Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Psychophysics in Phytopathology: The Weber–Fechner Law Revisited

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of disease severity assessment data might be improved if there was a better understanding of how the laws of psychophysics actually relate to the theory and practice of phytopathometry. In this regard, we utilized a classical method developed in the field of psychophysics (the method of comparison stimuli) to test Horsfall and Barratt’s claim that raters cannot accurately discriminate disease severity levels between 25% and 50% because, according to the Weber–Fechner law, visual acuity is proportional to the logarithm of the intensity of the stimulus. We show for two pathosystems, wheat leaf rust and grapevine downy mildew, that raters can accurately discriminate disease severity levels between 25% and 50%, and that although Weber’s law appears to hold true, Fechner’s law does not. Furthermore, based upon our results, the relationship between actual (true) disease severity (X) and disease severity estimated by raters (Y) is linear, not logarithmic as proposed by Horsfall and Barratt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amanat P (1977) Modellversuche zur Ermittlung individueller und objektabhängiger Schätzfehler bei Planzenkrankheiten. Dissertation, University of Giessen, Germany

  • JC Baird E Noma (1978) Fundamentals of Scaling and Psychophysics John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • KS Bordens RB Abbott (1996) Research Design and Methods – A Process Approach Mayfield Publishing Company Mountain View, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • CL Campbell LV Madden (1990) Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology John Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • RF DeVellis (1991) Scale development. Applied Social Research Methods Series NumberInSeriesVol. 26 Sage Publications Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Breitkopf and Harterl. HE Adler, DH Howes, and EG Boring (Trans.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

  • GA Forbes MJ Jeger (1987) ArticleTitleFactors affecting the estimation of disease intensity in simulated plant structures Zeitschrift fur Pflanzen Krankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 94 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • RE Gaunt (1995) ArticleTitleNew philosophies and technologies in disease measurement and appraisal Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • EB Goldstein (1989) Sensation and perception EditionNumber3 Wadsworth Publishing Co Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • AMA Gomes SJ Michereff RLR Mariano (2004) ArticleTitleDevelopment and validation of a diagrammatic key for Cercospora leaf spot of lettuce Summa Phytopathologica 30 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • J Guan FW Nutter SuffixJr. (2003) ArticleTitleQuantifying the intra-rater repeatability and inter-rater reliability of visual disease and remote sensing assessment methods in the alfalfa foliar disease pathosystem Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 25 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • J Guan FW Nutter SuffixJr. (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of single-point alfalfa yield models based on visual disease intensity and remote sensing assessments Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 26 314–324

    Google Scholar 

  • TT Herbert (1982) ArticleTitleThe rationale for the Horsfall–Barratt plan disease assessment scale Phytopathology 72 1269

    Google Scholar 

  • JG Horsfall RW Barratt (1945) ArticleTitleAn improved grading system for measuring plant disease Phytopathology 35 655

    Google Scholar 

  • JG Horsfall EB Cowling (1978) Pathometry: The measurement of plant disease JG Horsfall EB Cowling (Eds) Plant Disease: An Advanced Treatise NumberInSeriesVol. 2 Academic Press New York 120–136

    Google Scholar 

  • J Kranz (1988) Measuring plant disease J Kranz J Rotem (Eds) Experimental Techniques in Plant Disease Epidemiology Springer-Verlag New York 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • M Nita MA Ellis LV Madden (2003) ArticleTitleReliability and accuracy of visual estimation of Phomopsis leaf blight of strawberry Plant Disease 93 995–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. (1997) Disease severity assessment training L Francl D Neher (Eds) Exercises in Plant Disease Epidemiology APS Press St. Paul, MN 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. (2001) Disease assessment terms and concepts OC Maloy TD Murray (Eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology John Wiley and Sons, Inc NY 312–323

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. PD Esker (2001) Disease assessment keys OC Maloy TD Murray (Eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology John Wiley and Sons, Inc NY 323–326

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. PD Esker J Guan C Conover (2001) ArticleTitleA computer program to quantify the “just noticeable difference” when assessing disease severity Phytopathology 91 S179

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter Jr. FW, Esker PD and Coelho Netto RA Disease assessment concepts and the advancements made in improving the accuracy and precision of plant disease data. European Journal of Plant Pathology (in press)

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. RE Gaunt (1996) Recent developments in methods for assessing disease losses in forage/pasture crop S Chakraborty DT Leath RA Skipp GA Pederson RA Bray GCM Latch FW Nutter SuffixJr. (Eds) Pasture and Forage Crop Pathology. American Society of Agronomy Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI 93–118

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr ML Gleason JH Jenco NC Christians (1993) ArticleTitleAssessing the accuracy, intra-rater repeatability and inter-rater reliability of disease assessment systems Phytopathology 83 806–812

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. J Guan (2001) Disease losses OC Maloy TD Murray (Eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology John Wiley and Sons, Inc NY 340–351

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. RH Littrell (1996) ArticleTitleRelationships among percent defoliation, canopy reflectance, and pod yield in the peanut-late leafspot system Crop Protection 15 135–142 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0261-2194(95)00084-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. D Litwiller (1998) ArticleTitleA computer program to generate standard area diagrams to aid raters in assessing disease severity Phytopathology 88 S117

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. SK Parker (1997) Fitting disease progress curves using EPIMODEL L Francl D Neher (Eds) Exercises in Plant Disease Epidemiology APS Press St. Paul, MN 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. PM Schultz (1995) ArticleTitleImproving the accuracy and precision of disease assessment: Selection of methods and use of computer-aided training programs Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17 174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • FW Nutter SuffixJr. O Worawitlikit (1990) ArticleTitleDisease Pro: A computerized disease assessment training program Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Ed. Society 22 38

    Google Scholar 

  • RD O’Brien AHC Bruggen Particlevan (1992) ArticleTitleAccuracy, precision, and correlation to yield loss of disease severity scales for corky root of lettuce Phytopathology 82 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman CE, King EP and Brown Jr. IF (1969) Tables for Conversion of Barratt–Horsfall Rating Scores to Estimated Mean Percentages. Elanco Products Co., Indianapolis, Indiana. Mimeo, unnumbered

  • RT Sherwood CC Berg MR Hoover KE Zeiders (1983) ArticleTitleIllusions in visual assessment of Stagonospora leaf spot of orchardgrass Phytopathology 73 173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • SS Stevens (1936) ArticleTitleA scale for measurement of a psychological magnitude loudness Psychological Review 43 405–416

    Google Scholar 

  • SS Stevens (1957) ArticleTitleOn the psychophysical law Psychological Review 64 153–181 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CyiD1cflslM%3D Occurrence Handle13441853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SS Stevens (1961) ArticleTitleTo honor Fechner and repeal his law Science 133 80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • P Subrahmanyam D McDonald RW Gibbons SN Nigam DJ Nevill (1982) ArticleTitleResistance to rust and late leafspot diseases in some genotypes of Arachis hypogaea Peanut Science 9 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EH (1834) De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu: Annotationes, anatomical et physiological. Koehler, Leipzig

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, 351 Bessey Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Forrest W. Nutter Jr & Paul D. Esker

Authors
  1. Forrest W. Nutter Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul D. Esker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Forrest W. Nutter Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nutter, F.W., Esker, P.D. The Role of Psychophysics in Phytopathology: The Weber–Fechner Law Revisited. Eur J Plant Pathol 114, 199–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-4732-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-4732-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation