sampling Marine Sediment, Water Column, and Tissue in Puget Sound, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by King County Environmental Lab, Seattle, WA, p. 51.Google Scholar
  40. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1996b, Recommended Guidelines for Measuring Metals in Puget Sound Marine Water, Sediment and Tissue Samples, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by King County Environmental Lab, Seattle, WA, p. 43 + appendices.Google Scholar
  41. Puget Sound Estuary Program: 1996c, Recommended Guidelines for Measuring Organic Compounds in Puget Sound Water, Sediment and Tissue Samples, Technical Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Seattle, WA and Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Olympia, WA by King County Environmental Lab, Seattle, WA, p. 30 + appendices.Google Scholar
  42. Ranasinghe, A.: 2004, personal communication.Google Scholar
  43. Schiewe, M. H., Hawk, E. G., Actor, D. I. and Krahn, M. M.: 1985, ‘Use of a bacterial bioluminescence assay to assess toxicity of contaminated marine sediments’, Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 42, 1244–1248.Google Scholar
  44. Schimmel, S. C., Melzian, B. D., Campbell, D. E., Strobel, C. J., Benyi, S. J., Rosen, J. S. and Buffum H. W.: 1994, Statistical Summary. EMAP-Estuaries. Virginian Province – 1991, Technical Report, EPA 620/R-94/005, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p. 77.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, R. W., Bergen, M., Weisberg, S. B., Cadien, D., Dalkey, A., Montagne, D., Stull, J. K. and Velarde, R. G.: 2001, ‘Benthic response index for assessing infaunal communities on the Southern California mainland shelf’, Ecol. Appl. 11(4), 1073–1087.Google Scholar
  46. Strobel, C. J., Buffum, H. W., Benyi, S. J., Petrocelli, E. A., Reifsteck, D. R. and Keith, D. J.: 1995, Statistical Summary. EMAP-Estuaries. Virginian Province – 1990 to 1993, Technical Report, US EPA/620/R-94/-26, US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  47. Striplin Environmental Associates, Inc.: 1996, Development of Reference Value Ranges for Benthic Infauna Assessment Endpoints in Puget Sound, Final Report, prepared for the Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.Google Scholar
  48. Striplin Environmental Associates, Inc. and Roy F. Weston, Inc.: 1999, Puget Sound Reference Value Project. Task 3: Development of Benthic Effects Sediment Quality Standards, submitted to Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.Google Scholar
  49. Summers, J. K., Macauley, J. M., Heitmuller, P. T., Engle, V. D., Adams, A. M. and Brooks, G. T.: 1993, Statistical Summary: EMAP-Estuaries Louisianian Province – 1991, Technical Report, EPA/620/R-93-007, US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Breeze, FL.Google Scholar
  50. Swartz, R. C., DeBen, W. A., Sercu, K. A. and Lamberson, J. O.: 1982, ‘Sediment toxicity and the distribution of amphipods in Commencement Bay, Washington, USA’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 13, 359–364.Google Scholar
  51. Thursby, G. B., Heltshe, J. and Scott, K. J.: 1997, ‘Revised approach to toxicity test acceptability criteria using a statistical performance assessment’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16(6), 1322–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turgeon, D. D., Hameedi, J., Harmon, M. R., Long, E. R., McMahon, K. D. and White, H. H.: 1998, Sediment toxicity in U. S. coastal waters, Special Report, Technical Report, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  53. US EPA: 1997, The Incidence and Severity of Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States. Vol. 1. National Sediment Quality Survey, Technical Report, EPA 823-R-97-006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Van Dolah, R. F., Hyland, J. L., Holland, A. F., Rosen, J. S. and Snoots, T. R.: 1999, ‘A benthic index of biological integrity for assessing habitat quality in estuaries of the southeastern United States’, Mar. Environ. Res. 48, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Washington State Department of Ecology: 1995, Sediment Management Standards. Chapter 173-204 WAC, Technical Report, Publication No. 96-252, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, p. 66.Google Scholar
  56. Weisberg, S. B., Ranasinghe, J. A., Dauer, D. M., Schaffner, L. C., Diaz, R. J. and Frithsen, J. B.: 1997, ‘An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay’, Estuaries 29(1), 149–158.Google Scholar
  57. Wolfe, D. A., Robertson, A. and Long, E. R.: 1993, ‘The NS&T Bioeffects Surveys: Design Strategies and Preliminary Results’, in: O. T. Magoon, W. S. Wilson, H. Converse and L. T. Tobin (eds.), Coastal Zone ‘93. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management, Vol. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 298–312.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward R. Long
    • 1
  • Margaret Dutch
    • 1
  • Sandra Aasen
    • 1
  • Kathy Welch
    • 1
  • M. Jawed Hameedi
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Assessment ProgramWashington State Department of EcologyOlympiaU.S.A.
  2. 2.National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, NOS/NCCOS/CCMASilver SpringU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations