European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 209–223 | Cite as

Laws and stigma: the case of prostitution

Article

Abstract

We study the opinions on prostitution that emerged from the World Value Survey. We show that individuals tends to justify prostitution more in countries where it is legal or regulated and less in countries where it is prohibited, even after controlling for religious, cultural and sociological factors. To overcome the endogeneity of the policy to the opinions, we propose an instrumental variable strategy, instrumenting prostitution policy with legal origins. At least for the case of prostitution, policies seem to affect opinions.

Keywords

Prostitution Stigma Law Gender 

JEL Classification

O17 K14 J16 

References

  1. Botero, J. C., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Della Giusta, M., Di Tommaso, M. L., & Strøm, S. (2008). Sex markets: A denied industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Della Giusta, M., Di Tommaso, M. L., & Strøm, S. (2009). Who is watching? The market for prostitution services. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., Nenova, T., & Shleifer, A. (2003a). Who owns the media? Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 341–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Legal origins. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1193–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Immordino, G., & Russo, F. (forthcoming). Optimal prostitution policy. In Handbook of the economics of prostitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Immordino, G., & Russo, F. (2015). Regulating prostitution: An health risk approach. Journal of Public Economics, 121, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2011). Gender equity and prostitution: An investigation of attitudes in Norway and Sweden. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kotsadam, A., & Jakobsson, N. (2014). Shame on you, John! Laws, stigmatization, and the demand for sex. European Journal of Law and Economics, 37(3), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kotsadam, A., & Jakobsson, N. (2011). Do laws affect attitudes? An assessment of the Norwegian prostitution law using longitudinal data. International Review of Law and Economics, 31(2), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kousmanen, J. (2010). Attitudes and perceptions about legislation prohibiting the purchase of sexual services in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mulligan, C. B., & Shleifer, A. (2005a). Conscription as regulation. American Law and Economics Review, 7(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mulligan, C. B., & Shleifer, A. (2005b). The extent of the market and the supply of regulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1445–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Naples Federico II and CSEFNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations