Online consumer reviews play an important role in shaping potential customers’ purchase decisions in e-commerce. Previous studies have analyzed the influence of online consumer reviews on sales, mainly considering factors such as reviewers’ and viewers’ profiles, information provided, and product features. However, there are relatively few studies that discuss how online consumer reviews interact with each other and how consumers’ opinions evolve over time. This paper proposes an opinion evolution dynamics model that is applicable to online consumer reviews in the e-commerce environment by taking into account influencing factors such as viewer reading limits, review sorting and releasing strategies, convergence parameters, review posting possibilities, and confidence thresholds. Using multi-agent simulation based on the proposed opinion evolution dynamics model, the paper discusses how these factors affect viewers’ opinions, and the opinion evolution process itself. Finally, conclusions and managerial implications of the simulation results are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2010). Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 809–832.
Pee, L. G. (2016). Customer co-creation in B2C e-commerce: Does it lead to better new products? Electronic Commerce Research, 4(6), 1–27.
Dou, X., Walden, J. A., Lee, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1555–1563. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.015.
Bao, D., Dong, D., & Meng, X. (2011). Parasocial interaction between browser and poster in virtual communities: An empirical study on dianping.com. Chinese Journal of Management, 8(7), 1010–1020.
Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201–214. doi:10.1007/s10799-008-0041-2.
Lee, J., Park, D. H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004.
Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.2.133.
Fan, Y. W., & Miao, Y. F. (2012). Effect of electronic word-of-mouth on consumer purchase intention: The perspective of gender differences. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 10(3), 175–181.
Cui, G., Lui, H. K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39–58.
Shao, K. (2012). The effects of controversial reviews on product sales performance: The mediating role of the volume of word of mouth. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(4), 32–38. doi:10.5539/ijms.v4n4p32.
Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001.
Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313.
Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512. doi:10.1109/tkde.2010.188.
Purnawirawan, N., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Balance and sequence in online reviews: The wrap effect. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 71–98.
Pumawirawan, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & Dens, N. (2012). Balance and sequence in online reviews: How perceived usefulness affects attitudes and intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing (Mergent, Inc.), 26(4), 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.04.002.
Li, H. Z., Lin, L. Z., Sun, H., et al. (2008). The Sznajd model with team work. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 19(4), 549–555.
Vannucchi, F. S., & Prado, C. P. C. (2009). Sznajd model and proportional elections: The role of the topology of the network. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 20(6), 979–990.
Ru, W., & Xu, C. A. I. (2008). The strong consensus opinion dynamics on adaptive networks. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 19(12), 1939–1947.
Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3(4), 87–98.
Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3), 1–33.
Fortunato, S., et al. (2004). Universality of the threshold for complete consensus for the opinion dynamics of Deffuant. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 15(9), 1301–1307.
Fortunato, S. (2005). On the consensus threshold for the opinion dynamics of Krause–Hegselmann. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 16(2), 259–270.
Etesami, S. R., & Basar, T. (2015). Game-theoretic analysis of the Hegselmann–Krause model for opinion dynamics in finite dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(7), 1886–1897.
Zhou, X., Chen, B., Liu, L., Ma, L., & Qiu, X. G. (2015). An opinion interactive model based on individual persuasiveness. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2015(4), 1–10.
Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting particle systems (Vol. 276). New York: Springer.
Galam, S. (2002). Minority opinion spreading in random geometry. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 25(4), 403–406.
He, M., Li, B. E. I., & Luo, L. (2004). Sznajd model with “social temperature” and defender on small-world networks. International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, 15(7), 997–1003.
Sousa, A. (2005). Consensus formation on a triad scale-free network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 348, 701–710.
Elgazzar, A. (2003). Applications of small-world networks to some socio-economic systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 324(1), 402–407.
Quattrociocchi, W., Caldarelli, G., & Scala, A. (2014). Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence. Scientific Reports, 4(4938), 1–7.
Bernardes, A. T., Stauffer, D., & Kertész, J. (2002). Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 25(1), 123–127.
Sznajd-Weron, K. (2005). Sznajd model and its applications. Acta Physica Polonica B, 36(8), 2537–2547.
Galland, S., Knapen, L., Gaud, N., Janssens, D., Lamotte, O., Koukam, A., et al. (2014). Multi-agent simulation of individual mobility behavior in carpooling. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 45, 83–98.
Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2011). Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386.
Godes, D., & Silva, J. C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473.
Mochon, D., & Schwartz, J. (2014). The individual dynamics of online reviews. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 613–614.
Chen, Y., Fay, S., & Wang, Q. (2011). The role of marketing in social media—How online consumer reviews evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 85–94.
Wan, Y. (2015). The Matthew effect in social commerce: The case of online review helpfulness. Electronic Markets, 25(4), 313–324.
This work was supported by the Humanities and Social Science Project of the Ministry of Education of China (13YJA630084), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71471019, 71402007, 71201011, 71473143), the Doctoral Scientific Fund Project of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 20120005120001), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (No. TP2015031).
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, Y., Ma, B. & Pan, Y. Opinion evolution of online consumer reviews in the e-commerce environment. Electron Commer Res 18, 291–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9258-7
- Opinion evolution
- Online consumer review
- Opinion dynamics
- Multi-agent simulation