Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploitative or explorative innovation? An event study of cloud computing business value

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms may invest in cloud computing for exploitative or explorative innovation. Exploitative innovation oriented cloud computing investments impact the firms' core business limitedly while the investments for explorative innovation bring the firms both more opportunities and risks such as complex integration with multiple participants. Different enterprises should invest in cloud computing for different orientations according to their situations so as to fully realize the business value. This study examines how the business value of cloud computing is contingent on the investment orientations and the contextual factors of firm characteristics. Taking 183 Chinese listed companies adopted cloud computing as the research sample, we conduct event study methodology to investigate the business value of cloud computing regarding the focal firms' objectives and characteristics including organizational inertia, innovation capability and industry types. The results show that the business value of cloud investment for explorative innovation is more positive than that for exploitative innovation especially for the innovative firms with weak organizational inertia in non-service industries. Meanwhile, achievement of cloud computing business value is complementary to overcoming organizational inertia and promoting innovation capability. This study extends the boundary of business value research of cloud computing and provides references for cloud investment decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman, S. J., Kesterson-Townes, L., Marshall, A., & Srivathsa, R. (2012). How cloud computing enables process and business model innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 40(4), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xue, L., Ray, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firm’s IT asset portfolio. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loukis, E., Janssen, M., & Mintchev, I. (2019). Determinants of software-as-a-service benefits and impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 117, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iyer, B., & Henderson, J. C. (2012). Business value from clouds: learning from users. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dean, D., & Saleh, T. (2009). Capturing the value of cloud computing. The Boston Consulting Group (Vol. 426, pp. 1–10). The Boston Consulting Group.

  9. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, N., Nevo, S., Kou, G., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2019). Impact of the strategic role of IT on explorative and exploitative innovation activities: The role of environmental uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 51(3), 542–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loukis, E., Kyriakou, N., Pazalos, K., & Popa, S. (2017). Inter-organizational innovation and cloud computing. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Q., Wang, C., Wu, J., Li, J., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2011). Towards the business–information technology alignment in cloud computing environment: An approach based on collaboration points and agents. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(11), 1038–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mingxing, S., Long, P., & Yanan, F. Empirical study on alignment of cloud computing in enterprises. In 2015 international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery, 2015 (pp. 268–272). IEEE.

  14. Parameswaran, S., Venkatesan, S., Gupta, M., Sharman, R., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Impact of cloud computing announcements on firm valuation. Paper presented at the AMCIS, Detroit.

  15. Son, I., Lee, D., Lee, J.-N., & Chang, Y. B. (2014). Market perception on cloud computing initiatives in organizations: An extended resource-based view. Information & Management, 51(6), 653–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malladi, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2012). Cloud computing adoption and its implications for CIO strategic focus—An empirical analysis. Paper presented at the ICIS, Orlando.

  17. Bruque-Cámara, S., Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Maqueira-Marín, J. M. (2016). Supply chain integration through community cloud: Effects on operational performance. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 22(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malladi, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2012). Does Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has a role in IT-enabled innovation? An empirical analysis. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2012.

  19. Dos Santos, B. L., Peffers, K., & Mauer, D. C. (1993). The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Im, K. S., Dow, K. E., & Grover, V. (2001). Research report: A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm—An event study methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oh, W., Kim, J. W., & Richardson, V. J. (2006). The moderating effect of context on the market reaction to IT investments. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishant, R., Teo, T. S. H., & Goh, M. (2017). Do shareholders value green information technology announcements? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(8), 542–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oh, W., Gallivan, M. J., & Kim, J. W. (2006). The market’s perception of the transactional risks of information technology outsourcing announcements. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(4), 271–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Armbrust, M., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, J. G., & Alter, A. E. (2010). Cloudrise: rewards and risks at the dawn of cloud computing (Vol. 20). Accenture.

  26. Etro, F. (2011). The economics of cloud computing. The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, 9(2), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McAfee, A. (2011). What every CEO needs to know about the cloud. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qian, R., & Palvia, P. (2013). Towards an understanding of cloud computing's impact on organizational IT strategy. In AMCIS 2013.

