Modeling social learning on consumers’ long-term usage of a mobile technology: a Bayesian estimation of a Bayesian learning model
- 337 Downloads
Studies on how social influence impacts individuals’ social learning during the technology adoption process have increased over the last few decades. However, few studies have examined the social learning effects on individual consumers’ learning at the post-adoption stage, or long-term usage. The present study intends to fill this gap. We construct a Bayesian learning model to investigate consumers’ learning process at the post-adoption stage and how social learning effects influence individuals’ learning at this stage. The model result shows that, among the two social learning effects, influential peer effects (early adopters) are not significantly different from general peer effects at the post-adoption stage; i.e., users no longer treated early adopters differently from general peers. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies that investigates social learning effects on consumers’ learning at the post-adoption stage by using a Bayesian learning model, which uncovers the underlying mechanism of people’s long-term use of technology.
KeywordsIndividual learning Social learning Bayesian learning Post-adoption Social influence Bayesian estimation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- 5.Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
- 6.Casella, G., & George, E. (1992). Explaining the Gibbs sampler. American Statistician, 46, 167–174.Google Scholar
- 10.Ching, A. T., Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (2017). Empirical models of learning dynamics: A survey of recent developments. In B. Wierenga & R. van der Lans (Eds.), Handbook of marketing decision models (Vol. 254)., International series in operations research & management science Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.DeGroot, M. H. (1970). Optimal statistical decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 15.Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- 17.Hao, H., Padman, R., & Telang, R. (2011). An empirical study of opinion leader effects on mobile information technology adoption in healthcare. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2011, 537.Google Scholar
- 18.Hao, H., Padman, R., Sun, B., & Telang, R. (2014). Examining the social influence on information technology sustained use in a community health system: A hierarchical Bayesian learning method analysis. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2751–2758).Google Scholar
- 30.Riedl, C., & Seidel, V. P. (2018) Learning from mixed signals in online innovation communities. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1219.
- 32.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 33.Rossi, P. E., Allenby, G., & McCulloch, R. (2006). bayesian statistics and marketing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar