Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restoring the Great Basin Desert, U.S.A.: Integrating Science, Management, and People

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The Great Basin Desert lies between the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the west and the Rocky Mountains to the east. Nearly 60% of the area’s deserts and mountains (roughly 30 million ha) are managed by the U. S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management. This area is characterized by low annual precipitation, diverse desert plant communities, and local economies that depend on the products (livestock grazing, recreation, mining, etc.) produced by these lands. The ecological and economic stability of the Great Basin is increasingly at risk due to the expansion of fire-prone invasive species and increase in wildfires. To stem this loss of productivity and diversity in the Great Basin, the BLM initiated the “Great Basin Restoration Initiative” in 1999 after nearly 0.7 million ha of the Great Basin burned in wildfires. The objective of the Great Basin Restoration Initiative is to restore plant community diversity and structure by improving resiliency to disturbance and resistance to invasive species over the long-term. To accomplish this objective, a strategic plan has been developed that emphasizes local participation and reliance on appropriate science to ensure that restoration is accomplished in an economical and ecologically appropriate manner. If restoration in the Great Basin is not successful, desertification and the associated loss of economic stability and ecological integrity will continue to threaten the sustainability of natural resources and people in the Great Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, E.B. and Jackson, L.L.: 1992, ‘The arid west’, Restor. Manage. Notes 10, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Land Management: 1999, Out of Ashes, and Opportunity, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, ID. 28 pp.

  • Bureau of Land Management: 2000, The Great Basin: Healing the Land, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, ID. 36 pp.

  • Bureau of Land Management: 2001, A Hand to Nature: Progress to Date, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, ID. 33 pp.

  • Cottam, J.S.: 1908, The Improvements of Mountain Meadows, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bur. Plant Industry Bulletin No. 127, Washington DC.

  • Coville, F.V.: 1898, Forest Growth and Sheep Grazing in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Forest. Bull. No. 15, Washington DC.

  • Devine, R.: 1993, ‘The cheatgrass problem’, Atlantic 271(5), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dregne, H.E.: 1977, ‘Desertification of arid lands’, Econ. Geogr. 3, 329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremont, J.C.: 1845, Report of the Exploring Expedition to the Rocky Mountains in the Year 1842, and to Oregon and California the Years 1843–1844, Goles and Seaton, Washington DC.

  • Gleason, H.A. and Cronquist, A.: 1964, The Natural Geography of Plants, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D.: 1902, Forage Conditions on the Northern Border of the Great Basin, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bur. Plant Industry Bulletin No. 15, Washington DC.

  • Hull, A.C. Jr. and Stewart, G.: 1948, ‘Replacing cheatgrass by reseeding with perennial grass on southern Idaho ranges’, Am. Soc. Agron. J. 40, 694–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, A.C. Jr. and Holmgren, R.C.: 1964, ‘Seeding southern Idaho rangelands’, Res. Pap. INT- 10.

  • Hull, A.C. Jr.: 1965, ‘Cheatgrass—A Persistent Homesteader’, in: Proceedings, Cheatgrass Symposium, 27–30 July, 1965, Vale, OR. [Portland, OR]: U.S. Department of the Interior, Oregon Bureau of Land Management, pp. 20–26.

  • Hull, A.C.: 1974, ‘Species for seeding arid rangeland in southern Idaho’, J. Range Manage. 27, 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knick, S.T.: 1999, ‘Requiem for a sagebrush ecosystem?’ Northwest Sci. 73, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsen, S.B. and McArthur, E.D.: 1995, ‘Implications of Early Intermountain Range and Watershed Restoration’, in: B.A. Roundy, E.D. McArthur, J.B. Haley and D.K. Mann (Comps.): 1995, Proceedings Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium; 1993 October 19–21; Las Vegas, NV.Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-315. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

  • Monsen, S.B. and Shaw, N.L.: 2001, ‘Development and Use of Plant Resources for Western Wildlands’, in: E. D. McArthur and D. J. Fairbanks (Comps.): 2001, Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity: Proceedings, 13–15 June 2000 Provo, UT. Proc. RMRS-P-21, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

  • Muhn, J. and Stuart, R.S.: 1988, Opportunity and Challenge, the Story of BLM, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechanec, J.F. and Hull, A.C. Jr.: 1945, ‘Spring forage lost through cheatgrass fires’, Natl. Wool Grower 35, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellant, M.: 1990, ‘The Cheatgrass-Wildfire Cycle–Are There Any Solutions?’, in: E.D. McArthur, E.M. Romney, S.D. Smith and P.T. Tueller (Comps.): Proceedings—Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-Off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management, 5–7 April 1989, Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, pp. 11–17.

  • Pellant, M. and Hall, C.: 1994, ‘Distribution of Two Exotic Grasses on Public Lands in the Great Basin: Status in 1992’, in: S.B. Monsen and S.G. Kitchen (Comps.): 1994, Proceedings—Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands, 18–22 May 1992; Boise ID, Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, pp. 109–112.

  • Pellant, M.: 1994, ‘History and Applications of the Intermountain Greenstripping Program’, in: S.B. Monsen and S.G. Kitchen (Comps.): 1994, Proceedings—Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands, 18–22 May 1992, Boise ID, Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, pp. 63–68.

  • Piper, G.L.: 1983, ‘Rush skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington’, Weeds Today 14, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, K. and Jackman, E. R.: 1946, The Cheatgrass Problem in Oregon, Bulletin No. 668, Corvallis, OR: Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. 48 p.

  • Rowley, W.D.: 1985, U.S. Forest Service Grazing and Rangelands, Texas A & M Univ. Press. College Station, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A.W.: 1919, ‘Suggestions for instructions in range management’, J. Forest. 17, 523–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A.W.: 1926, ‘Grazing Periods and Forage Production on the National Forests’, Bulletin No. 1405, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

  • Stark, R.H., Toevs, J.L. and Hafenrichter, A.L.: 1946, ‘Grasses and cultural methods for reseeding abandoned farmlands in southern Idaho’, Idaho Agric. Exp. Stat. Bull. 267, 36 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B.A., Kutner, L.S. and Adams, J.S.: 2000 Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States Oxford University Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. and A.C. Hull, Jr.: 1949, ‘Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.)—an ecologic intruder in southern Idaho’, Ecology 30(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1994, Earth Summit: Convention on Desertification, New York, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 1–14 June 1992.

  • West, N.E: 1979, ‘Basic Synecological Relationships of Sagebrush-Dominated Lands in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau’, in: The Sagebrush Ecosystem: A Symposium, 27–28 April 1978; Logan, UT: Utah State University; College of Natural Resources, pp. 33–41.

  • Whisenant, S.G.: 1990, ‘Changing Fire Frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: Ecological and Management Implications’, in: E. McArthur, R. Durant, M.S. Evan, D.T. Stanley and T. Paul (Comps.) Proceedings—Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-Off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management, 5–7 April 1989, Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, pp. 1–7.

  • Wright, H.A., Nuenschwander, L.F. and Britton, C.M.: 1979, ‘The role and use of fire in sagebrush and pinyon juniper plant communities. A state of the art review’, Gen. Tech. Rep INT. 58, Ogden UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yensen, D.A.: 1980, A Grazing History of Southwestern Idaho with Emphasis on the Birds of Prey Study Area, Prog. Rep. Contract 52500-CT5-1002. Boise, ID: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management: 82 pp.

  • Young, J.A., Evans, R.A., Eckert, R. Jr. and Kay, B.L.: 1987, ‘Cheatgrass’, Rangelands, 9(6), 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.A.: 2000, ‘Range research in the far western United States: The first generation’, J. Range Manage. 53, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.A. and Clements, C.D.: 2001, ‘Range research: The second generation’, J. Range Manage. 54, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Pellant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellant, M., Abbey, B. & Karl, S. Restoring the Great Basin Desert, U.S.A.: Integrating Science, Management, and People. Environ Monit Assess 99, 169–179 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-004-4017-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-004-4017-3

Navigation