Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2012). The impact of jury race in criminal trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, First published on-line.
Bafumi, J., Gelman, A., Park, D. K., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Practical issues in implementing and understanding bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis, 3, 171–197.
Berlemann, M. & Christman, R. (2016). Determinants of in-court settlement: Evidence from a german trial court. Working Paper.
Boyd, C. L., Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2010). Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 389–411.
Brace, P., & Hall, M. G. (1995). Studying courts comparatively: The view from the american states. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 5–29.
Brace, P., Yates, J., & Boyea, B. D. (2012). Judges, litigants, and the design of courts. Law & Society Review, 46(3), 497–522.
Brace, P. R., & Hall, M. G. (1997). The interplay of preferences, case facts, context, and rules in the politics of judicial choice. The Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1206–1231.
Clermont, K. & Eisenberg, T. (2002). Plaintiphobia in the appellate courts: Civil rights really do differ from negotiable instruments? University of Illinois Law Review.
Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2016). Law and Economics (6th ed.). Berkeley: Berkeley Law Books.
Daughety, A. F., & Reinganum, J. F. (2012). Settlement. In: Procedural Law and Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
De Maillard Taillefer, L. & Timbart, O. (2009). Les affaires prud’homales en 2007. Technical Report 105, Infostat, Ministère de la Justice.
Desrieux, C., & Espinosa, R. (2017). Enjeux et perspective de l’analyse économique des conseils de prud’hommes. Revue française d’économie, 1, 137–168.
Eisenberg, T. (1991). The relationship between plaintiff success rates before trial and at trial. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 154(1), 111–116.
Eisenberg, T. (1994). Negotiation, lawyering, and adjudication: Kritzer on brokers and deals. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(1), 275–299.
Eisenberg, T. & Farber, H. S. (1997). The litigious plaintiff hypothesis: Case selection and resolution. Rand Journal of Economics, 28.
Eisenberg, T., & Lanvers, C. (2009). What is the settlemen rate and why should we care? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6, 111–146.
Epstein, L., & Kobylka, J. (1994). The Supreme Court and legal change: Abortion and the death penalty. University of North Carolina Press.
Epstein, L., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2013). The Behavior of Federal Judges: A theoretical and empirical study of rational choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Epstein, L., & Lindquist, S. (2016). The Oxford handbook of U.S. judicial behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Espinosa, R. (2017). Constitutional Judicial Behavior: Exploring the Determinants of the Decisions of the French Constitutional Council. Review of Law and Economics, 13(2).
Espinosa, R., Desrieux, C., & Ferracci, M. (2017a). Labor Market and Access to Justice. International Review of Law and Economics (first on-line publication).
Espinosa, R., Desrieux, C., & Wan, H. (2017b). Fewer Courts, less justice? Evidence from the 2008 French Reform of labour Courts. European Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 195–237.
Farhang, S., & Wawro, G. (2004). Institutional dynamics on the u.s. court of appeals: Minority representation under panel decision making. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20(2), 299–330.
Fraisse, H., Kramarz, F., & Prost, C. (2014). Labor disputes and labor flows. Industrial Labor Relations Review, forthcoming.
Garoupa, N., Gomez-Pomer, F., & Grembi, V. (2011). Judging under political pressure: An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the spanish constitutional court. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29(3), 513–534.
Glynn, A. N., & Sen, M. (2015). Identifying judicial empathy: Does having daughters cause judges to rule for women’s issues? American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 37–54.
Gross, S., & Syveryd, K. (1991). Getting to no: A study of settlement negotiations and the selection of cases for trial. Michigan Law Review, 90, 319–393.
Guillonneau, M., & Serverin, E. (2015). Les litiges individuels du travail de 2004 à 2013: des actions moins nombreuses mais toujours plus contentieuses. Technical Report 135, Infostat, Ministère de la Justice.
Hall, M. G. (1987). Constituent influence in state supreme courts: Conceptual notes and a case study. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 1117–1124.
Hall, M. G. (1992). Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 427–446.
Hay, B., & Spier, K. (1998). Settlement of Litigation. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, number 442. MacMillan Reference Limited.
Hitt, M. P. (2013). Presidential success in supreme court appointments: Informational effects and institutional constraints. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(4), 792–813.
Huang, K. (2008). How legal representation affects case outcomes: An empirical perspective from taiwan. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5, 197–238.
Huang, K.-C., Chen, K.-P., & Lin, C.-C. (2010). An empirical investigation of settlement and litigation: The case of taiwanese labor disputes. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(4), 786–810.
Ichino, A., Polo, M., & Rettore, E. (2003). Are judges biased by labor market conditions? European Economic Review, 47(5), 913–944.
Kaplan, D., Sadka, J., & Silva-Mendez, J. L. (2008). Litigation and settlement: New evidence from labor courts in mexico. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(2), 309–350.
Kessler, D., Meites, T., & Miller, G. P. (1996). Explaining deviations from the fifty-percent rule: A Multimodal approach to the selection of cases for litigation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 233–59.
Klerman, D. (2012). The selection of 13th-century disputes for litigation. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(2), 320–346.
Kulik, C., Perry, E. L., & Pepper, M. B. (2003). Here comes the judge: The influence of judge personal characteristics on federal sexual harassment case outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 27(1), 69–86.
Lederman, L. (1999). Which cases go to trial: An empirical analysis of predictors of failure to settle. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 49(2), 315–358.
Lim, C. S. (2013). Preferences and incentives of appointed and elected public officials. American Economic Review, 103, 1360–1397.
Loewenstein, G., C., I. S. C., & Babcock, L. (1993). Self-serving assessments of fairness and pretrial bargaining. The Journal of Legal Studies, 22(1), 135–159.
Marinescu, I. (2011). Are judges sensitive to economic conditions? Evidence from uk employment tribunals. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(4), 673–698.
Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via markov chain monte carlo for the u.s. supreme court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis, 10, 134–153.
Martin, A. D., Quinn, K. M., & Epstein, L. (2005). The median justice on the united states supreme court. North Carolina Law Review, 5, 1275–1320.
Peresie, J. (2005). Female judges matter: Gender and collegial decision making in the federal appellate courts. The Yale Law Journal, 114(7), 1759–1790.
Perry, H. (1994). Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Priest, G. L., & Klein, B. (1984). The selection of disputes for litigation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 1–55.
Pérez-Liñán, A., Ames, B., & Seligson, M. A. (2006). Strategy, careers, and judicial decisions: Lessons from the bolivian courts. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 284–295.
Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (1993). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (1996). The influence of stare decisis on the votes of united states supreme court justices. American Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 971–1003.
Serverin, E., & Valentin, J. (2009). Licenciement et recours aux prud’hommes, questions de mesure. In B. Gomel, D. Méda, & E. Serverin (Eds.), L’emploi en ruptures. Paris: Dalloz.
Shayo, M., & Zussman, A. (2011). Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1447–1484.
Songer, D. R., & Lindquist, S. A. (1996). Not the whole story: The impact of justices’ values on supreme court decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 1049–1063.
Waldfogel, J. (1995). The selection hypothesis and the relationship between trial and plaintiff victory. Journal of Political Economy, 103(2), 229–60.