Skip to main content

Identification of resistance to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) disease on apricot genotypes grown in Turkey

Abstract

Bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syrinage (Pss) in apricot has widely spread in Turkey, especially in Malatya province, in recent years. The main objective of this study was to determine resistance of apricot cultivars to bacterial canker caused by Pss in apricot cultivars grown in Turkey. During the 2006–2007 growing period, bacterial isolations were taken from diseased apricot trees in Malatya and 53 Pseudomonas syringae isolates were obtained. Forty-two isolates were determined as Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and 11 isolates as pv. morsprunorum. In a pathogenicity test, leaves of cv. Hacihaliloğlu were used and five Pss isolates (K24, K25, K43, K47 and K51) were detected to be the most virulent and were used to test for cultivar resistance to Pss. Leaves of fifteen apricot cultivars (Alyanak, Çataloğlu, Çöloğlu, Erken Ağerik, Hacihaliloğlu, Hasanbey, İsmailağa, Kabaaşi, Karacabey, Sakit 2, Soğanci, Şam, Şekerpare, Tokaloğlu (Erzincan) and Turfanda Eski Malatya) were tested for resistance to Pss. Green shoots were spray-inoculated with a concentration of 108 cfu ml−1 Pss mixed culture. Sprayed shoots were covered with moist plastic bags for 3 days and maintained in the growth chamber and monitored for symptom development. Hasanbey, Çöloğlu, Soğanci and Şekerpare apricot cultivars were resistant and Şam, Tokaloğlu (Erzincan) and Erken Ağerik apricot cultivars were susceptible to Pss. This is the first report of a resistance source in apricot cultivars grown in Turkey against Pss.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Ala, A. (2004). Kuzey Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yetiştirilen sert çekirdekli meyve ağaçlarinda hastalik oluşturan bakteriyel patojenlerin tanisi. Atatürk Üniv., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. M.Sc. Thesis, s126.

  • Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology. California: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, D. (1999). Apricot culture: present and future. Acta Horticulturae, 488, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosse, J. E., & Garrett, C. M. E. (1966). Bacterial canker of stone fruits. VII. Infection experiments with Pseudomonas morsprunorum and P. s. syringae. Annals of Applied Biology, 58, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2009). Statistical database. www.fao.org.

  • Foulkes, J. A., & Lloyd, A. B. (1980). Epiphytic populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and P. syringae pv. morsprunorum on cherry leaves. Australasian Plant Pathology, 9, 114–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Kashyap, A. S. (1991). Evaluation of apricot and almond fruit germplasm against bacterial gummosis under cold desert conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Agricultural Science Digest (Karnal), 11, 230–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpour, B. (1993). Resistant cultivars of apricot to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) in Mashhad. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, 18, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindal, K. K., & Rana, H. S. (1992). Studies on germplasm resistance and chemical control of bacterial canker of apricot. Plant Disease Research, 7, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. L. (1971). Bacterial canker of sweet cherry in Michigan. Plant Disease Reporter, 55, 961–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavak, H. & Çitir, A. (1995). Malatya ili merkez ilçede kayisilarda görülen hastaliklarin tanilari ve yayginlik oranlari üzerine araştırmalar. (VII. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Bildirileri, Adana). Ekim.

  • Kennelly, M. M., Cazorla, F. M., de Vincente, A., Ramos, C., & Sundin, G. W. (2007). Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees, progress toward understanding and control. Plant Disease, 91, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. O., Ward, M. K., & Raney, D. E. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescence. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 44, 301–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klement, Z., Farkas, G. L., & Lourekovich, L. (1966). Hypersensitive reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria in tobacco leaf. Phytopathology, 54, 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klement, Z., Rudolph, K., & Sands, D. C. (eds). (1990). Methods in phytobacteriology. Budapest: Akademiai Kıado. p568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotan, R., & Sahin, F. (2002). First record of bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, on apricot trees in Turkey. Plant Pathology, 51, 798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latorre, B. A., & Jones, A. L. (1979). Pseudomonas morsprunorum, the cause of bacterial canker of sour cherry in Michigan, and its epiphytic association with P syringae. Phytopathology, 69, 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne, R. E. C. (1978). Harcot apricot. HortScience, 13, 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, R. E. C. (1979). Harogem apricot. HortScience, 14, 759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, R. E. C. (1981a). Hargrand apricot. HortScience, 16, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, R. E. C. (1981b). Harlayne apricot. HortScience, 19, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, R. A., & Stead, D. E. (1987). Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants. London: Blacwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luisetti, J., Prunier, J. P., & Gardan, L. (1972). A medium for the proof of the production of a fluorescent pigment by Pseudomonas morsprunorum f.sp. persicae. Annales de Phytopathologie, 4(3), 295–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanasamy, P. (1997). Plant pathogen detection and disease diagnosis. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, J. M., Zehr, E. I., Bird, G. W., Ritchie, D. F., Uriu, K., & Uyemoto, J. K. (1995). Compendium of stone fruit disease. Minnesota: APS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, V., & Bhardwaj, L. N. (2004). Stone fruit diseases and their management. In S. A. M. H. Naqvi (Ed.), Diseases of fruits and vegetables. Diagnosis and management (Vol. II, pp. 484–510). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, M. (1990). Identification of bacteria through fatty acid analysis. In Z. Klement, K. Rudolph & D. Sands (Eds.), In methods in phytobacteriology (pp. 199–204). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W. (1994). Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. Minnesota: APS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, H. J., Canfield, M. L., Pscheidt, J. W., & Moore, L. W. (1997). Rapid evaluation of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae with a lilac tissue culture bioassay and syringomycin DNA probes. Plant Disease, 81, 905–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scortichini, M., & Morone, C. (1997). Bacterial blister bark of apple trees in Italy. Journal of Phytopathology, 145, 401–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scortichini, M., Pellegrino, S., & Berra, L. (1999). Susceptibility of apricot germplasm to natural infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Piedmont. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura, 61, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. V., Mir, M. S., & Wani, M. A. (2005). Effect of host genotypes and age of plant on resistance to gummosis disease in apricot of Kargil. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 13, 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimalajeewa, D. L. S., & Flett, J. D. (1985). A study of populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on stonefruits in Victoria. Plant Pathology, 34, 248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. M. (1988). Pseudomonas syringae pv. persicae from nectarine, peach and Japanese plum in New Zealand. Bulletin OEPP, 18, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Esitken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donmez, M.F., Karlidag, H. & Esitken, A. Identification of resistance to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) disease on apricot genotypes grown in Turkey. Eur J Plant Pathol 126, 241–247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9536-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9536-x

Keywords

  • Prunus armeniaca
  • Bacterial canker
  • Isolation
  • Identification
  • Cultivar response
  • Resistance