Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of Pseudomonas syringae Strains Associated with a Leaf Disease of Leek in Australia

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A necrotic leaf disease of leek (Allium ampeloprasum Porrum Group) is reported in Australia for the first time. The fluorescent pseudomonad consistently associated with diseased tissue was identified as Pseudomonas syringae by LOPAT tests (+,−,−,−,+), carbon utilisation, bean and lemon inoculations and fatty acid methyl ester analysis. It was confirmed as P. syringae pv. porri by pathogenicity to leeks, bulb onions, spring onions, shallots and garlic, and by genetic analysis using 16S rDNA PCR, REP, ERIC and BOX PCR, and IS50 PCR. Comparison with reference strains of pv. porri from other countries showed similarity to known strains of pv. porri. The Australian leek strains were generally uniform in their biochemical reactions although three strains tested varied in their pathogenicity to other Allium spp. and varied from published data. All Australian strains shared the same genetic profile with strains from New Zealand, France and California. However, Japanese strains from leek and onion were distinct from the Australian strains and those from New Zealand, France and California. Data strongly support the hypothesis that the pathogen is seed-borne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fahy PC, Hayward AC (1983) Media and methods for isolation and diagnostic tests. In PC Fahy GJ Persley (eds.), Plant Bacterial Diseases: A Diagnostic Guide. Academic Press, Sydney pp 337–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardan L, Shafik H, Belouin S, Broch R, Grimont F, Grimont PAD (1999) DNA relatedness among pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and description of Pseudomonas tremae sp. Nov. and Pseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (ex Sutic and Dowson 1959) International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 49: 469–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goto M (1972) Bacterial leaf blight of onion in Japan Plant Disease Reporter 56: 490–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale CN (1975) Bacteriosis of leeks in New Zealand New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18: 251–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward AC (1960) A method for characterising Pseudomonas solanacearum Nature 186: 405–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 44: 301–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koeuth T, Versalovic J, Lupski J (1995). Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumonia BOX elements in diverse bacteria Genome Research 5: 408–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koike ST, Barak JD, Henderson DM, Gilbertson RL (1999) Bacterial blight of leek: a new disease in California caused by Pseudomonas syringae Plant Disease 83: 165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott RA (1952) A new bacterial disease of leeks Plant Pathology 1: 84–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott RA, Billing E, Hayward AC (1966) A determinative scheme for the fluorescent plant pathogenic pseudomonads Journal of Applied Bacteriology 29: 470–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochiai H, Kaku H (1991). Genetic Relationships among Xanthomonas species and Pathovars Based on RFLP Analyses of PCR-amplified 16S, 23S rDNA and rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Annals Phytopathological Society Japan 65: 437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakar SF, Guttman DS (2004) Evolution of the core genome of Pseudomonas syringae, a highly clonal, endemic plant pathogen Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:1999–2012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samson R, Poutier F, Rat B (1981) La graisse bactérienne a Pseudomonas syringae P.H.M. Revue Horticole 219: 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson R, Benjama A (1984) Physiological and serological identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. porri pathogenic to Allium porrum in Proceedings of the Working Group on Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. The Hellenic Phytopathological Society, Athens, Greece pp 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson R, Shafik H, Benjama A, Gardan L (1998) Description of the bacterium causing blight of leek as Pseudomonas syringae pv. porri (pv. nov.) Phytopathology 88: 844–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (eds.) (2001) Laboratory guide to identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. 3rd edn. APS Press, MN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich M, Bereswill S, Volksch B, Fritsche W, Geider K (1993). Molecular characterization of field isolates of Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea differing in coronatine production Journal of General Microbiology 139: 1927–1937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR (1991) Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes Nucleic Acids Research 19: 6823–6831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young JM, Triggs CM (1994) Evaluation of determinative tests for pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae van Hall 1902 Journal of Applied Bacteriology 77: 195–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A portion of this work was funded by the Vegetable Industry and the Australian Government through Horticulture Australia Limited. We thank the Australian growers who participated in the initial disease survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Cother.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noble, D., Cother, E., Hailstones, D. et al. Characterisation of Pseudomonas syringae Strains Associated with a Leaf Disease of Leek in Australia. Eur J Plant Pathol 115, 419–430 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9033-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9033-4

Keywords

Navigation