European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 144, Issue 2, pp 383–397 | Cite as

Geographic distribution and aggressiveness of Harpophora maydis in the Iberian peninsula, and thermal detection of maize late wilt

  • C. M. Ortiz-Bustos
  • L. Testi
  • A. B. García-Carneros
  • L. Molinero-RuizEmail author


Late wilt (causal agent Harpophora maydis), with initial symptoms appearing around flowering, has become frequent in maize fields of the Iberian Peninsula. The geographical distribution of the pathogen in the main maize - growing areas in the South of Portugal and Spain was determined by prospecting 59 fields from 2009 to 2013. Among all the isolates of H. maydis identified, 14 isolates were molecularly confirmed by ITS amplification, and their pathogenic traits (i.e. aggressiveness) were analyzed by inoculation of the maize susceptible cultivar PR32W86 grown in pots under shade-house conditions for the whole growing season. One of the isolates was highly aggressive, causing intense symptoms as well as significant reductions in weight of both aboveground parts and roots. Moderately aggressive isolates caused significantly high disease values but not all of them were related to reductions in plant weight. The infection by H. maydis was monitored by measurements of canopy temperature and crop water stress index of maize. Canopy temperature was assessed in potted control plants and in plants inoculated with the most aggressive isolate in two experiments conducted outdoors in 2012 and 2013. Both indices responded to the presence of fungal infection in both years, which was detected up to 17 days before development of symptoms in the plants. This study shows the wide distribution of H. maydis in the Iberian Peninsula and highlights the importance of genetic resistance for controlling the pathogen in southern Europe. In addition, the thermal detection of the infection prior to symptom development might lead to useful applications of non-destructive pre-symptomatic disease diagnosis in controlling late wilt disease in maize.


Corn Cephalosporium maydis Early diagnosis Soilborne pathogen Vascular wilt Zea mays L. 



Research partially supported by the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) (PIE200940I120). The authors are grateful to Monsanto Agricultura España SL, Pioneer Hi-Bred Agro Servicios Spain SL and Semillas Fitó for providing some of the samples of diseased maize plants.


  1. Abd El-Rahim, M. F., Fahmy, G. M., & Fahmy, Z. M. (1998). Alterations in transpiration and stem vascular tissues of two maize cultivars under conditions of water stress and late wilt disease. Plant Pathology, 47, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, J. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  3. Bergstrom, G., Leslie, J., Huber, D., Lipps, P., Warren, H., Esker, P., Grau, C., Botratynski, T., Bulluck, R., Floyd, J., Bennett, R., Bonde, M., Dunkle, L., Smith, K., Zeller, K., Cardwell, K., Daberkow, S., Bell, D., & Chandgoyal, T. (2008). Recovery plan for late wilt of corn caused by Harpophora maydis syn. Cephalosporium maydis. Washington, DC: National Plant Disease Recovery System.Google Scholar
  4. Bowden, R. L., & Rouse, D. I. (1991). Effects of Verticillium dahliae on gas exchange of potato. Phytopathology, 81, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calderón, R., Navas-Cortés, J. A., Lucena, C., & Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2013). High-resolution airborne hyperspectral and thermal imagery for early detection of verticillium wilt of olive using fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band spectral indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 139, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, C. L., & Madden, L. V. (1990). Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  7. Degani, O., & Cernica, G. (2014). Diagnosis and control of Harpophora maydis, the cause of late wilt in maize. Advances in Microbiology, 4, 94–105.Google Scholar
  8. Dimond, A. E. (1970). Biophysics and biochemistry of the vascular wilt syndrome. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 8, 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drori, R., Sharon, A., Goldberg, D., Rabinovitz, O., Levy, M., & Degani, O. (2013). Molecular diagnosis for Harpophora maydis, the cause of maize late wilt in Israel. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 52, 16–29.Google Scholar
  10. Eaton, F. M., & Belden, G. O. (1929). Leaf temperatures of cotton and their relation to transpiration, varietal differences, and yields. U.S.D.A Technical Bulletin, 91, 1–39.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrler, W. L. (1973). Cotton leaf temperatures as related to soil-water depletion and meteorological factors. Agronomy Journal, 65, 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Shafey, H. A., & Claflin, L. E. (1999). Late wilt. In D. G. White (Ed.), Compendium of corn diseases (pp. 43–44). St. Paul: APS Press.Google Scholar
  13. El-Shafey, H. A., El-Shorbagy, F. A., Khalil, I. I., & El-Assiuty, E. M. (1988). Additional sources of resistance to the late-wilt disease of maize caused by Cephalosporium maydis. Agricultural Research Review, 66, 221–230.Google Scholar
  14. Eyal, Z., & Blum, A. (1989). Canopy temperature as a correlative measure for assessing host response to Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Plant Disease, 73, 468–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gams, W. (2000). Phialophora and some similar morphologically little-differentiated anamorphs of divergent ascomycetes. Studies in Mycology, 45, 187–199.Google Scholar
  16. García-Carneros, A. B., Girón, I., & Molinero-Ruiz, L. (2012). Aggressiveness of Cephalosporium maydis causing late wilt of maize in Spain. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 77, 173–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Idso, S. B., Jackson, R. D., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J., & Hatfield, J. L. (1981). Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability. Agricultural Meteorology, 24, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Idso, S. B. (1982). Non-water-stressed baselines - a key to measuring and interpreting plant water-stress. Agricultural Meteorology, 27, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, R. D., Reginato, R. J., & Idso, S. B. (1977). Wheat canopy temperature: a practical tool for evaluating water requirements. Water Resources Research, 13, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, H. G. (1999). Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 95, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindenthal, M., Steiner, U., Dehne, H. W., & Oerke, E. C. (2005). Effect of downy mildew development on transpiration of cucumber leaves visualized by digital infrared thermography. Phytopathology, 95, 233–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorenzini, G., Guidi, L., Nali, C., Ciompi, S., & Soldatini, G. F. (1997). Photosynthetic response of tomato plants to vascular wilt diseases. Plant Science, 124, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molinero-Ruiz, M. L., Melero-Vara, J. M., & Mateos, A. (2010). Cephalosporium maydis, the cause of late wilt in maize, a pathogen new to Portugal and Spain. Plant Disease, 94, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oerke, E. C., Steiner, U., Dehne, H. W., & Lindenthal, M. (2006). Thermal imaging of cucumber leaves affected by downy mildew and environmental conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 2121–2132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parke, J. L., Oh, E., Voelker, S., Hansen, E. M., Buckles, G., & Lachenbruch, B. (2007). Phytophthora ramorum colonizes tanoak xylem and is associated with reduced stem water transport. Phytopathology, 97, 1558–1567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Passioura, J. B. (2006). The perils of pot experiments. Functional Plant Biology, 33, 1075–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Payak, M. M., Lal, S., Lilaramani, J., & Renfro, B. L. (1970). Cephalosporium maydis a new threat to maize in India. Indian Phytopathology, 23, 562–569.Google Scholar
  28. Pecsi, S., & Nemeth, L. (1998). Appearance of Cephalosporium maydis samra, sabet and hingorani in Hungary. Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, Universiteit Gent, 63, 873–877.Google Scholar
  29. Sabet, K. A., Zaher, A. M., Samra, A. S., & Mansour, I. M. (1970). Pathogenic behavior of Cephalosporium maydis and C. acremonium. Annals of Applied Biology, 66, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saleh, A. A., Zeller, K. A., Ismael, A. M., Fahmy, Z. M., El-Assiuty, E. M., & Leslie, J. F. (2003). Amplified fragment length polymorphism diversity in Cephalosporium maydis from Egypt. Phytopathology, 93, 853–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saleh, A. A., & Leslie, J. F. (2004). Cephalosporium maydis is a distinct species in the gaeumannomyces-harpophora species complex. Mycologia, 96, 1294–1305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Samra, A. S., Sabet, K. A., & Hingorani, M. K. (1963). Late wilt disease of maize caused by Cephalosporium maydis. Phytopathology, 53, 402–406.Google Scholar
  33. Singh, S. D., & Siradhana, B. S. (1987). Influence of some environmental conditions on the development of late wilt of maize induced by Cephalosporium maydis. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 17, 1–5.Google Scholar
  34. Soliman, F. H. S., & Sadek, S. E. (1998). Combining ability of new maize inbred lines and its utilization in the Egyptian hybrid program. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture of the University of Cairo Egypt, 50, 1–20.Google Scholar
  35. Testi, L., Goldhamer, D. A., Iniesta, F., & Salinas, M. (2008). Crop water stress index is a sensitive water stress indicator in pistachio trees. Irrigation Science, 26, 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waggoner, P. E., & Dimond, A. E. (1954). Reduction in water flow by mycelium in vessels. American Journal of Botany, 41, 637–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, M., Ling, N., Dong, X., Zhu, Y., Shen, Q., & Guo, S. (2012). Thermographic visualization of leaf response in cucumber plants infected with the soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 61, 153–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications (pp. 315–322). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zeller, K. A., Jurgenson, J. E., El-Assiuty, Z. M., & Leslie, J. F. (2000). Isozyme and amplified fragment length polymorphisms from Cephalosporium maydis in Egypt. Phytoparasitica, 28, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeller, K. A., Ismael, A. M., El-Assiuty, E. M., Fahmy, Z. M., & Bekheet, F. M. (2002). Relative competitiveness and virulence of four clonal lineages of Cephalosporium maydis from Egypt toward greenhouse-grown maize. Plant Disease, 86, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Ortiz-Bustos
    • 1
  • L. Testi
    • 2
  • A. B. García-Carneros
    • 1
  • L. Molinero-Ruiz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Crop ProtectionInstitute for Sustainable Agriculture, CSICCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyInstitute for Sustainable Agriculture, CSICCórdobaSpain

Personalised recommendations