A crowdfunding platform is a typical two-sided market, as it acts as an intermediary that matches supply and demand sides of the platform, i.e., fundraisers and investors. Making the right pricing decision relies on a good understanding of dynamic behaviors of market players, which has not been fully understood in the research literature. This research studies investment decisions of crowdfunding investors and pricing choices of crowdfunding fundraisers, in both symmetric and asymmetric crowdfunding markets. For the symmetric crowdfunding market, a Hotelling model is used to analyze investors’ investment strategies and the minimum investment amount of financiers’ pricing strategies. For the asymmetric crowdfunding market, a Stackelberg model is used to analyze the decision-making behavior of the dominant and nondominant players competing for the same subset of potential investors on the platform. This research contributes to the existing research literature by considering, for the first time, the two unique variables, funding progress and the lucky draw probability of crowdfunding products, as well as their interaction. Our research finding suggests that investors should invest in crowdfunding products with relatively high minimum investment, even if it may lead to the failure of a crowdfunding project. Another interesting finding is that for crowdfunding fundraisers, asymmetric markets can be more profitable than symmetric markets. Our research results may contribute to crowdfunding product pricing theory and can be applied to real-world crowdfunding campaigns.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N., & Peitz, M. (2015). The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, 11–28.
Rong, Y., Huang, W.W., Lai, X., Jiang, C.C., Peng, Y. & Liu, L. (2018). Proposing a New Research Framework For Loan Allocation Strategies in P2P Lending. In Proceedings of The 18th International Conference on Electronic Business. ICEB, Guilin, CHN, December 2–6.
Lacan, C., & Desmet, P. (2017). Does the crowdfunding platform matter? Risks of negative attitudes in two-sided markets. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(6), 472–479.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2016). Financing by and for the Masses: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2):5–19.
Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, 1578175(1), 23.
Viotto da Cruz, J. (2015). Competition and regulation of crowdfunding platforms: A two-sided market approach. Communications & Strategies, 99, 33–50.
Tomczak, A., & Brem, A. (2013). A conceptualized investment model of crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 15(4), 335–359.
Mollick, E. R. (2013). Swept away by the crowd? Crowdfunding, venture capital, and the selection of entrepreneurs. Venture Capital, and the Selection of Entrepreneurs (March 25, 2013).
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313–333.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
Yeh, T. L., Chen, T. Y., & Lee, C. C. (2019). Investigating the funding success factors affecting reward-based crowdfunding projects. Innovation, 21(3), 466–486.
Chen, M., Liu, Z., Ma, C., & Gong, X. (2019). A distinctive early bird price in reward-based crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–24.
Luo, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2017, July). Pricing Strategy Study on Product Crowdfunding. In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 814–824). Springer, Cham.
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. Oxford University Press.
Dingman, S. (2013). Canadian’s smartwatch startup matches record $15-million in VC funding. The Globe and Mail, 16(5), 2013.
Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and society, 38(2), 326–359.
Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs all-or-nothing. Financial Management, 49(2), 331–360.
Zhou, S., Ma, T., & Liu, Z. (2021). Crowdfunding as a screener for collective investment. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), 195–221.
Du, S., Peng, J., Nie, T., & Yu, Y. (2020). Pricing strategies and mechanism choice in reward-based crowdfunding. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(3), 951–966.
Guo, X., Bi, G., & Lv, J. (2021). Crowdfunding mechanism comparison if there are altruistic donors. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1198–1211.
Chan, C. R., Parhankangas, A., Sahaym, A., & Oo, P. (2020). Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(2), 105934.
Zhao, Q., Chen, C. D., Wang, J. L., & Chen, P. C. (2017). Determinants of backers’ funding intention in crowdfunding: Social exchange theory and regulatory focus. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 370–384.
Kunz, M. M., Englisch, O., Beck, J., & Bretschneider, U. (2016). Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn–success factors in reward-based crowdfunding. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), Ilmenau, 2016: 467–478.
Hu, M., Li, X., & Shi, M. (2015). Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Science, 34(3), 331–345.
Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), 325.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Erjiang, E., Yu, M., & Peng, G. (2021). Intermediation in reward-based crowdfunding: a cash deposit mechanism to reduce moral hazard. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–22.
Zheng, H., Qi, Z., Luo, X., Li, L., & Xu, B. (2018). The value of backers’ word-of-mouth in crowdfunding projects filtering: an empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–26.
Li, Y., & Zuo, W. (2016). The crowdfunding project results prediction model. Statistics and Decision, 2, 86–89.
Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(4), 955–980.
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470.
Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T., & Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16(3), 247–269.
Sherali, H. D. (1984). A multiple leader Stackelberg model and analysis. Operations Research, 32(2), 390–404.
Parker, S. C. (2014). Crowdfunding, cascades and informed investors. Economics Letters, 125(3), 432–435.
Zhao, J., Li, Y., Ding, Y., & Liu, C. (2019). The value of leading customers in a crowdfunding-based marketing pattern. PloS one, 14(4), e0215323.
Xu, L., Wu, Q., Du, P., Qiao, X., Tsai, S. B., & Li, D. (2018). Financing target and resale pricing in reward-based crowdfunding. Sustainability, 10(4), 1297.
Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Yan, X., & Jin, J. (2020). The life-cycle influence mechanism of the determinants of financing performance: An empirical study of a Chinese crowdfunding platform. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 287–309.
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
Chellappa, R. K., & Mehra, A. (2018). Cost drivers of versioning: Pricing and product line strategies for information goods. Management Science, 64(5), 2164–2180.
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Defining two-sided markets. mimeo, IDEI, Toulouse, France, January.
Kaiser, U., & Wright, J. (2006). Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 1–28.
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174.
Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2018). Crowdfunding as a new financing tool. In The economics of crowdfunding (pp. 11–28). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Bouncken, R. B., Komorek, M., & Kraus, S. (2015). Crowdfunding: The current state of research. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 14(3), 407–416.
Damiano, E., & Hao, L. (2008). Competing matchmaking. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 789–818.
Hagiu, A. (2009). Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(4), 1011–1043.
Chakraborty, S., & Swinney, R. (2021). Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(1), 155–169.
Harter, J. F. (1997). Hotelling’s competition with demand location uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(3), 327–334.
Bender, M., Gal-Or, E., & Geylani, T. (2019). Crowdfunding as a vehicle for raising capital and for price discrimination. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46, 1–19.
Balvers, R., & Szerb, L. (1996). Location in the Hotelling duopoly model with demand uncertainty. European Economic Review, 40(7), 1453–1461.
Tremblay, C. H., & Tremblay, V. J. (2011). The Cournot-Bertrand model and the degree of product differentiation. Economics Letters, 111(3), 233–235.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.
Chaudhuri, A., Datta, P. P., Fernandes, K. J., & Xiong, Y. (2021). Optimal pricing strategies for manufacturing-as-a service platforms to ensure business sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, 108065.
Li, H., & Cao, E. (2021). Competitive crowdfunding under asymmetric quality information. Annals of Operations Research, 1–32.
The first author would like to acknowledge the partial grants support to the research (71731009, 72061127002, 2018WZDXM020); The third co-author would like to acknowledge the partial grants support to the research (71732006,91546119), as well as the support from Shenzhen Key Research Base in Arts & Social Sciences (Intelligent Management & Innovation Research Center--IMIRC, SusTech, Shenzhen); The fourth co-author would like to acknowledge the partial grants support to the research (71722014,17BGL032), as well as the support from the National Laboratory of Mechanical Manufacture System, XJTU.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, X., Lu, H., Huang, W. et al. Investment decisions and pricing strategies of crowdfunding players: In a two-sided crowdfunding market. Electron Commer Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09510-y
- Two-sided market
- Investment decision
- Pricing choice
- Hotelling model
- Stackelberg model