Static and Dynamic Green’s Functions in Peridynamics

Linjuan Wang; Jifeng Xu; Jianxiang Wang

doi:10.1007/s10659-016-9583-4

Journal of Elasticity

January 2017, Volume 126, Issue 1, pp 95–125 | Cite as

Static and Dynamic Green’s Functions in Peridynamics

Authors
Authors and affiliations

Linjuan Wang
Jifeng Xu
Jianxiang Wang

Article

First Online: 02 June 2016

620 Downloads
4 Citations

Abstract

We derive the static and dynamic Green’s functions for one-, two- and three-dimensional infinite domains within the formalism of peridynamics, making use of Fourier transforms and Laplace transforms. Noting that the one-dimensional and three-dimensional cases have been previously studied by other researchers, in this paper, we develop a method to obtain convergent solutions from the divergent integrals, so that the Green’s functions can be uniformly expressed as conventional solutions plus Dirac functions, and convergent nonlocal integrals. Thus, the Green’s functions for the two-dimensional domain are newly obtained, and those for the one and three dimensions are expressed in forms different from the previous expressions in the literature. We also prove that the peridynamic Green’s functions always degenerate into the corresponding classical counterparts of linear elasticity as the nonlocal length tends to zero. The static solutions for a single point load and the dynamic solutions for a time-dependent point load are analyzed. It is analytically shown that for static loading, the nonlocal effect is limited to the neighborhood of the loading point, and the displacement field far away from the loading point approaches the classical solution. For dynamic loading, due to peridynamic nonlinear dispersion relations, the propagation of waves given by the peridynamic solutions is dispersive. The Green’s functions may be used to solve other more complicated problems, and applied to systems that have long-range interactions between material points.

Keywords

Green’s function Peridynamics Nonlocality Integro-differential equation

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

82B21 74A99 45A05 45B05

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 11521202. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments and suggestions improved the technical content of this work. The authors also thank Professors Minzhong Wang, Kefu Huang and Shaoqiang Tang of Peking University for helpful discussions.

Appendix A: Peridynamic Material Parameters

Peridynamic material parameters can be determined by equating the strain energy density from the peridynamic theory to that of classical continuum theory [32]. By this approach (following [32]), the peridynamic parameters for one-dimensional and two-dimensional domains are derived as follows.

A.1 PD Material Parameters for One-Dimensional Deformation

The peridynamic material parameters can be determined by considering an infinitely long bar subjected to a uniform deformation of $s=\zeta $. This uniform deformation can be a stretch, a torsion or a shear. The micropotential for this loading is

$$ w=\frac{1}{2}C(\xi )\xi^{2}\zeta^{2}. $$

(A.1)

Thus, the peridynamic strain energy density can be expressed as

$$ W=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathcal {H}} \biggl( \frac{1}{2}C(\xi )\xi^{2} \zeta ^{2} \biggr) \mathrm{d}\xi = \frac{1}{4}\zeta^{2} \int_{\mathcal {H}}C( \xi )\xi^{2}\mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.2)

For the same deformation condition, the strain energy density based on the classical linear theory is

$$ W=\frac{1}{2}\varLambda \zeta^{2}, $$

(A.3)

where $\varLambda $ is the classical material parameter as listed in Table 1. By equating the strain density Eq. (A.2) to Eq. (A.3), the peridynamic material parameters can be determined by the following equation:

$$ \varLambda =\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathcal {H}}C ( \xi ) \xi^{2} \mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.4)

A.2 PD Material Parameters for Two-Dimensional Deformation

In an infinite domain, the displacements of material points $\boldsymbol{x}'$ and $\boldsymbol{x}$ are represented by $\boldsymbol{u}'$ and $\boldsymbol{u}$, respectively. The relative position vector is $\boldsymbol{\xi }=\boldsymbol{x}'- \boldsymbol{x}$ and the relative displacement vector is $\boldsymbol{\eta }=\boldsymbol{u}'- \boldsymbol{u}$. Then the micropotential can be evaluated as

$$ w=\frac{1}{2}\boldsymbol{\eta }\cdot \boldsymbol{C} ( \boldsymbol{\xi } ) \cdot \boldsymbol{\eta }. $$

(A.5)

The PD material parameters for two-dimensional plane-strain or plane-stress deformation can be determined by considering two different loading conditions. We take the derivation of the parameters for the plane-stress deformation as an example.

In the first loading condition, an isotropic expansion is applied to an infinite domain. In other words, all PD bonds is subjected to a uniform stretch $s=\zeta $, that is, $\boldsymbol{\eta }=\zeta \boldsymbol{\xi }$ for all the PD bonds. Using Eq. (A.5) and Eq. (35), the corresponding micropotential is equal to

$$ w=\frac{1}{2}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4} \zeta^{2}. $$

(A.6)

The peridynamic strain energy density for this deformation can be evaluated as

$$ W=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathcal {H}} \biggl( \frac{1}{2}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4}\zeta^{2} \biggr) \mathrm{d}A_{\boldsymbol{\xi }} = \frac{\pi }{2}\zeta ^{2}\int_{0}^{l}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5}\mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.7)

Based on linear elasticity, the strain energy density becomes

$$ W=\frac{E}{1-\nu }\zeta^{2}. $$

(A.8)

The equality of the two quantities leads to the following relation

$$ \frac{E}{1-\nu }=\frac{\pi }{2}\int_{0}^{l} \lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5}\mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.9)

In the second loading condition, an infinite domain is subjected to a pure shear loading of $\gamma_{xy}=\zeta /2$, that is, all PD bonds are subjected to stretches of $\varepsilon_{xx}=\zeta $, $\varepsilon_{yy}=- \zeta $. For material points $\boldsymbol{x}'$ and $\boldsymbol{x}$, the relative displacement under this loading is $u'_{x}-u_{x}=\zeta \xi_{x}$ and $u'_{y}-u_{y}=-\zeta \xi_{y}$. Assume that the angle between the relative position vector $\boldsymbol{\xi }$ and the $x$-axis is $\theta $. The relative displacement vector can be expressed as

$$ \boldsymbol{\eta }= \bigl[ \bigl( u'_{x}-u_{x} \bigr) \cos \theta + \bigl( u'_{y}-u _{y} \bigr) \sin \theta \bigr] \boldsymbol{\xi }. $$

(A.10)

Due to $\xi_{x}=\xi \cos \theta $ and $\xi_{y}=\xi \sin \theta $, Eq. (A.10) becomes

$$ \boldsymbol{\eta }=\zeta \bigl( \cos^{2}\theta - \sin^{2}\theta \bigr) \boldsymbol{\xi }. $$

(A.11)

By substituting Eq. (A.10) into Eq. (A.5), the micropotential for this pure shear deformation is

$$ w=\frac{1}{2}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4} \zeta^{2} \bigl( \cos^{2} \theta -\sin^{2}\theta \bigr) ^{2}. $$

(A.12)

Then the peridynamic strain energy density is

$$ W=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathcal {H}} \biggl[ \frac{1}{2}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4}\zeta^{2} \bigl( \cos^{2}\theta - \sin^{2}\theta \bigr) ^{2} \biggr] \mathrm{d}A_{\boldsymbol{\xi }} =\frac{\pi }{4}\zeta^{2}\int_{0}^{l} \lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5}\mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.13)

The strain energy density of classical theory is

$$ W=\frac{E}{1+\nu }\zeta^{2}. $$

(A.14)

Equating Eq. (A.13) to Eq. (A.14) leads to

$$ \frac{E}{1+\nu }=\frac{\pi }{4}\int_{0}^{l} \lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5}\mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.15)

Combining Eq. (A.9) with Eq. (A.15) results in $\nu =\frac{1}{3}$ and

$$ E=\frac{\pi }{3}\int_{0}^{l}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5} \mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.16)

As for plane-strain deformation, the PD parameters can be obtained with the same derivation process through replacing $\nu $ with $\frac{ \nu }{1-\nu }$ and $E$ with $\frac{E}{1-\nu^{2}}$. Thus, the parameters for the plane-strain deformation satisfy $\nu =\frac{1}{4}$ and

$$ E=\frac{5\pi }{16}\int_{0}^{l}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{5} \mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(A.17)

Appendix B: Calculation of Tensor $M( \boldsymbol{k}) $

We need to calculate the following two tensors:

$$ \boldsymbol{M} ( \boldsymbol{k} ) = \int _{\mathcal {H}}\boldsymbol{C} ( \boldsymbol{\xi } ) ( 1-\cos \boldsymbol{k}\cdot \boldsymbol{\xi } ) \mathrm{d}A_{\boldsymbol{\xi }} $$

(B.1)

and

$$ \boldsymbol{M} ( \boldsymbol{k} ) = \int _{\mathcal {H}}\boldsymbol{C} ( \boldsymbol{\xi } ) ( 1-\cos \boldsymbol{k}\cdot \boldsymbol{\xi } ) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{\xi }}. $$

(B.2)

For the second tensor, Silling [6] first gave the solution in the special case of $\boldsymbol{k}=\boldsymbol{e}_{1}$, and the solution for the general case has also been obtained by Weckner et al. [27]. The approach of Weckner et al. [27] is not suitable for the first tensor, so it has not been calculated. Now we adopt a new method to solve the second tensor in spherical coordinates. Then the first tensor can be solved in polar coordinates in the same way.

Inspired by the solutions of Silling [6], we find that the tensor $M ( \boldsymbol{k} ) $ is easily obtained when the direction of vector $\boldsymbol{k}$ is parallel to any of the base vectors of an orthonormal basis $\{ \boldsymbol{e}_{1},\boldsymbol{e}_{2},\boldsymbol{e}_{3} \} $. Therefore, by coordinate transformation, we establish a new orthonormal basis $\{ \boldsymbol{e}'_{1},\boldsymbol{e}'_{2},\boldsymbol{e}'_{3} \} $ and make the new base vector $\boldsymbol{e}'_{1}$ parallel to the vector $\boldsymbol{k}$. The new orthonormal basis can be expressed as

$$ \left [ \textstyle\begin{array}{c} \boldsymbol{e}'_{1} \\ \boldsymbol{e}'_{2} \\ \boldsymbol{e}'_{3} \\ \end{array}\displaystyle \right ] =\boldsymbol{D}\left [ \textstyle\begin{array}{c} \boldsymbol{e}_{1} \\ \boldsymbol{e}_{2} \\ \boldsymbol{e}_{3} \\ \end{array}\displaystyle \right ] , $$

(B.3)

where

$$ \boldsymbol{D} =\left [ \textstyle\begin{array}{c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c} \frac{k_{1}}{k} & \frac{k_{2}}{k} & \frac{k_{3}}{k} \\ \frac{k_{2}}{\sqrt{k_{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}}} & \frac{-k_{1}}{\sqrt{k _{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}}} & 0 \\ \frac{k_{1}k_{3}}{k\sqrt{k_{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}}} & \frac{k_{2}k_{3}}{k\sqrt{k _{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}}} & \frac{-\sqrt{k_{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}}}{k} \\ \end{array}\displaystyle \right ] . $$

(B.4)

The components of the vector $\boldsymbol{\xi }$ in the two sets of orthonormal bases satisfy the following relations:

$$ \left [ \textstyle\begin{array}{c} \xi_{1} \\ \xi_{2} \\ \xi_{3} \\ \end{array}\displaystyle \right ] =\boldsymbol{D}^{\mathrm{T}}\left [ \textstyle\begin{array}{c} \xi '_{1} \\ \xi '_{2} \\ \xi '_{3} \\ \end{array}\displaystyle \right ] . $$

(B.5)

We first calculate the component $M_{11}$ as follows

$$ \begin{aligned}[b] M_{11}&= \int_{0}^{l} \int_{0}^{\pi }\int_{0}^{2\pi }\lambda ( \xi ) \xi_{1}^{2} \bigl( 1-\cos ( k\xi \cos \theta ) \bigr) \xi^{2}\sin \theta \mathrm{d}\phi \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\xi \\ &= \frac{k_{1}^{2}}{k^{2}}M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{III}}+ \biggl( 1- \frac{k _{1}^{2}}{k^{2}} \biggr) M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}} , \end{aligned} $$

(B.6)

where

$$ M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{III}}=\int_{0}^{l} \int_{0}^{\pi }\int_{0} ^{2\pi }\lambda ( \xi ) ( \xi \cos \theta ) ^{2} \bigl( 1-\cos ( k\xi \cos \theta ) \bigr) \xi^{2}\sin \theta \mathrm{d}\phi \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\xi $$

(B.7)

and

$$ M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}}=\int_{0}^{l} \int_{0}^{\pi }\int_{0} ^{2\pi }\lambda ( \xi ) ( \xi \sin \theta \cos \phi ) ^{2} \bigl( 1-\cos ( k\xi \cos \theta ) \bigr) \xi^{2}\sin \theta \mathrm{d}\phi \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\xi . $$

(B.8)

Eq. (B.5) has been used in the above derivation. $M_{\Vert } ^{\mathrm{III}}$ and $M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}}$ can be easily calculated, as shown by Silling [6]. Similarly, the other components are calculated and the component form of tensor $\boldsymbol{M} ( \boldsymbol{k} ) $ is finally expressed as

$$ M_{im}=M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}} \delta_{im}+\frac{k_{i}k_{m}}{k^{2}} \bigl( M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{III}}-M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}} \bigr) , $$

(B.9)

for which

$$\begin{aligned} M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{III}}&=4\pi \int_{0}^{l} \lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4}A_{1}^{\mathrm{III}} ( k\xi ) \mathrm{d}\xi , \end{aligned}$$

(B.10)

$$\begin{aligned} M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{III}}&=4\pi \int_{0}^{l} \lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{4}A_{2}^{\mathrm{III}} ( k\xi ) \mathrm{d}\xi , \end{aligned}$$

(B.11)

$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}^{\mathrm{III}} ( k\xi ) &=\frac{1}{3}- \frac{\sin ( k \xi ) }{k\xi }-\frac{2\cos ( k\xi ) }{ ( k\xi ) ^{2}} +\frac{2\sin ( k\xi ) }{ ( k\xi ) ^{3}} , \end{aligned}$$

(B.12)

$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}^{\mathrm{III}} ( k\xi ) &=\frac{1}{3}+ \frac{\cos ( k \xi ) }{ ( k\xi ) ^{2}} -\frac{\sin ( k\xi ) }{ ( k\xi ) ^{3}}. \end{aligned}$$

(B.13)

For the first tensor in (B.1), the above method is adopted and a new orthonormal basis $\{ \boldsymbol{e}'_{1},\boldsymbol{e}'_{2} ) $ is established with $\boldsymbol{e}'_{1}$ parallel to the vector $\boldsymbol{k}$. The component form of the tensor in (B.1) is finally given as

$$ M_{im}=M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{II}} \delta_{im}+\frac{k_{i}k_{m}}{k^{2}} \bigl( M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{II}}-M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{II}} \bigr) , $$

(B.14)

for which

$$\begin{aligned} & \begin{aligned}[b] M_{\Vert }^{\mathrm{II}}&= \int_{0}^{l}\int_{0}^{2\pi }\lambda ( \xi ) ( \xi \cos \theta ) ^{2} \bigl( 1-\cos ( k \xi \cos \theta ) \bigr) \xi \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\xi \\ &= 2\pi \int_{0}^{l}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{3}A_{1} ( k \xi ) \mathrm{d}\xi , \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

(B.15)

$$\begin{aligned} & \begin{aligned}[b] M_{\bot }^{\mathrm{II}}&= \int_{0}^{l}\int_{0}^{2\pi }\lambda ( \xi ) ( \xi \sin \theta ) ^{2} \bigl( 1-\cos ( k \xi \cos \theta ) \bigr) \xi \mathrm{d}\theta \mathrm{d}\xi \\ &= 2\pi \int_{0}^{l}\lambda ( \xi ) \xi^{3}A_{2} ( k \xi ) \mathrm{d}\xi , \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

(B.16)

$$\begin{aligned} & A_{1}^{\mathrm{II}} ( k\xi ) =\frac{1}{2}- \mathrm{J}_{0} ( k \xi ) +\frac{\mathrm{J}_{1} ( k\xi ) }{k\xi } , \end{aligned}$$

(B.17)

$$\begin{aligned} & A_{2}^{\mathrm{II}} ( k\xi ) =\frac{1}{2}- \frac{\mathrm{J} _{1} ( k\xi ) }{k\xi }. \end{aligned}$$

(B.18)

Appendix C: Betti’s Reciprocal Theorem, Somigliana Formula and Boundary Integral Equation in Peridynamics

By the definitions of a nonlocal divergence operator and a nonlocal gradient operator in [33], and the concept of peridynamic stress tensor in [34], we can obtain

$$ \int_{\varOmega } ( \boldsymbol{u}\cdot \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{v}-\boldsymbol{v}\cdot \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u} ) \mathrm{d}V= \int_{\partial \varOmega } \bigl( \boldsymbol{u} \cdot \boldsymbol{\tau }(\boldsymbol{v})-\boldsymbol{v}\cdot \boldsymbol{\tau }(\boldsymbol{u}) \bigr) \mathrm{d}S , $$

(C.1)

in which $\boldsymbol{u}$ and $\boldsymbol{v}$ are any vector fields; $\tau $ is the surface traction due to the vector field $\boldsymbol{u}$ or $\boldsymbol{v}$. $\varOmega $ is the reference configuration of a closely bounded body with the boundary $\partial \varOmega $. ℒ represents the peridynamic linear operator

$$ \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}\equiv \int _{\mathcal {H}}\boldsymbol{C} ( \boldsymbol{\xi } )\cdot \bigl[ \boldsymbol{u} ( \boldsymbol{x}+\boldsymbol{\xi },t ) -\boldsymbol{u} ( \boldsymbol{x},t ) \bigr] {\mathrm{d}}V_{\boldsymbol{\xi }} . $$

(C.2)

Eq. (C.1) is the Betti’s reciprocal theorem in peridynamics. The derivation is as follows.

The nonlocal divergence operator $\mathcal{D}$ on $\boldsymbol{\beta}$ is defined as [33]

$$ {\mathcal{D}}(\boldsymbol{\beta }) (\boldsymbol{x})\equiv \int_{\mathcal{H}} \bigl(\boldsymbol{\beta } ( \boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}' )+ \boldsymbol{\beta } ( \boldsymbol{x}',\boldsymbol{x} )\bigr)\cdot \boldsymbol{\alpha} (\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}') \mathrm{d} V_{\boldsymbol{x}'} , $$

(C.3)

in which $\boldsymbol{\beta}(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}')$ is a tensor, and $\boldsymbol{\alpha}$ is an antisymmetric vector, i.e., $\boldsymbol{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{x}',\boldsymbol{x}) = -\boldsymbol{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}')$. The adjoint operator corresponding to $\mathcal{D}$ is defined as [33]

$$ {\mathcal{D}}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u}) (\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}')\equiv -\bigl( \boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x}')-\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x}) \bigr) \otimes \boldsymbol{\alpha} ( \boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}' ). $$

(C.4)

If $\boldsymbol{\beta}$ is a second-order tensor, based on (C.3) and (C.4), there is

$$ \mathcal{D}(\boldsymbol{u}\cdot \boldsymbol{\beta}) = \boldsymbol{u}\cdot \mathcal{D}(\boldsymbol{\beta})- \int_{\mathcal{H}}\mathcal{D}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u}): \boldsymbol{\beta} \bigl(\boldsymbol{x}',\boldsymbol{x}\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}'}. $$

(C.5)

For linear elasticity in peridynamics, $\boldsymbol{\beta} (\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}')$ is expressed as $\boldsymbol{\beta} (\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}') = \boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u})$. $\boldsymbol{\varTheta}$ is a fourth-order tensor satisfying $\boldsymbol{\varTheta} (\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}') = \boldsymbol{\varTheta} (\boldsymbol{x}', \boldsymbol{x})$ with the symmetry ${\varTheta}_{ijkl} = {\varTheta}_{klij} = {\varTheta}_{jikl} = {\varTheta}_{ijlk}$, which is similar to the classical stiffness tensor. Then

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{D}\bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u})\bigr) &=-2 \int_{\mathcal{H}} \bigl\{ \boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \bigl[\bigl(\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x}')-\boldsymbol{u} (\boldsymbol{x})\bigr) \otimes \boldsymbol{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}')\bigr]\bigr\} \cdot \boldsymbol{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}')\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}'} \\ &=-2\int_{\mathcal{H}} \bigl[\boldsymbol{\alpha}\bigl(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}'\bigr) \cdot\boldsymbol{\varTheta}\cdot\boldsymbol{\alpha} \bigl(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}'\bigr)\bigr]\cdot \bigl(\boldsymbol{u}\bigl(\boldsymbol{x}'\bigr)-\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}'}, \end{aligned}$$

(C.6)

in which the symmetry of $\boldsymbol{\varTheta}$ has been used. Comparing Eq. (C.6) with Eq. (C.2), we can get

$$ \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}= -\mathcal{D}\bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}:\mathcal{D}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u})\bigr), $$

(C.7)

where

$$ \boldsymbol{C} (\boldsymbol{\xi}) =2\boldsymbol{\alpha } ( \boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{x}') \cdot \boldsymbol{\varTheta } \cdot\boldsymbol{\alpha} ( \boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}' ), $$

(C.8)

with $\boldsymbol{\xi}= \boldsymbol{x}' - \boldsymbol{x}$. Thus, the linear elastic micromodulus Eq. (75) is retrieved by choosing

$$ \begin{aligned} & \boldsymbol{\alpha } ( \boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{x}' ) = \frac{\boldsymbol{\xi}}{ \vert \boldsymbol{\xi} \vert ^{2} }, \\ &\boldsymbol{\varTheta }=\frac{1}{2}\lambda \bigl(\vert\boldsymbol{\xi}\vert\bigr) (\boldsymbol{\xi}\otimes \boldsymbol{\xi}\otimes\boldsymbol{\xi}\otimes\boldsymbol{\xi}) . \end{aligned} $$

(C.9)

The peridynamic force flux vector or surface traction at a point $\boldsymbol{x}$ is given by [34]

$$ \boldsymbol{\tau}(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{n})= \boldsymbol{\nu}(\boldsymbol{x})\cdot \boldsymbol{n}, $$

(C.10)

in which $\boldsymbol{\nu}(\boldsymbol{x})$ is the peridynamic stress tensor defined in [34], and $\boldsymbol{n}$ denotes the unit normal vector of a plane. It is proved in [34] that

$$ \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}=\nabla\cdot \boldsymbol{\nu}(\boldsymbol{u}), $$

(C.11)

where $\boldsymbol{\nu}(\boldsymbol{u})$ represents the stress field corresponding to the displacement field $\boldsymbol{u}$. Combining Eqs. (C.7) and (C.11), we can obtain the following relation by the Gauss theorem:

$$ \int_{{\varOmega}} \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} = -\int_{{\varOmega}} \mathcal{D}\bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*}(\boldsymbol{u})\bigr)\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} =\int_{{\varOmega}}\nabla\cdot \boldsymbol{\nu}(\boldsymbol{u})\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} =\int_{\partial{\varOmega}} \boldsymbol{\nu}\cdot \boldsymbol{n} \mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{x}} =\int_{\partial{\varOmega}}\boldsymbol{\tau}(\boldsymbol{u})\mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{x}}. $$

(C.12)

For any displacement vector filed $\boldsymbol{v}$, we can get

$$\begin{aligned} \int_{\varOmega} \boldsymbol{v}\cdot \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u} \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} &=-\int_{\varOmega} \boldsymbol{v}\cdot \mathcal{D} \bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*} (\boldsymbol{u})\bigr)\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} \\ &=\int_{\partial\varOmega} \boldsymbol{v}\cdot\boldsymbol{\tau}(\boldsymbol{u})\mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{x}} -\int_{\varOmega}\int_{\mathcal{H}}\mathcal{D}^{*} (\boldsymbol{v}):\bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*} (\boldsymbol{u})\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}'}\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}}, \end{aligned}$$

(C.13)

where Eqs. (C.5), (C.7) and (C.12) have been used. Exchanging $\boldsymbol{v}$ and $\boldsymbol{u}$ leads to

$$ \int_{\varOmega} \boldsymbol{u}\cdot \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{v} \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}} =\int_{\partial\varOmega} \boldsymbol{u}\cdot\boldsymbol{\tau} (\boldsymbol{v}) \mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{x}} - \int_{\varOmega}\int_{\mathcal{H}} \mathcal{D}^{*} (\boldsymbol{u}): \bigl(\boldsymbol{\varTheta}: \mathcal{D}^{*} (\boldsymbol{u})\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}'}\mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{x}}. $$

(C.14)

Due to the symmetry of the last term of Eq. (C.13) or Eq. (C.14) with respect to $\boldsymbol{u}$ and $\boldsymbol{v}$, subtracting Eq. (C.13) from Eq. (C.14) leads to the Betti’s reciprocal theorem in Eq. (C.1).

In the Betti’s reciprocal theorem Eq. (C.1), let $\boldsymbol{u}$ be the Green’s function of the infinite domain, that is,

$$ \bigl(\mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}^{K}\bigr)_{i} =\delta_{iK}\delta (\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{x}_{0}). $$

(C.15)

The superscript $K$ denotes the direction of the point force. Substituting Eq. (C.15) into Eq. (C.1) and changing $\boldsymbol{x}_{0}$ to $\boldsymbol{x}$ lead to the Somigliana formula of peridynamics,

$$ \boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x}) \cdot \boldsymbol{e}^{K} = \int_{\partial\varOmega} \bigl[\boldsymbol{u}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x})\cdot \boldsymbol{\tau}(\boldsymbol{x})- \boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{\zeta}) \cdot \boldsymbol{\tau}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x})\bigr] \mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{\zeta}} + \int_{\varOmega} \bigl(\boldsymbol{u}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x}) \cdot \boldsymbol{b}(\boldsymbol{\zeta})\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}, $$

(C.16)

in which $\boldsymbol{e}^{K}$ is the base vector in the direction of the point force, and the static governing equation $\mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{u}+\boldsymbol{b} = 0$ has been used.

If the point $\boldsymbol{x}$ is on the smooth boundary $\partial\varOmega$, the integral $\int_{\varOmega} (\boldsymbol{u}\cdot \mathcal{L}\boldsymbol{v})\mathrm{d}V$ is equal to half of that when the point is not on the boundary. Thus the boundary integral equation in peridynamics is

$$ \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})\cdot \boldsymbol{e}^{K} = \int_{\partial\varOmega} \bigl[\boldsymbol{u}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x})\cdot \boldsymbol{\tau}(\boldsymbol{x})-\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{\zeta}) \cdot \boldsymbol{\tau}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x})\bigr] \mathrm{d}S_{\boldsymbol{\zeta}} + \int_{\varOmega} \bigl(\boldsymbol{u}^{K} (\boldsymbol{\zeta}-\boldsymbol{x})\cdot \boldsymbol{b}(\boldsymbol{\zeta})\bigr) \mathrm{d}V_{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}. $$

(C.17)

From Eq. (C.17), the unknown displacement $\boldsymbol{u}$ on the boundary can be calculated from the given traction $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ on the boundary; if the traction $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ is unknown, it can be calculated from the given displacement $\boldsymbol{u}$. Then, using the determined boundary displacement and traction, one can obtain the displacement field in the region $\varOmega$ by the Somigliana formula (C.16).

References

1.
Bazant, Z.P., Jirasek, M.: Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. J. Eng. Mech. 128(11), 1119–1149 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Silling, S.A.: Origin and effect of nonlocality in a composite. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 9(2), 245–258 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.
Kröner, E.: Elasticity theory of materials with long range cohesive forces. Int. J. Solids Struct. 3, 731–742 (1967) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
4.
Eringen, A.C.: Linear theory of nonlocal elasticity and dispersion of plane-waves. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10(5), 425–435 (1972) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
5.
Eringen, A.C., Edelen, D.G.B.: Nonlocal elasticity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10(3), 233–248 (1972) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
6.
Silling, S.A.: Reformation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and longrange force. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48(1), 175 (2000) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
7.
Silling, S.A., Epton, M., Weckner, O., Xu, J., Askari, E.: Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J. Elast. 88(2), 151–184 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
8.
Gerstle, W., Sau, N., Silling, S.A.: Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237(12–13), 1250–1258 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.
Xu, J., Askari, A., Weckner, O., Silling, S.: Peridynamic analysis of impact damage in composite laminates. J. Aerosp. Eng. 21(3), 187–194 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.
Kilic, B., Agwai, A., Madenci, E.: Peridynamic theory for progressive damage prediction in center-cracked composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 90(2), 141–151 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.
Oterkus, E., Madenci, E.: Peridynamic analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 7(1), 45–84 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.
Taylor, M., Steigmann, D.J.: A two-dimensional peridynamic model for thin plates. Math. Mech. Solids 20(8), 998–1010 (2015) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
13.
Silling, S.A., Lehoucq, R.B.: Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. Adv. Appl. Mech. 44(44), 73–168 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.
Oterkus, S., Madenci, E., Agwai, A.: Peridynamic thermal diffusion. J. Comput. Phys. 265, 71–96 (2014) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
15.
Sun, S., Sundararaghavan, V.: A peridynamic implementation of crystal plasticity. Int. J. Solids Struct. 51(19–20), 3350–3360 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.
Oterkus, S., Madenci, E., Agwai, A.: Fully coupled peridynamic thermomechanics. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 64, 1–23 (2014) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
17.
Chen, Z., Bobaru, F.: Peridynamic modeling of pitting corrosion damage. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 78, 352–381 (2015) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.
Jabakhanji, R., Mohtar, R.H.: A peridynamic model of flow in porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 78, 22–35 (2015) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.
Emmrich, E., Weckner, O.: Analysis and numerical approximation of an integrodifferential equation modeling non-local effects in linear elasticity. Math. Mech. Solids 12(4), 363–384 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
20.
Gunzburger, M., Lehoucq, R.B.: A nonlocal vector calculus with application to nonlocal boundary value problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 8(5), 1581–1598 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
21.
Zhou, K., Du, Q.: Mathematical and numerical analysis of linear peridynamic models with nonlocal boundary conditions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48(5), 1759–1780 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
22.
Du, Q., Zhou, K.: Mathematical analysis for the peridynamic nonlocal continuum theory. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 45(2), 217–234 (2011) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
23.
Du, Q., Gunzburger, M., Lehoucq, R.B., Zhou, K.: A nonlocal vector calculus, nonlocal volume-constrained problems, and nonlocal balance laws. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23(3), 493–540 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
24.
Silling, S.A., Zimmermann, M., Abeyaratne, R.: Deformation of a peridynamic bar. J. Elast. 73(1–3), 173–190 (2003) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
25.
Weckner, O., Abeyaratne, R.: The effect of long-range forces on the dynamics of a bar. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53(3), 705–728 (2005) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
26.
Emmrich, E., Weckner, O.: The peridynamic equation and its spatial discretisation. Math. Model. Anal. 12(1), 17–27 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
27.
Weckner, O., Brunk, G., Epton, M.A., Silling, S.A., Askari, E.: Green’s functions in non-local three-dimensional linear elasticity. Proc. R. Soc. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 465(2111), 3463–3487 (2009) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
28.
Mikata, Y.: Analytical solutions of peristatic and peridynamic problems for a 1d infinite rod. Int. J. Solids Struct. 49(21), 2887–2897 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.
Pan, E., Chen, W.: Static Green’s Functions in Anisotropic Media. Cambridge University Press, New York (2015) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
30.
Schwartz, L.: Théorie des Distributions. Hermann, Paris (1966) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
31.
Kilic, B.: Peridynamic theory for progressive failure prediction in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials. PhD thesis, University of Arizona (2008) Google Scholar
32.
Oterkus, E.: Peridynamic theory modeling three-dimensional damage growth in metallic and composite structures. PhD thesis, University of Arizona (2010) Google Scholar
33.
Du, Q., Gunzburger, M., Lehoucq, R.B., Zhou, K.: Analysis and approximation of nonlocal diffusion problems with volume constraints. SIAM Rev. 54(4), 667–696 (2012) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
34.
Lehoucq, R.B., Silling, S.A.: Force flux and the peridynamic stress tensor. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56(4), 667–696 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Linjuan Wang
- 1
Jifeng Xu
- 3
Jianxiang Wang
- 1
- 2
Email author

1.State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex System, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingP.R. China
2.CAPT, HEDPS and IFSA Collaborative Innovation Center of MoEPeking UniversityBeijingP.R. China
3.Beijing Aeronautical Science and Technology Research InstituteBeijingP.R. China

Static and Dynamic Green’s Functions in Peridynamics

Abstract

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Notes

Acknowledgements

References

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article