Abstract
The sugar beet crop is essential for the production of refined sugar in Morocco. It is cultivated in four large areas (Gharb, Tadla, Doukalla, and Moulouya). A reported reduction in efficacy for fungicide treatments led to an in vitro sensitivity study of isolates collected in 2017 and 2018 from sugar beet areas. After authentication of the pathogen by specific primers amplifying 959 pb of the actin gene of Cercospora beticola Sacc, the inhibition tests on a modified medium by different fungicide molecules belonging to three groups (benzimidazole, demethylation inhibitors, and quinone outside inhibitors) were carried out. Measurement of inhibition allowed the calculation of EC50, which showed that resistance is present in isolates collected for the three fungicide groups with different levels by group and year. All isolates were resistant to thiophanate methyl (EC50 > 5 ppm) in 2017 and 2018. At least 70% of the isolates (in 2018) were resistant to azoxystrobin (EC50 > 10 ppm) and at least 68% of the isolates (in 2018) were resistant to difenoconazole (EC50 > 0.01 ppm). In parallel, in vivo tests on three sites in the Gharb area were conducted during 2017 and 2018 to monitor the severity of Cercospora beticola on the host under different fungicide treatments (thiophanate methyl, chlorothalonil, tetraconazole, epoxiconazole, difenoconazole, penthiopyrad, azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, and Pythium oligandrum) by measuring the area under the disease progress curve. The fungicide molecules all had better efficacy in preventive treatment, with the best results for trifloxystrobin, difenoconazole, and epoxiconazole. In curative treatment, three molecules stood out: trifloxystrobin, difenoconazole, and penthiopyrad.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are available.
References
Anesiadis, T., Karaoglanidis, G. S., & Tzavella-Klonari, K. (2003). Protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae. Journal of Phytopathology, 151, 647–651.
Balau, A. M., & Faretra, F. (2010). Molecular method for detection of Cercospora beticola Sacc. Lucrăriştiinţifice (Seria Agronomie), 53(1), 1–3.
Bolton, M., Birla, K., Rivera-Varas, V., Rudolph, K. D., & Secor, G. A. (2012). Characterization of CbCyp51 from field isolates of Cercospora beticola. Phytopathology, 102, 298–305.
Dafang, H., & Shuzhi, W. X. Z. (1982). Studies on resistance of Cercospora beticola to benzimidazole fungicides. Journal of Plant Protection, 2, 11.
Délye, C., & Corio-Costet, M. F. (1998). Origin of primary infections of grape powdery mildew Uncinula necator : RAPD analysis discriminates two biotypes. Mycological Research, 102, 283–288.
Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13–15.
El Housni, Z., Ezrari, S., Tahiri, A., & Ouijja, A. (2020). Resistance of Cercospora beticola Sacc isolates to thiophanate methyl (benzimidazole), demethylation inhibitors and quinone outside inhibitors in Morocco. EPPO Bulletin, 50(2), 350–357.
Ezrari, S., Lahlali, R., Radouane, N., Tahiri, A., Asfers, A., Boughalleb-M’Hamdi, N., ... & Lazraq, A. (2021). Characterization of Fusarium species causing dry root rot disease of citrus trees in Morocco. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 128(2), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00392-0
Ezzahiri, B. (2013). Guide de protection phytosanitaire de la betterave à sucre au Maroc. AMPP, 1ère édition.
Franc, G. D. (2010). Ecology and epidemiology of Cercospora beticola. In R. T. Lartey et al. (Eds.), Cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet and related species (pp. 7–19). The American Phytopathological Society.
Franc, G. D., Harveson, R. M., Kerr, E. D., & Jacobsen, B. J. (2001). Disease management. In Sugarbeet Production Guide. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension EC01–156 (pp. 131–160). University of Nebraska.
Georgopoulos, S., & Dovas, C. (1973). A serious outbreak of strains of Cercospora beticola resistant to benzimidazole fungicides in northern Greece. Plant Disease Report, 57, 321–324.
Harveson, R. M. (2013). Cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet. NebGuide.
Holtschulte, B. (2000). Cercospora beticola worldwide distribution and incidence. In M. J. C. Asher, B. Holtschulte, R. Molard, F. Rosso, G. Steinruecken, & R. Beckers (Eds.), Advances in sugar beet research: Cercospora beticola Sacc. Biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet (Vol. 2, pp. 5–16).
Jacobsen, B. J. (2010). Integrated management of Cercospora leaf spot. In R. T. Lartey, J. J. Weiland, L. Panella, P. W. Crous, & C. E. Windels (Eds.), Cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet and related species (pp. 275–284). The American Phytopathological Society.
Jacobsen, B. J., & Franc, G. D. (2009). Cercospora leaf spot. In R. M. Harveson, L. E. Hanson, & G. L. Hein (Eds.), Compendium of beet diseases and pests (2nd ed.).
Karadimos, D. A., & Karaoglanidis, G. S. (2006). Comparative efficacy, selection of effective partners, and application time of strobilurin fungicides for control of cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet. Plant Disease, 90(6), 820–825.
Karaoglanidis, G. S., & Bardas, G. (2006). Control of benzimidazole-and DMI-resistant strains of Cercospora beticola with strobilurin fungicides. Plant Disease, 90(4), 419–424.
Karaoglanidis, G. S., Ioannidis, P. M., & Thanassoulopoulos, C. C. (2000). Reduced sensitivity of Cercospora beticola to sterol-demethylation inhibiting fungicides. Plant Pathology, 49, 567–572.
Karaoglanidis, G. S., Ioannidis, P. M., & Thanassoulopoulos, C. C. (2001). Influence of fungicide spray schedules on the sensitivity of Cercospora beticola to the sterol demethylation-inhibiting fungicide flutriafol. Crop Protection, 20(10), 941–947.
Karaoglanidis, G. S., Karadimos, D. A., Ioannidis, P. M., & Ioannidis, P. I. (2003). Sensitivity of Cercospora beticola populations to fentin-acetate, benomyl and flutriafol in Greece. Crop Protection, 22(5), 735–740.
Kayamori, M., Shimizu, M., Yamana, T., Komatsu, T., Minako, S., Shinmura, A., ... & Yasuoka, S. (2020). First report of QoI resistance in Cercospora beticola in sugar beet in Japan. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 86(2), 149–153.
Kerr, E. D., & Weiss, A. (1990). Fungicide efficacy and yield responses to fungicide treatments based on predictions of Cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 27, 58–71.
Khan, M. F. (2015). Sugar beet diseases: Cercospora leaf spot. In Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens (pp. 379–387). Springer.
Khan, J., Del Río, L. E., Nelson, R., & Khan, M. F. R. (2007). Improving the Cercospora leaf spot management model for sugar beet in Minnesota and North Dakota. Plant Disease, 91(9), 1105–1108.
Lartey, R. T., Weiland, J. J., & Bucklin-Comiskey, S. (2003). A PCR protocol for rapid detection of Cercospora beticola in sugarbeet tissues. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 40(1/2), 1–10.
Meriggi, P., Rosso, F., Ioannides, P. M., & Ayala Garcia, J. (2000). Fungicide treatments against Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Advances in Sugar Beet Research IIRB, 2, 77–102.
Muellender, M. M., Mahlein, A. K., Stammler, G., & Varrelmann, M. (2020). Evidence for the association of target-site resistance in cyp51 with reduced DMI sensitivity in European Cercospora beticola field isolates. Pest Management Science, 77(4), 1765–1774.
ONSSA. (n.d.). Office National de Securité Sanitaire des Produits Alimentaires. http://eservice.onssa.gov.ma/IndPesticide.aspx
Pethybridge, S. J., Vaghefi, N., & Kikkert, J. R. (2017). Management of Cercospora leaf spot in conventional and organic table beet production. Plant Disease, 101(9), 1642–1651.
Piszczek, J., Pieczul, K., & Kiniec, A. (2018). First report of G143A strobilurin resistance in Cercospora beticola in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) in Poland. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 125(1), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-017-0119-3
Pool, V. W., & McKay, M. B. (1916). Climatic conditions as related to Cercospora beticola Sacc. Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 21–60.
Rossi, V., Meriggi, P., Biancardi, E., & Rosso, F. (2000). Effect of Cercospora leaf spot on sugar beet growth, yield and quality. In M. J. C. Asher, B. Holtschulte, M. Richard Molard, F. Rosso, G. Steinruecken, & R. Beckers (Eds.), Advances in sugar beet research Vol. 2:Cercospora beticola Sacc. Biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet (pp. 49–76). International Institute for Beet Research.
Ruppel, E. G. (1986). Cercospora leaf spot. In E. D. Whitney & J. E. Duffus (Eds.), Compendium of beet diseases and insects (pp. 8–9). American Phytopathological Society.
Ruppel, E., & Scott, P. (1974). Strains of Cercospora beticola resistant to benomyl in the USA. Plant Disease Report, 58, 434–436.
Schnabel, G., Amiri, A., & Brannen, P. M. (2012). Field kit-and internet-supported fungicide resistance monitoring. In T. S. Thind (Ed.), Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection Risk and Management (pp. 116–132). CAB International.
Secor, G. A., Rivera, V. V., Khan, M. F. R., & Gudmestad, N. C. (2010). Monitoring fungicide sensitivity of Cercospora beticola of sugar beet for disease management decisions. Plant Disease, 94(11), 1272–1282.
Smith, G. A., & Martin, S. S. (1978). Differential response of sugar beet cultivars to Cercospora leaf spot disease. Crop Science, 18, 39–41.
Smith, G. A., & Ruppel, E. G. (1973). Association of Cercospora leaf spot, gross sucrose, percentage sucrose, and root weight in sugar beet. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 53, 695–696.
Sombardier, A., Dufour, M. C., Blancard, D., & Corio-Costet, M. F. (2010). Sensitivity of Podosphaera aphanis isolates to DMIs fungicides: Distribution and reduced cross-resistance. Pest Management Science, 66, 35–43.
Takenaka, S., & Tamagake, H. (2009). Foliar spray of a cell wall protein fraction from the biocontrol agent Pythium oligandrum induces defence-related genes and increases resistance against leaf spot in sugar beet. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 75(5), 340–348.
Trkulja, N., Ivanovic, Ž., Pfaf-Dolovac, E., Dolovac, N., Mitrovic, M., Toševski, I., & Jovic, J. (2013). Characterisation of benzimidazole resistance of Cercospora beticola Sacc in Serbia using PCR-based detection of resistance-associated mutations of the ß-tubulin gene. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 135, 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0135-x
Trkulja, N., Milosavljević, A., Stanisavljević, R., Mitrović, M., Jović, J., Toševski, I., & Bošković, J. (2015). Occurrence of Cercospora beticola populations resistant to benzimidazoles and demethylation-inhibiting fungicides in Serbia and their impact on disease management. Crop Protection, 75, 80–87.
Trueman, C. L., & Burlakoti, R. R. (2014). Evaluation of products for management of Cercospora leaf spot in sugarbeet, 2014. Plant Dis Manag Rep., 9, FC009.
Trueman, C., Hanson, L., Somohano, P., & Rosenzweig, N. (2017). First report of DMI-insensitive Cercospora beticola on sugar beet in Ontario, Canada. New Disease Reports, 36, 20.
Verreet, J. A., Wolf, P., & Weis, F. J. (1996). Bekämpfungsschwellen als Grundlage für eine integrierte Bekämpfung von Cercospora beticola–Das IPS-Modell Zuckerrübe. Proceedings of the IIRB, 59, 55–69.
Weiland, J., & Koch, G. (2004). Sugarbeet leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.). Molecular Plant Pathology, 5(3), 157–166.
Wolf, P. F. J., & Verreet, J. A. (2002). An integrated pest management system in Germany for the control of fungal leaf diseases in sugar beet: The IPM sugar beet model. Plant Disease, 86(4), 336–344.
Wolf, P. F. J., & Verreet, J. A. (2005). Factors affecting the onset of Cercospora leaf spot epidemics in sugar beet and establishment of disease-monitoring thresholds. Phytopathology, 95, 269274.
Wong, F. P., & Wilcox, W. F. (2000). Distribution of baseline sensitivities to azoxystrobin among isolates of Plasmopara viticola. Plant Disease, 84, 275–281.
Wong, F. P., & Wilcox, W. F. (2002). Sensitivity to azoxystrobin among isolates of Uncinula necator : Baseline distribution and relationship to myclobutanil sensitivity. Plant Disease, 86, 394–404.
Code availability
We have the code for our statistical software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial interests
The authors declare they have no financial interests.
Competing interests
Authors declares that they has no conflict of interest or competing interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Supplementary Information
Table S1
EC50 calculation for 22 isolates of Cercospora beticola in Morocco in response for thiophanate methyl (TM), azoxystrobin (AZ), trifloxystrobin (TR), tetraconazole (TT), epoxiconazole (EP), difenoconazole (DF) for 2017. (DOCX 15 kb)
Table S2
EC50 calculation for 20 isolates of Cercospora beticola in Morocco in response for thiophanate methyl (MT), azoxystrobin (AZ), trifloxystrobin (TR), tetraconazole (TT), epoxiconazole (EP), difenoconazole (DF) for 2018. (DOCX 17 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
El Housni, Z., Tahiri, A., Ezrari, S. et al. Occurrence of Cercospora beticola Sacc populations resistant to benzimidazole, demethylation-inhibiting, and quinone outside inhibitors fungicides in Morocco. Eur J Plant Pathol 165, 73–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02589-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02589-5