Advertisement

European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 469–480 | Cite as

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici retardation through induction of defensive response in tomato plants using a liquid formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf1)

  • R. ManikandanEmail author
  • T. Raguchander
Article

Abstract

A liquid based Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf1) bioformulation was found to contribute the restriction of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato roots by inducing defence enzymes. Induction of defence enzymes such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenoloxidase (PPO), catalase, β-1,3 glucanase and super oxide dismutase (SOD), was studied in tomato plants pretreated with liquid as well as a talc based formulation of Pf1 challenged with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in glasshouse vegetable production systems. There were increased activities of PAL, PO, PPO, catalase and β-1 3-glucanases in tomato plants treated with a combined application of seedling dip + soil application + foliar spray of liquid and talc formulation of Pf1 when compared to pathogen inoculated and untreated healthy controls. The activities of the above enzymes started to increase at 3rd day, reached maximum levels on 8-9th day and thereafter declined gradually. Similarly, native polyacralamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis revealed that one to six isoforms of the defence enzymes each with a higher intensity were expressed in these treatments, whereas fewer isoforms with less intensity were noticed in inoculated controls. These results suggest that the retardation of the invasion of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato roots resulting from treatment with the liquid formulation of Pf1 was due to enhancement of activities of enzymes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway. These results suggest that induced systemic resistance occurred in the treated tomato plants.

Keywords

Fusarium wilt Bioformulation Isoforms Induced systemic resistance 

References

  1. Azevedo, R. A., Alas, R. M., Smith, R. J., & Lea, P. J. (1998). Response of antioxidant enzymes to transfer from elevated carbon dioxide to air and ozone fumigation, in the leaves and roots of wild-type and a catalase-deficient mutant of barley. Plant Physiology, 104, 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashan, Y. (1986). Significance of timing and level of inoculation with rhizosphere bacteria on wheat plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 18, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhamou, N., Gagne, S., Quere, D. L., & Dehbi, L. (2000). Bacterial-mediated induced resistance in cucumber: Beneficial effect of the endophytic bacterium Serratia plymuthica on the protection against infection by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology, 90, 45–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharathi, R., Vivekananthan, R., Harish, S., Ramanathan, A., & Samiyappan, R. (2004). Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Protection, 23, 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boller, T., & Mauch, F. (1988). Colorimetric assay for chitinase. Methods in Enzymology, 161, 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler, C., Van Montagu, M., & Inzé, D. (1992). Superoxide- dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce, R. J., & West, C. A. (1989). Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and isoperoxidase activity by pectic fragments in suspension cultures of castor bean. Plant Physiology, 91, 889–897.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaparro–Giraldo, A., Barata, R. M., Chabregas, S. M., Azevedo, R. A., & Silva–Filho, M. C. (2000). Soybean leghemoglobin targeted to potato chloroplasts influences growth and development of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 19, 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, C., Belanger, R. R., Benhamou, N., & Paullitz, T. C. (2000). Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Physiology and Molecular Plant Pathology, 56, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chet, I. (1987). Trichoderma - application, mode of action, and potential as a biocontrol agent of soilborne plant pathogenic fungi (Pages 137–160 In: Innovative approaches to Plant Disease Control., Ed). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Daayf, F., Bel-Rhlid, R., & Belanger, R. R. (1997). Methyl ester of p-coumaric acid: A phytoalexin-like compound from long English cucumber leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23, 1517–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Meyer, G., Audenaert, K., & Hofte, M. (1999). Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2-induced systemic resistance in tobacco depends on plant salicylic acid but is not associated with PR 1a expression. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 105, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickerson, D. P., Pascholati, S. F., Hagerman, A. E., Butler, L. G., & Nicholson, R. L. (1984). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and hydroxy cinnamate CoA ligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated with Helminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporium carbonum. Physiological Plant Pathology, 25, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobbelaere, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Okon, Y. (2003). Plant growth promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 22, 107–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duijff, B. J., Pouhair, D., Olivain, C., Alabouvette, C., & Lemanceau, P. (1998). Implication of systemic induced resistance in the suppression of fusarium wilt of tomato by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r and by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo47. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fages, J. (1994). Azospirillum inoculants and field experiments. In Y. Okon (Ed.), Azospirillum / Plant Associations (pp. 87–110). Florida, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Glick, B. R. (1995). The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 41, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, J. J., & Loake, G. J. (2000). Role of reactive oxygen intermediates and cognate redox signalling in disease resistance. Plant Physiology, 124, 21–29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ham, K. S, Kauffmann, S., Albersheim, P., & Darvill, A. G. (1991). Host-pathogen interactions. A soybean pathogenesis-related protein with β-1,3-glucanase activity releases phytoalexin elicitor-active heat-stable fragments from fungal cell walls. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction, 4, 545–552.Google Scholar
  21. Hammerschmidt, R., & Kuc, J. (1995). Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammerschmidt, R., Nuckles, E. M., & Kuc, J. (1982). Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiological Plant Pathology, 20, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harish, S. (2005). Molecular biology and diagnosis of Banana bunchy top virus and its management through induced systemic resistance. Ph.D. (Ag.,) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore-3, India. pp. 126Google Scholar
  24. Hegde, S. V. (2002). Liquid Biofertilizers in Indian Agriculture. Biofertilizer News Letter, 12, 17–22.Google Scholar
  25. Idriss, E. E., Makarewicz, O., Farouk, A., Rosner, K., Greiner, R., Bochow, H., Richter, T., & Borriss, R. (2002). Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plantgrowth-promoting effect. Microbiology, 148, 2097–2109.Google Scholar
  26. Jayaraman, K. S., Ramanuja, M. N., Vijayaraghavan, P. K., & Vaidyanathan, C. S. (1987). Oxidative enzyme in pearl millet. Food Chemistry, 24, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kandan, A., Ramiah, M., Radjacommare, R., Nandakumar, R., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2002). Induction of Phenylpropanoid metabolism by Pseudomonas fluorescens against tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato. Folia Microbiologica, 47(2), 121–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kloepper, J. W. (1992). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. In F. B. Metting Jr. (Ed.), Soil microbial ecology: applications in agricultural and environmental management (pp. 255–274). New York, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Kolombet, L. V., Zhigletsova, S. K., Kosarava, N. I., Bystron, E. V., Derbyshev, V. V., Krasonosa, S. P., & Schiler, D. (2008). Development of extended shelf life of liquid formulation of the bio fungicide Trichoderma asperellum. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leeman, M., Van Pelt, J. A., Den Ouden, F. M., Heinsbroek, M., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Schippers, B. (1995). Induction of systemic resistance against Fusarium wilt of radish by lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology, 85, 1021–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, L., Kloepper, J. W., & Tuzun, S. (1995a). Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against Fusarium wilt by plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria. Phytopathology, 85, 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, L., Kloepper, J. W., & Tuzun, S. (1995b). Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against bacterial leaf spot by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology, 85, 843–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manikandan, R., Saravanakumar, D., Rajendran, L., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2010). Standardization of liquid formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 for its efficacy against Fusarium wilt of tomato. Biological Control, 30, 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Maurhofer, M., Hase, C., Meuwly, P., Métraux, J. P., & Defago, G. (1994). Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas flourescens strain CHAO: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology, 84, 139–146Google Scholar
  36. Mayer, A. M., Harel, E., & Shaul, R. B. (1965). Assay of catechol oxidase a critical comparison of methods. Phytochemistry, 5, 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nandakumar, R., Babu, S., Viswanathan, R., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2001). Induction of systemic resistance in rice against sheath blight disease by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33, 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olivain, C., Alabouvette, C., & Steinberg, C. (2004). Production of a mixed inoculum of Fusarium oxysporum Fo47 and Pseudomonas fluorescens C7 to control Fusarium diseases. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan, Q., Te, Y. S., & Kuc, J. (1991). A technique for detection of chitinases, β-1,3- glucanases and protein patterns after single separation using PAGE or isoelectric focusing. Phytopathology, 81, 970–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan, S. Q., Ye, X. S., & Kuć, J. (1989). Direct detection of beta-1,3-glucanase isozymes on polyacrylamide electrophoresis and isoelectrofocusing gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 182(1), 136–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pieterse, C. M. I., van Wees, S. C. M., Hoffland, E., van Pelt, J. A., & van Loon, L. C. (1996). Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell, 8, 1225–1237.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Radjacommare, R. (2000). Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated systemic resistance in rice against sheath blight disease and leaffolder insect. M. Sc. (Ag.,) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-3, India. pp. 119Google Scholar
  43. Radjacommare, R., Kandan, A., Nandakumar, R., & Samiyappan, R. (2004). Association of the hydrolytic enzyme chitinase against Rhizoctonia solani in rhizobacteria-treated rice Plants. Journal of Phytopathology, 152, 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2002a). Enhancing resistance of tomato and hot pepper to Pythium diseases by seed treatment with fluorescent pseudomonads. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 108, 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2002b). Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Plant and Soil, 239, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramanathan, A., Samiyappan, R., & Vidhyasekaran, P. (2000). Induction of defense mechanisms in green gram leaves and suspension-cultured cells by Macrophomina phaseolina and its elicitors. Journal of Plant Disease and Protection, 107, 245–257.Google Scholar
  47. Reimers, P. J., Guo, A., & Leach, J. E. (1992). Increased activity of cationic peroxidase associated with an incompatible interaction between Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiology, 99, 1044–1050.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Saravanakumar, D., Lavanya, N., Muthumeena, K., Raguchander, T., & Samiyappan, R. (2009). Fluorescent pseudomonad mixtures mediate disease resistance in rice plants against sheath rot (Sarocladium oryzae) disease. Biocontrol, 54(2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scandalios, J. G. (1994). Regulation and properties of plant catalases. In C. H. Foyer & P. M. Mullineaux (Eds.), Causes of photo-oxidative stress and amelioration of defense systems in plants (pp. 275–316). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sindhu, J. S., Ravi, S., & Minocha, J. L. (1984). Peroxidase isozyme patterns in primary trisomics of pearl millet. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 68, 179–182.Google Scholar
  51. Singleton, P.W., Keyser, H. H., & Sande, E. S. (2002). Development and evaluation of liquid inoculants and nitrogen fixation of legumes in Vietnam. (ed.) D. Herridge, ACIAR Proceedings, 109e, pp. 52–66Google Scholar
  52. Srivastava, A. K., Singh, T., Jana, T. K., & Arora, D. (2001). Induced resistance and control of charcoal rot in Cicer arietinum (chickpea) by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Canadian Journal of Botany, 79, 787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sticher, L., Mauch-Mani, B., & Metraux, J. P. (1997). Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review Phytopathology, 35, 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torres, R., Usall, J., Teixido, N., Abadias, M., & Vinas, I. (2003). Liquid formulation of the biocontrol agent Candida sake by modifying water activity or adding protectants. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94, 330–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tronsmo, A., Klemsdal, S.S., Hayes, C.K., Lorito, M., & Harman, G. E. (1993). The role of hydrolytic enzymes produced by Trichoderma harzianum in biological control of plant diseases, Trichoderma reesei cellulases and other hydrolases. Enzyme structure, Biochemistry, Genetics and applications. Foundation for Biotechnological and Industrial Research, Fermentation Research, Helsinki, Finland, 8, 159–168Google Scholar
  56. van Peer, R., Niemann, G. J., & Schippers, B. (1991). Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS 417r. Phytopathology, 81, 728–734Google Scholar
  57. Vendan, R. T., & Thangaraju, D. (2006). Development and standardization of liquid formulation for Azospirillum bioinoculant. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 46(4), 379–387.Google Scholar
  58. Viswanathan, R., & Samiyappan, R. (1999). Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against red rot disease caused by Colletotrichum falcatum Went. in sugarcane. Proceedings of Sugar Technologist Association of India, 61, 24–39.Google Scholar
  59. Viswanathan, R., & Samiyappan, R. (2001). Antifungal activity of chitinase produced by some fluorescent pseudomonads against Colletotrichum falcatum Went causing red rot disease in sugarcane. Microbiological Research, 155, 309–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vivekananthan, R., Ravi, M., Ramanathan, A., & Samiyappan, R. (2004). Lytic enzymes induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens and other biocontrol organisms mediate defence against the anthracnose pathogen in mango. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zdor, R. E., & Anderson, A. J. (1992). Influence of root colonizing bacteria on the defense responses in bean. Plant and Soil, 140, 99–107.Google Scholar
  62. Zhu-Salzman, K., Jian -long, B., & Liu., T.-x. (2005). Molecular strategies of plant defense and insect counter-defense. Insect Science, 12, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection StudiesTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations