Skip to main content
Log in

The Quality of Water Resources in Dalmatia

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to monitor and record the specific characteristics and properties of most of the important water resources in Dalmatia located in Southern Croatia for a period of 5 years (1998–2002) according to established standards for drinking water. The paper presents a detailed account of their chemical content, the classification and the concentration of salts. The bacteriological pollution levels are indicated by the total coliform bacterial levels (MPN coli/100 mL). The water characteristics are expressed by coefficients, which represent the ratios between water ingredients. The Ca/Mg eq ratio, SO4/Cl eq ratio and K1, K2 for bicarbonate hardness were calculated. The hygienic characteristics of the water samples were expressed by the total coliform bacteria estimation (MPN coli/100 mL), the permanganate consumption (KMnO4) and biological oxygen demand (BOD5). Karst waters in Dalmatia are moderately hard, the SO4/Cl ratio is 0.38–1.6, non-corrosive (K1 lower than 0.2) and not significantly mineralised (< 500 mg/L minerals). Sulphate waters are generally hard, the SO4/Cl ratio is higher than 1.6, K1 is 0.2–0.65. Marine waters are quite hard or hard, particularly at the river estuaries, the SO4/Cl ratio is lower than 0.38, and K1 is higher than 0.65. The groundwater and springs in Dalmatia are less polluted than surface waters. A majority of these have a geometric average value of MPN coli < 150/100 mL of water observed in 24 of 42 locations studied. The highest bacteriological pollution was found in nine locations where MPN coli > 1000/100 mL and moderate pollution was found in nine locations where MPN coli is between 150 and 1000/100 mL of water. The physical and chemical parameters determined for the most sources in Dalmatia are safe below the international permissible limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aljtovski, M.E.: 1973, Hydrogeological Manual, Construction Book, Beograd.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA: 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, R.W., Nagle, N. and Terry, K.: 1988, ‘Characterization of saline groundwater resource quality for aquatic biomass production: A statistical-based approach,’, Water Res. 22(3), 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci, O.: 1991, ‘Hydrology and water resources of small karst islands along the Adriatic coast,’, in: KrŠ Jugoslavije 13, Academia scientiarum et artium slavorum meridionalium, Zagreb.

  • Buljan, M.: 1962, ‘New geochemical method of distinguishing the varieties of natural water,’, Croatica Chemica Acta 34, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC: 1994, Desertification and Kind Degradation in the European Mediterranean, Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General XII, Report EUR 14850, Brussel.

  • Coccosis, H., Burt, T. and Van der Weide, J.: 1999, Conceptual Framework and Planning Guidelines for Integrated Coastal Area and River Basin Management, United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Priority Actions Programme, Regional Activity Centre Split, Croatia, 85 p.

  • Cox, W.E.: 1989, Water and Development: Managing the Relationship, UNESCO, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkonmark, M. and Lindh, G.: 1993, Water and Economic Development Published in Water in Crisis, Peter Gleick (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran, J.A. and Adler, R.: ‘Cleaner water, but not clean enough: Proposals to strengthen the Clean Water Act,’, Issues in Science and Technology, Winter (1993–94), 33.

  • Hesphanol, I. and Prost, A.M.E.: 1994, ‘WHO guidelines and national standards for reuse and water quality,’, Water Res. 28(1), 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, K.: 1998, ‘Developing Resources: A Growing Challenge,’, in: Developing World Water, Water Resources, Grosvenor Press International, University of Zimbabwe.

  • Joris, A.L. and Van Dem Bergen, J.W.V.: 1998, ‘Entwicklungen in der europäischen Regelung des Gewässerschutzes,’, in: 15. Arbeitstagung der IAWR (Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft des Wasserwerke im Rheineinzugsgebiet), Duisburg, Sekretariat der IAWR, Amsterdam.

  • Jürgen, B.H. and Jülich, W.: 1995, ‘Die Beschafenheit des Rheins im Zeitraum 1994–1995,’, in: IAWR- Rheinbericht, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, T.S. and R.W. Scold 1958, ‘Laboratory studies relating mineral quality of water to corrosion of steel and cast iron,’, Corrosion 16, 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matoković, B. and Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 1994, ‘The ecological database VODE (waters) as the base for monitoring and the study of the water quality parameters correlation,’, J. Med. Syst. 18(6), 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, J.S.: 1998, ‘The quality of river waters in Finland,’, Eur. Water Manag. 1, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 1991, The State of the Environment, Annual Report, Paris.

  • Official Bulletin of Croatia.: 1994, Government Printing Office. Croatian standard for drinking water. No 46. Zagreb.

  • Official Bulletin of Croatia.: 1998, Government Printing Office. Croatian water classification Act. No 77, Zagreb.

  • Ramanathan, A.I., Vaithiyanathan, P., Subramanian, P. and Dask, B.: 1994, ‘Nature and transport of solute load in the convery river basin, India,’, Water Res. 28(77), 1585–1593.

    Google Scholar 

  • RaŠić, T.: 1975, Desinfection of Drinking Water, Society of water technology. Beograd.

  • Sequi, P. and Vianello, G.: 1993, Fasi Preliminari di Lettera del Territorio Finalizzato allo Studio di Vulnerabilita Ambientale in L’ impatto delle Agro technologie nel Bacino del Po (acuradi N. Polelli), Ed. Franco Angeli Roma, 273–277 pp.

  • Sequi, P., Vianello, G. and Ciavata, C.: 1991, An Italian approach to the Determination of Areas Vulnerable to Pollution, in N.H. Batjes and I.M. Bridges (eds), Soil Vulnerability to Pollution in Europe, ISRIC, Wageningen, g1–g7 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SliŠković, I.: 1994, ‘On the hydrogeological condition of western Herzegovina, (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and possibilities for new groundwater extractions,’, Geologia Croatica, 42(2), 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 1994, Waters of Dalmatia,Institute of Public Health Split, Split, 254 p.

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 1998, Waters of Neretva River and its Catchment Area, Institute of Public Health Split, 683 p.

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 1999a, ‘Water quality evaluation by index in Dalmatia,’, Water Res. 33(16), 3423–3440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 2001, Sodium Levels in Drinking Water as an Index to Human Health, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Vol. 7, No. 6, 1757–1764 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 2002, Waters of Cetina River and its Catchment Area, Institute of Public Health Split, Split, 814 p.

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N.: 2003, ‘Comparison of Dalmatian waters evaluation indices,’, Water Environ. Res. 75(5), 388–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štambuk-Giljanović, N. and Matoković, B.: 1999, ‘Information subsystem of the chemical coefficients K1 and K2 as the base for the study of the ecological factors that influence human health,’, J. Med. Syst. 23(2), 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanners, D. and Bourdeau, P. (eds): 1995, ‘Europe’s Environment,’, The Dobbris Assessment Compiled Eurostat together with other organizations, 455 p.

  • Stoddard, J.L.: 1991, ‘Trends in Catskill stream, water quality—Evidence from historical data,’, Water Resour. Res. 27, 2855–2864.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA: 1993a, The Watershed Protection Approach: Annual Report 1992, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Report #EPA 840-S-93-001, Washington, DC, 58 p.

  • USEPA: 1995, Compendium of Tools for Watershed Assessment and TMDL Development, Draft, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.

  • USEPA: 1997a, Monitoring Guidance for Determining the Effectiveness of Nonpoint Source Controls, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Report #EPA841-B-96-004, Washington, DC.

  • USEPA: 1997b, Monitoring Guidance for Determining the Effectiveness of Nonpoint Source Controls, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Report EPA S-11-B-96-004, Washington, DC.

  • USEPA: 1998a, Providing Safe Drinking Water in America, 1996 National Public Water Systems Compliance Report and Update on Implementation of the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments, USEPA Office of Water, Washington, D.C. Report #EPA 305-R-98001.

  • USEPA: 1998b, The Clean Water Action Plan, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 89 pp.

  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): 1995, Final Report of the Inter-governmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality, USGS Open File Report 95-742. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Wet Weather Federal Advisory Committee (UWWFAC): 1996, Draft Recommendations of Monitoring Requirements for Watershed Management Programs,Washington, DC.

  • Villalba, M. 1995, ‘Hydrochemical study of an aquifer system in an agricultural area in south west Spain,’, Water Res. 29(5), 1361–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation Guideline: 1993, Drinking Water Quality, Vol. 1, Recommendation, Geneva, 57 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nives štambuk-Giljanović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

štambuk-Giljanović, N. The Quality of Water Resources in Dalmatia. Environ Monit Assess 104, 235–268 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1614-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1614-8

Keywords

Navigation