Advertisement

European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 423–451 | Cite as

Posting of workers across the EU: an empirical investigation

Article
  • 340 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of the intra-European posting of workers on domestic labour markets in the years 2007–2009. Instrumental variables related to neighbouring countries’ populations are used to address the endogeneity between posting and labour market features. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that an intensification of posting inflows is not likely to displace domestic workers, at any educational levels. Instead, an increase in posting from abroad may raise domestic labour costs. No significant effects are found on sending country labour market variables. Results point towards the development of possible synergies between domestic and posted workers, so that posting can actually improve labour efficiency and put upward pressure on labour costs.

Keywords

Posting of Workers Directive Employment Displacement Wage Labour cost Productivity 

JEL Classification

F2 J8 K31 K33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme and by “Paolo Baffi” Center, Università Bocconi. We are grateful to the Editor, Giovanni Ramello, two anonymous referees, Filippo Belloc, Paolo Mariani, Ismeri Europa, participants at the ISLE-Conference (Torino, 2011) and at seminars at the Department of Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Altonji, J. G., & Card, D. (1991). The effects of immigration on the labor market outcomes of less-skilled natives. In J. M. Abowd & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration, trade, and the labour market (pp. 201–234). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (1999). Empirical strategies in labor economics. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), The handbook of labor economics (Vol. III). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, M., & Wörgötter, A. (2009). Structural reforms and the benefits of the enlarged EU internal market: Still much to be gained. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 694.Google Scholar
  4. Babecký, J., & Dybczak, K. (2012). Real wage flexibility in the European Union: New evidence from the labour cost data. Praha: Czech National Bank, Research Department.Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, C. (2000). Social dumping and the race to the bottom: Some lessons for European union from Delaware? European Law Review, 25, 57–78.Google Scholar
  6. Barnard, C. (2009a). The UK and posted workers: The effect of commission v Luxembourg on the territorial application of British Labor Law. Industrial Law Journal, 38, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnard, C. (2009b). British jobs for British workers: The Lindsey Oil Refinery Dispute and the Future of Local Labor Clauses in an Integrated EU Market. Industrial Law Journal, 38, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertola, G., & Mola, L. (2010). Services provision and temporary mobility: Freedoms and regulation in the EU. The World Economy, 33, 633–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borjas, G. J. (2003). The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Re-examining the impact of immigration on the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1335–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucker, A., & Wiebke, W. (2010). Viking–Laval–Rüffert: Consequences and policy perspectives. ETUI Report No. 111, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 22–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cremers, J. (2010). In search of cheap labor in Europe. CLR European Institute for Construction Labor Research.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, P. (2002). The posted workers directive and the EC Treaty. Industrial Law Journal, 31, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Bruijna, R., Kox, H., & Lejoura, A. (2008). Economic benefits of an Integrated European Market for Services. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebenstein, A., Harrison, A., McMillan, M., & Phillips, S. (2014). Estimating the impact of trade and offshoring on American workers using the current population surveys. Review of Economics, 96, 581–595.Google Scholar
  16. El Khoury, A., & Savvides, A. (2006). Openness in services trade and economic growth. Economic Letters, 92, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ETUC. (2010). The posting of workers directive: Proposals for revision. Resolution adopted at the ETUC Executive Committee on 9–10 March 2010.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2008). Industrial relation in Europe 2008. http://ec.europa.eu.
  19. European Commission. (2010). Administrative data collection on E101 certificates issued in 2007.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2011). Posting of workers in the European Union and EFTA countries: Report on E101 certificates issued in 2008 and 2009. http://ec.europa.eu.
  21. European Commission. (2014). Posting of workers: EU safeguards against social dumping. http://ec.europa.eu.
  22. Feenstra, R. C., & Gordon, H. H. (1999). The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the U.S., 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 907–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedberg, R. M., & Hunt, J. (1995). The Impact of immigrants on host country wages, employment and growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giese, R. (2003). Posting: Social protection of workers vs. fundamental freedoms? Common Market Law Review, 40, 143–158.Google Scholar
  25. Harrison, A. E., McLaren, J., & McMillan, M. (2011). Recent perspectives on trade and inequality. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hummels, D., Jorgensen, R., Munch, J., & Xiang, C. (2010). The wage and employment effects of outsourcing: Evidence from Danish matched worker-firm data. Working Paper, July.Google Scholar
  27. Idea Consult. (2011). Study on the economic and social effects associated with the phenomenon of posting of workers in the EU. Report on behalf of the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu.
  28. Ismeri Europa. (2012). Preparatory study for an Impact Assessment concerning the possible revision of the legislative framework on the posting of workers in the context of the provision of services. Report on behalf of the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu.
  29. Kerr, S. P., & Kerr W. R. (2011). Economic impacts of immigration: A survey. NBER WP no. 16736.Google Scholar
  30. Kolehmainen, E. (1999). The directive concerning the posting of workers: Synchronization of the functions of national legal systems. Comparative Labor Law and Labor Policy Journal, 89, 71–104.Google Scholar
  31. Kvist, J. (2004). Does EU enlargement start a race to the bottom? Strategic interaction among EU member states in social policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 14, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, R., & Treáer, D. (2008). Much Ado about nothing: American jobs and the rise of service outsourcing to China and India. NBER Working Paper No. 14061 (June).Google Scholar
  33. Longhi, S., Nijkam, P., & Poote, J. (2006). The impact of immigration on the employment of natives in regional labour markets: A meta-analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2044.Google Scholar
  34. Menz, G. (2005). Varieties of capitalism and Europeanization: National response strategies to the single European market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Monti, M. (2010). A new strategy for the single market—At the service of the Europe’s economy and society. Report to the President of the European Commission.Google Scholar
  36. Pallini, M., & Pedersini, R. (2010). Posted workers in the European Union. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  37. van Hoek, A., & Houwerzij, M. (2011). Comparative study on the legal aspects of the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services in the European Union. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu.
  38. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DEMS, University of Milano-Bicocca and “Paolo Baffi” CenterUniversità BocconiMilanItaly
  2. 2.DEMS, University of Milano-Bicocca and Amsterdam Center for Law and EconomicsUniversity of AmsterdamMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations