Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival Analysis for a Large-Scale Forest Health Issue: Missouri Oak Decline

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survival analysis methodologies provide novel approaches for forest mortality analysis that may aid in detecting, monitoring, and mitigating of large-scale forest health issues. This study examined survivor analysis for evaluating a regional forest health issue – Missouri oak decline. With a statewide Missouri forest inventory, log-rank tests of the effects of covariates on the survivor function and equality of the survivor function among classes were conducted for selected oak species.

Additionally, hazard functions were determined for diameter classes for damaged and undamaged oaks. Results indicate that mortality appears to vary significantly among some inventory classes such as oak species, but not among other classes such as ownership class. Indicators of individual tree vigor (i.e., crown class and ratio) were more significant predictors of oak tree mortality than site/stand attributes (i.e., density and aspect). Finally, results indicate that even fast-growing oak trees are at high risk of mortality if damaged by disease. Survival analyses, such as those applied in this study, may enable testing of forest health hypotheses using large-scale inventories. In the context of Missouri’s oak forest decline, study results suggest management efforts should focus on limiting the spread of disease damage, increasing the vigor of residual trees, and emphasizing small trees when developing stand prescriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D.: 1995, Survival Analysis Using the SAS System, a Practical Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. 300 pp.

  • Amateis, R. L., Burkhart, H. E. and Walsh, T. A.: 1997, ‘Modeling survival in juvenile and mature loblolly pine plantations’, For. Ecol. Manage. 13, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman, M. A., Incoll, W., Ades, P. K., Ferguson, I., Fletcher, T. D. and Wohlers, A.: 1994, ‘Mortality models for mountain and alpine ash’, For. Ecol. Manage. 67, 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, D.: 1994, Modeling Survival Data in Medical Research, Chapman and Hall, CRC, New York, New York, 347 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. P., Cutter, B. E. and Wetteroff, J. J.: 1995, ‘A dendrological study of black and scarlet oak decline in the Missouri Ozarks’, For. Ecol. Manage. 75, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • FHM: 2002, Forest Health Highlights –Missouri, Forest health Monitoring Program, USDA, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota.

  • Flewelling, J. and Monserud, R. A.: 2002, ‘Comparing Methods for Modeling Tree Mortality’, in N. L. Crookston and R. N., Havis (eds.), the 2nd Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference, February 12–14, 2002, Ft. Collins, Colorado. RMRS-P-25, pp. 169–177.

  • Kessler, K. J. Jr.: 1989, ‘Some perspectives on oak decline in the ‘80’s’, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota. NC-GTR 132: 25–29.

  • Kessler, K. J. Jr.: 1992, ‘Oak Decline on Public Lands in the Central Forest Region’, USDA Forest Service, North Central Station, Res. Note. St. Paul, Minnesota. NC-362.

  • Lawrence, R., Moltzan, B. and Moser, W. K.: 2002, ‘Oak decline and the future of Missouri’s forests’, Missouri Cons. 63, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherberry, E. C. and Treiman, T. B.: 2002, ‘Missouri’s forest resources in 2000’, Res. Bull. NC-209. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station St. Paul, Minnesota. 23 p.

  • Manion, P. D.: 1991, Tree Disease Concepts, 2nd ed., Prentiss-Hall, Edgewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 328–348.

  • Manion, P. D. and Griffin, D. H.: 2001, ‘Large landscape scale analysis of tree death in the Adirondack Park, New York’, For. Sci. 47, 542–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, P. D., Brand, G. J., Alerich, C. L., Bednar, L. F., Woudenberg, S. W., Glover, J. F., and Ezzell, E. N.: 2001, ‘The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Applications and Users Manual Version 1.0’, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-218, St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, 130 pp.

  • Morse, B. W. and Kulman, H. M.: 1984, ‘Plantation white spruce mortality: Estimates based on aerial photography and analysis using a life-table format’, Can. J. For. Res. 14, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, W. K., and Melick, R.: 2002, ‘Management recommendations for oak decline’, Unpublished Missouri Dept. of Cons. Memo to field personnel, p. 3.

  • Moser, W. K., Treiman, T., Moltzan, B., Lawrence, R. and Brand, G.J.: 2004, ‘Missouri’s forest resources in 2002’, Res. Bull. NC-233. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota. 42 pp.

  • Muenchow, G.: 1986. Ecological use of failure time analysis. Ecology 67, 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker, T.E., Ammon, V.D., Boyle, C.R., McCracken, F.I., and Solomon, J.D.: 1992, ‘Oak decline: A comparison of study results from different areas of the south’, Miss. Agr. Exp. St. 19 pp.

  • Oak, S., Tainter, F., Williams, J. and Starkey, D.: 1996, ‘Oak decline risk rating for the southeastern United States’, Ann. Sci. For. 53, 721–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. D. and Larsen, B. C.: 1996, Forest Stand Dynamics, Wiley, New York, New York, 520 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, B. S.: 1998, ‘The role of stress in the mortality of mid western oaks as indicated by growth prior to death’, Ecology 79, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisler, H. K. and Slaughter, G. W.: 1997, ‘Stochastic model for tree survival in stands affected by annosum root disease’, For. Sci. 43, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reams, G. A., Brann, T. B. and Halteman, W. A.: 1988, ‘A nonparametric survival model for balsam fir during a spruce budworm outbreak’, Can. J. For. Res. 18, 787–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. E., Jr.: 2002, Modeling and Allocating Forestry Survival: A Loblolly Pine Case Study, Dissertation, University of Georgia.Athens, Georgia, 176 pp.

  • SAS Software. Version 8 (1999) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

  • Shifley, S. R., Roovers, L. M., Jensen, R. G. and Larsen, D. R.. : 2000, ‘Composition and Structure of Woody Forest Vegetation in the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project’, in. S. R. Shifley and B. L. Brookshire, (eds.), Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: Site History, Soils, Landforms Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation, Downwood and Inventory Methods for the Landscape Experiment. GTR. NC –208, pp. 71–106, St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station. St. Paul, Minnesota, 314 pp.

  • Spencer, J. S. Jr., Roussopoulos, S. M. and Massengale, R. A.: 1992, ‘Missouri’s forest resource, 1989: an analysis’, Res. Bull. NC-139, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, 84 pp.

  • Starkey, D. A. and Oak, S. W.: 1989, ‘Site factors and stand conditions associated with oak decline in southern upland hardwood forests’, NC-GTR 132, USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp. 95–102.

  • Starkey, D. A., Oak, S. W., Ryan, G. W., Tainter, F. H., Redmond, C. and Brown, H. D.: 1989, ‘Evaluation of Oak Decline Areas in the South’, Prot. Rep. R8-PR-17, USDA Forest Service, Region 8, Atlanta, Georgia. 36 pp.

  • Thomas, W. D. and Boza, C. A.: 1984, ‘The oak decline complex’, J. Arbor. 10, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volney, W. J. A.: 1998, ‘Ten-year tree mortality following a jack pine budworm outbreak in Saskatchewan’, Can. J. For. Res. 28, 1784–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, W. E.: 1969, ‘Life-table approach to analysis of insect impact’, J. For. 67, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, P. H. and Clark, J. S.: 2000, ‘Predicting tree mortality from diameter growth: A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches’, Can. J. For. Res. 30, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Woodall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodall, C.W., Grambsch, P.L., Thomas, W. et al. Survival Analysis for a Large-Scale Forest Health Issue: Missouri Oak Decline. Environ Monit Assess 108, 295–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-4330-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-4330-5

Keywords

Navigation