  29. Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Eze, U., & Lee, H. (2019). The effect of IT ambidexterity and cloud computing absorptive capacity on competitive advantage. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(3), 613–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khayer, A., Bao, Y., & Nguyen, B. (2020). Understanding cloud computing success and its impact on firm performance: An integrated approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(5), 963–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brynjolfsson, E., Hofmann, P., & Jordan, J. (2010). Cloud computing and electricity: Beyond the utility model. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 32–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aral, S., Sundararajan, A., & Xin, M. (2010). Developing competitive advantage in the cloud: Qualitative findings. Harvard Business Review Blogs.

  33. Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Han, K., Oh, W., Im, K. S., Chang, R. M., Oh, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2012). Value cocreation and wealth spillover in open innovation alliances. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsidulko, J. (2015). The 10 biggest cloud outages of 2015 (so far). In J. Tsidulko (Ed.). CRN.

  36. Liu, S., Yang, Y., Qu, W. G., & Liu, Y. (2016). The business value of cloud computing: The partnering agility perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(6), 1160–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Battleson, D. A., West, B. C., Kim, J., Ramesh, B., & Robinson, P. S. (2016). Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Freeman, H. J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Benlian, A., Kettinger, W., Sunyaev, A., & Winkler, T. J. (2018). The transformative value of cloud computing: A decoupling, platformization, and recombination theoretical framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), 719–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dehning, B., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kyriakou, N., & Loukis, E. Cloud computing business value and human determinants: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic conference on informatics, Larisa, 2017 (p. 11). ACM.

  43. Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang, H. C., Lai, M. C., Lin, L. H., & Chen, C. T. (2013). Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial marketing management, 33(5), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International journal of production economics, 133(2), 662–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kranz, J. J., Hanelt, A., & Kolbe, L. M. (2016). Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change—The case of on-premise and cloud-computing software. Information Systems Journal, 26(5), 477–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Son, I., Lee, D., Lee, J.-N., & Chang, Y.-B. (2011). Understanding the impact of IT service innovation on firm performance: The case of cloud computing. Paper presented at the PACIS, Brisbane.

  49. Yang, Y., Ray Qing, C., & Schniederjans, D. (2017). Cloud computing and its impact on service level: A multi-agent simulation model. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), 4341–4353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Velamuri, V. K., Bansemir, B., Neyer, A.-K., & Möslein, K. M. (2013). Product service systems as a driver for business model innovation: Lessons learned from the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1340004-1-1340004–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Teo, T. S. H., Nishant, R., & Koh, P. B. L. (2016). Do shareholders favor business analytics announcements? The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(4), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in organizational behavior, 171–222.

  57. Brook, J. W., Feltkamp, V., & van der Meer, M. (2014). Cloud enabled business model innovation: Gaining strategic competitive advantage as the market emerges. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 9(2), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Joshi, K. D., Chi, L., Datta, A., & Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 472–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ranganathan, C., & Brown, C. V. (2006). ERP investments and the market value of firms: Toward an understanding of influential ERP project variables. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Raymond, L., Bergeron, F., & Croteau, A. M. (2013). Innovation capability and performance of manufacturing SMEs: The paradoxical effect of IT integration. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ganter, A., & Hecker, A. (2013). Deciphering antecedents of organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu, Y., Dong, S., Wei, J., & Tong, Y. (2020). Assessing cloud computing value in firms through socio-technical determinants. Information & Management, 57(8), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Huntgeburth, J., Förderer, J., Ebertin, C., & Veit, D. (2013). How cloud computing impacts stock market prices. Paper presented at the international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Germany.

  66. Bian, Y., Kang, L., & Zhao, J. L. (2020). Dual decision-making with discontinuance and acceptance of information technology: The case of cloud computing. Internet Research, 30(5), 1521–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71331003), Jiangsu Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security (CN) (Grant No. 2017SJB1090) and Graduate Research and Innovation Program from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. YCX16B-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China

    Zhenghua Li, Nianxin Wang & Shilun Ge

Authors
  1. Zhenghua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nianxin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shilun Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenghua Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Wang, N. & Ge, S. Exploitative or explorative innovation? An event study of cloud computing business value. Electron Commer Res 22, 1467–1490 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09473-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09473-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation