European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 129, Issue 2, pp 255–265 | Cite as

Site-specific field resistance of grapevine to Plasmopara viticola correlates to altered gene expression and was not modulated by the application of organic amendments

  • Barbara Thuerig
  • Ana Slaughter
  • Elaheh Marouf
  • Matthias Held
  • Brigitte Mauch-Mani
  • Lucius Tamm
Article

Abstract

The influence of site on resistance of grapevine (cv. Chasselas) to Plasmopara viticola was evaluated. Grapevine leaves from three vineyards in the region of Lake Neuchâtel (Switzerland) were tested for their susceptibility to P. viticola in the lab in five successive years (2004–2008), and the expression levels of four selected defence-related genes (Glucanase, Lipoxygenase 9, 9-cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, Stilbene synthase) were studied in 1 year. In all 5 years of examination, differences between sites were substantial. In four out of 5 years, plants from site Hauvernier were much less susceptible to P. viticola than plants from site Auvernier. In another year, differences were less pronounced but still significant for one leaf age. Susceptibility of plants from a third site (Concise) varied from year to year. Differences in the genetic background were excluded by microsatellite analysis. Differences in susceptibility were mirrored in the constitutive expression pattern of four defence-related genes, with samples from the Hauterive site clearly separated from samples of the other two sites in redundancy analysis. Furthermore, it was evaluated whether site-specific resistance can be modulated by agronomic practices such as the application of organic amendments. In two commercial vineyards (cv. Pinot noir), soils had either not (control) or yearly (compost) been amended with a compost for the last 9 years. Leaves from plants grown in any of the two treatments did not differ in their susceptibility to P. viticola in both years of examination. Additionally, under controlled conditions, none of 19 different composts amended to the substrate of grapevine seedlings or cuttings affected their susceptibility to P. viticola, but 8 out of 19 composts reduced severity in the control bioassay Arabidopsis thalianaHyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, indicating that a modulation of site-specific susceptibility of grapevine plants by organic amendments is at the very least, difficult.

Keywords

Compost Induced systemic resistance Soil Terroir Vitis vinifera 

References

  1. Ait Barka, E., Belarbi, A., Hachet, C., Nowak, J., & Audran, J.-C. (2000). Enhancement of in vitro growth and resistance to gray mould of Vitis vinifera co-cultured with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 186, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. (1996). Referenzmethoden der Schweizerischen Forschungsanstalten Agroscope—1. Bodenuntersuchungen zur Düngeberatung; Änderungen 1997–2009. Zürich-Reckenholz: Agroscope.Google Scholar
  3. Aziz, A., Poinssot, B., Daire, X., Adrian, M., Bézier, A., Lambert, B., et al. (2003). Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 16, 1118–1128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., Garcia-Agustin, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, F., et al. (2006). Priming: getting ready for the battle. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 19, 1062–1071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Downey, M. O., Dokoozlian, N. K., & Krstic, M. P. (2006). Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: a review of recent research. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, 257–268.Google Scholar
  6. Fuchs, J. G., Galli, U., Schleiss, K., & Wellinger, A. (2001). ASCP guidelines 2001. Quality criteria for composts and digestates from biodegradable waste management. Schönbühl: ASCP Association of Swiss Compost Plants in collaboration with the Swiss Biogas Forum.Google Scholar
  7. Fuchs, J. G., Bieri, M., & Chardonnes, M. (2004). Auswirkungen von Komposten und von Gärgut auf die Umwelt, die Bodenfruchtbarkeit, sowie die Pflanzengesundheit. Frick: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture.Google Scholar
  8. Haas, D., & Défago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 307–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamiduzzaman, M. M., Jakab, G., Barnavon, L., Neuhaus, J.-M., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2005). β-Aminobutyric acid-induced resistance against downy mildew in grapevine acts through the potentiation of callose formation and jasmonic acid signaling. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 18, 819–829.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Iandolino, A. B., Goes Da Silva, F., Lim, H., Choi, H., Williams, L. E., & Cook, D. R. (2004). High-quality RNA, cDNA, and derived EST libraries from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 22, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, D. I., & Lombard, P. B. (1993). Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality—a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 44, 409–430.Google Scholar
  12. Kloepper, J. E., Rodriguez-Ubana, R., Zehnder, G. W., Murphy, J. F., Sikora, E., & Fernandez, C. (1999). Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology, 28, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knudsen, I. M. B., Larsen, K. M., Jensen, D. F., & Hockenhull, J. (2002). Potential suppressiveness of different field soils to Pythium damping-off of sugar beat. Applied Soil Ecology, 21, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kupper, T., & Fuchs, J. G. (2007). Kompost und Gärgut in der Schweiz. Berne: Bundesamt für Umwelt.Google Scholar
  15. Li, H.-Y., Yang, G.-D., Shu, H.-R., Yang, Y.-T., Ye, B.-X., Nishida, I., et al. (2006). Colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme induces a defense response against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in the grapevine (Vitis amurensis Rupr.), which includes transcriptional activation of the class III chitinase gene VCH3. Plant and Cell Physiology, 47, 154–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Litterick, A. M., Harrier, L., Wallace, C., Watson, C. A., & Wood, M. (2004). The role of uncomposted materials, composts, manures, and compost extracts in reducing pest and disease incidence and severity in sustainable temperate agricultural and horticultural crop production—a review. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23, 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menzies, J. G. (1959). Occurrence and transfer of a biological factor in soil that suppresses potato scab. Phytopathology, 49, 648–652.Google Scholar
  18. Morlat, R., & Bodin, F. (2006). Characterization of viticultural terroirs using a simple field model based on soil depth—II. Validation of the grape yield and berry quality in the Anjou vineyard (France). Plant and Soil, 281, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seguin, G. (1986). ‘Terroirs’ and pedology of wine growing. Experientia, 42, 861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shipton, P. J., Cook, R. J., & Sitton, J. W. (1973). Occurrence and transfer of a biological factor in soil that suppresses take-all of wheat in Eastern Washington. Phytopathology, 63, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stutz, E. W., Défago, G., & Kern, H. (1986). Naturally occurring fluorescent Pseudomonads involved in suppression of black root rot of tobacco. Phytopathology, 76, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tabatabai, M. A. (1982). Soil Enzymes. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2 chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 903–947). Madison: American Society of Agronomy & Soil Science Society of America 9.Google Scholar
  23. Tamm, L., Thuerig, B., Bruns, C., Fuchs, J. G., Köpke, U., Laustela, M., et al. (2010). Soil type, management history, and soil amendments influence the development of soil-borne (Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium ultimum) and air-borne (Phytophthora infestans, Hyaloperonospora parasitica) diseases. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 127, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. This, P., Jung, A., Boccacci, P., Borrego, J., Botta, R., Costantini, L., et al. (2004). Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109, 1448–1458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Thuerig, B., Fliessbach, A., Berger, N., Fuchs, J., Kraus, N., Mahlberg, N., et al. (2009). Re-establishment of suppressiveness to soil- and air-borne diseases by re-inoculation of soil microbial communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, 2153–2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ton, J., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2004). β-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. The Plant Journal, 38, 119–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vallad, G. E., Cooperband, L., & Goodman, R. M. (2003). Plant foliar disease suppression mediated by composted forms of paper mill residuals exhibits molecular features of induced resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 63, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vallad, G. E., & Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 44, 1920–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998). Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36, 453–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vouillamoz, J. F., Arnold, C., & Frei, A. (2009). Swiss vitis microsatellite database (SVMD). In E. Peterlunger, G. Di Gaspero, & G. Cipriani (Eds.), Proceedings of the IXth International conference on grape genetics and breeding (pp. 477–480). Udine: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 827.Google Scholar
  31. Weller, D. M., Raaijmakers, J. M., Mcspadden Gardener, B. B., & Thomashow, L. S. (2002). Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 40, 309–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiseman, B. M., Neate, S. M., Keller, K. O., & Smith, S. E. (1996). Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 8 in Australia and its biological nature. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 727–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Thuerig
    • 1
  • Ana Slaughter
    • 2
  • Elaheh Marouf
    • 2
  • Matthias Held
    • 2
  • Brigitte Mauch-Mani
    • 2
  • Lucius Tamm
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of Organic AgricultureFrickSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of Neuchâtel, Institute of BiologyNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations