Skip to main content
Log in

Variational Characterization of a Quasi-rigid Body

  • Published:
Journal of Elasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rigidity of a body usually is characterized by the kinematical assumption that the mutual distance between any two of its particles remains unaltered in any possible deformation. However, from this alone nothing can be said about the internal contact forces exerted between adjacent sub-bodies. Therefore, the determination and form of an internal state of stress for a rigid body is problematical. Here, we will show that by considering such a kinematical characterization as an internal constraint for an elastic body, the constrained body inherits the mechanical structure of the elastic parent theory, i.e., the internal constraint generates an associated set of Lagrange multiplier fields which can be interpreted as an internal constraint reaction pseudo-stress field with the same structure as the state of stress in the parent elastic body. Thus, although the final deformation is the same for both the rigid body and the rigidly constrained elastic body, the latter corresponds to a richer model and, to emphasize this distinction, we refer to it as a quasi-rigid body. While in equilibrium the pseudo-stress field of a quasi-rigid body will satisfy equations identical to the equilibrium equations for the stress field in the elastic parent theory, such equations are not, in general, sufficient to assure uniqueness. In order to overcome this indeterminacy, we consider the quasi-rigid body as the limit of a sequence of deformable bodies, where each member of the sequence is identified by a material parameter such that, as this parameter tends to infinity, the body to which it refers is rigidified. Our approach is variational, i.e., we consider a sequence of minimization problems for hyperelastic bodies whose elastic strain energy is multiplied by a penalty term, say 1/ε . As ε→ 0, body distortions are more and more penalized so that the sequence of the displacement fields tends to a rigid displacement field, whereas the sequence of the associated stress fields tends to a definite non-zero limit. It will be shown that among all pseudo-stress fields that satisfy the equilibrium equations for the quasi-rigid body, the unique limit of the sequence as ε→0 minimizes a functional analogous to the complementary energy functional in classical linearized elasticity. This result permits its unique determination without having to consider the whole sequence of penalty problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, R.A.: Sobolev Spaces. Academic, New York (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball, J.: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in non-linear elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63, 337–403 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Capriz, G., Podio-Guidugli, P.: A generalization of Signorini’s perturbation method suggested by two problems of Grioli. Rend. Semin. Mat. Padova 68, 149–162 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciarlet, P.G.: Mathematical Elasticity, Vol. 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duvaut, G., Lions, J.L.: Les Inèquations in Mèchanique et en Physique. Dunod, Paris (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Multiple natural states for an elastic isotropic material with polyconvex stored energy. J. Elast. 60, 223–231 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G.: The Lagrange multipliers and hyperstress constraint reactions in incompressible multipolar elasticity theory. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 1627–1647 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A penalty interpretation for the Lagrange multiplier fields in incompressible multipolar elasticity theory. Math. Mech. Solids 10, 389–413 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Stress as a constraint reaction in rigid bodies. J. Elast. 74, 265–276 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Grioli, G.: On the stress in rigid bodies. Meccanica 18, 3–7 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurtin, M.: An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics. Academic, London (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. James, R.D., Rizzoni, R.: Piece-wise rigid body mechanics. J. Nonlinear Sci. 13, 65–114 (2003)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Knops, R.J., Trimarco, C., Williams, H.T.: Uniqueness and complementary energy in nonlinear elastostatic. Meccanica 38, 519–534 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Marzano, S., Podio-Guidugli, P.: Materiali elastici approssimativamente vincolati. Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 73, 1–19 (1985)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Oden, J.T.: Qualitative Methods in Non-linear Mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Podio-Guidugli, P.: A primer in elasticity. J. Elast. 58, 1–104 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Simo, J.C., Taylor, R.L.: Penalty function formulations for incompressible nonlinear elastostatics. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. 35, 107–118 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Truesdell, C., Noll, W.: The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics, 2nd edition. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Royer-Carfagni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G. Variational Characterization of a Quasi-rigid Body. J Elasticity 87, 211–238 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9104-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9104-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

Navigation