Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Satellite Imagery as Environmental Impact Assessment Tool: A case Study from the Nw Egyptian Red Sea Coastal Zone

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge and detecting impacts of human activities on the coastal ecosystem is an essential management requirement and also very important for future and proper planning of coastal areas. Moreover, documentation of these impacts can help in increasing public awareness about side effects of unsustainable practices. Analysis of multidate remote sensing data can be used as an effective tool in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Being synoptic and frequent in coverage, multidate data from Landsat and other satellites provide a reference record and bird’s eye viewing to the environmental situation of the coastal ecosystem and the associated habitats. Furthermore, integration of satellite data with field observations and background information can help in decision if a certain activity has caused deterioration to a specific habitat or not. The present paper is an attempt to utilize remote sensing data for assessment impacts of some human activities on the major sensitive habitats of the NW Egyptian Red Sea coastal zone, definitely between Ras Gemsha and Safaga. Through multidate change analysis of Landsat data (TM & ETM+ sensors), it was possible to depict some of the human infringements in the area and to provide, in some cases, exclusive evidences for the damaging effect of some developmental activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apan, A. A.: 1997, ‘Land cover mapping for tropical forest rehabilitation planning using remotely-sensed data’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 18(5), 1029–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P. S.: 1988, ‘An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data’, Remote Sensing Environ. 24, 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewidar, Kh. M.: 2002, ‘Landfill detection in Hurghada, North Red Sea, Egypt, using thematic mapper images’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 23(5), 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, B.: 1986, ‘Oil and the Black Mangrove (Avicennia marina) in the northern Red Sea’, Marine Pollut. Bull. 17(11), 500–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth Resource Mapping Pty Ltd.: 1996, ER Mapper 5.5 Reference, 430 pp.

  • Eckhardt, D. W., Verdin, J. P. and Lyford, G. R.: 1990, ‘Automated update of an irrigation lands GIS using SPOT HRV imagery’, Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 56, 1515–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gamily, H. I., Nasr, S. and El-Raey, M.: 2001, ‘An assessment of natural and human-induced changes along Hurghada and Ras Abou Soma coastal area, Red Sea, Egypt’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 22(15), 2999–3014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frihy, O. E., Fanos, A. M., Khafagy, A. A. and Abu Aesha, K. A.: 1996, ‘Human impacts on the coastal zone of Hurghada, northern Red Sea, Egypt’, Geo-Marine Lett. 16, 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frihy, O. E.: 2001, ‘The necessity of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in implementing coastal projects: Lessons learned from the Egyptian Mediterranean coast’, Ocean Coastal Manage. 44, 489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. M., Smith, G. M. and Devereux, B. J.: 2003, ‘The characterization and measurement of land cover change through remote sensing: Problems in operational applications?’, Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 4, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GADFR (General Authority for Development of Fish Resources of Egypt): 1994, Annual Report on Fisheries Statistics of Egypt, Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo.

  • GADFR (General Authority for Development of Fish Resources of Egypt): 2000, Annual Report on Fisheries Statistics of Egypt, Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo.

  • GEF: 1997, ‘Baseline Report (Report #2)’, Egyptian Red Sea Coastal & Marine Resources Management Project, 109 pp. +Annexes.

  • GEF: 1998a, ‘Reef Recreation Management Action Plan for the Egyptian Red Sea (Report #4)’, Egyptian Red Sea Coastal & Marine Resources Management Project, 96 pp. + Annexes.

  • GEF: 1998b, ‘Coastal Management Protected Area Strategy for the Egyptian Red Sea (Report #5 in two parts, I and II)’, Egyptian Red Sea Coastal & Marine Resources Management Project, 175 pp. +Annexes.

  • Gubbay, S. and Rosenthal, D.: 1982, Reefwatch Egypt 1982. General report for the Expedition, Cambridge University Underwater Exploration Group, UK.

  • Hawkins, J. P. and Roberts, C. M.: 1994a, ‘Can Egypt’s Coral Reefs Support Ambitious Plans for Diving Tourism?’, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Coral Reef Symposium, 1992, 22–27 June. Gaum, pp. 1007–1013.

  • Hawkins, J. P. and Roberts, C. M.: 1994b, ‘The growth of coastal tourism in the Red Sea: Present and possible future effects on coral reefs’, Ambio 23, 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. 1999, ‘A global assessment of human effects on coral reefs’, Marine Pollut. Bull. 38(5), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP: 1988, Coral Reefs of the World, Vol. 2: Indian Ocean, Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, IUCN, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 389 pp.

  • Jameson, S. and Smith, D.: 1997, ‘Coral reef management on the new Red Sea Riviera’, Proc. Coastal Zone 2, 784–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, S. C., Ammar, M. S., Saadalla, E., Mostafa, H. M. and Riegl, B.: 1999, ‘A coral damage index and its application to diving sites in the Egyptian Red Sea’, Coral Reef 18(4), 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R.: 1996, Introductory Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 316 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W.: 2000, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 724 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas, J.-F.: 1999, ‘Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 20(1), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masek, J. G., Lindsay, F. E. and Coward, S. N.: 2000, ‘Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area (1973–1996) from Landsat observations’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 21(18), 3473–3486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medio, D. M., Pearson, P. and Ormond, R. F.: 1997, ‘Effect of briefings on rates of damage to corals by divers’, Biol. Conserv. 79, 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. R., Hardy, J. T., Mazel, C. H. and Dustan, P.: 1999, ‘Optical spectra and pigmentation of Caribbean reef corals and macroalgae’, Coral Reefs 18, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis, J. S., Roberts, C. M., Smith, A. H. and Siirila, E.: 1997, ‘Human-enhanced impacts of a tropical storm on nearshore coral reefs’, Ambio 26, 515–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher, N. J. and Al-Suhaibany, A.: 2000, ‘Regional Status of Coral Reefs in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden’, in: C. R. Wilkinson (ed.), Status of Coral Reefs of the World, Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia, 363 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. A.: 1999, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction, 4th ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 363 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegl, B. and Luke, K. E.: 1998, ‘Ecological characteristics of dynamited reefs in the northern Red Sea and their relevance to reef rehabilitation’, Marine Pollut. Bull. 37(8–12), 488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegl, B. and Piller, W. E.: 2000, ‘Mapping of benthic habitats in the northern Safaga bay (Red Sea, Egypt): A tool for proactive management. Aquatic conservation’, Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 10, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegl, B. and Velimirov, B.: 1991, ‘How many damaged corals in Red Sea reef systems? A quantitative survey’, Hydrobiologia 216/217, 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.: 1989, ‘Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 10(6), 989–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souter, D. W. and Linden, O.: 2000, ‘The health and future of coral reef systems’, Ocean Coastal Manage. 43, 657–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunar, F.: 1998, ‘An analysis of changes in a multidate data set: A case study in the Ikitelli area, Istanbul, Turkey’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 19(2), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tole, L.: 2002, ‘An estimate of forest cover extent and change in Jamaica using Landsat MSS data’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 23(1), 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. R. (ed.): 1998 , Status of Coral Reefs of the World 1998, Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia, 184 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., Daly, S., Davies, C. and Hendrick, V.: 1996, {Marine Conservation Society Hurghada Reef Monitoring Programme 1996, Report and Recommendations}, Report for MCS, London, 71 pp.

  • Yuan, D., Elvidge, C. D. and Lunetta, R.: 1998, ‘Survey of Multispectral Methods for Land Cover Change Analysis’, in: R.S. Lunetta and C. D. Elvidge (eds.), Remote Sensing Change Detection, Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, 318 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Oceanography & Fisheries, Kayet-Bey, Al-Anfoushi, Alex, Egypt

    Wahid M. Moufaddal

Authors
  1. Wahid M. Moufaddal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wahid M. Moufaddal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moufaddal, W.M. Use of Satellite Imagery as Environmental Impact Assessment Tool: A case Study from the Nw Egyptian Red Sea Coastal Zone. Environ Monit Assess 107, 427–452 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3576-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3576-2

Keyword

Search

Navigation