Advertisement

European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 179–182 | Cite as

Barbara Gabor: Regulatory competition in the internal market: comparing models for corporate law, securities law and competition law

  • Lars Hornuf
Book Review
  • 275 Downloads

The virtues and drawbacks of regulatory competition have been subject to a long-standing academic debate. While proponents of regulatory competition have argued that it constitutes a mechanism by which firms and individuals can overcome costly regulation, that in turn was created by captured politicians or corrupt bureaucrats, opponents have claimed that regulatory competition results in a race to the bottom, as a result of which the laxest standards will ultimately prevail. More recently, a convincing welfare analysis was conducted by Sinn (2003), who stated that if a piece of regulation is legitimate in the first place (for instance to overcome a market failure) and then becomes subject to regulatory competition on a higher regulatory level, such competition is detrimental to overall social welfare.

Gabor (2013) set out to investigate regulatory competition by focusing on the internal market. Her book is highly appreciated as to my knowledge no other book exists that summarizes the...

References

  1. Becht, M., Mayer, C., & Wagner, H. F. (2008). Where do firms incorporate? Deregulation and the cost of entry. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BEUC (2010). Country survey of collective redress mechanisms: Where does collective redress for individual damages exist?, http://www.beuc.eu/publications/2011-10006-01-e.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2014.
  3. Braun, R., Eidenmüller, H., Engert, A., & Hornuf, L. (2013). Does charter competition foster entrepreneurship? A difference-in-difference approach to European company law reforms. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3), 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, S. J., Gulati, G. M., & Posner, E. (2011). Pricing terms in sovereign debt contracts: A Greek case study with implications for the European crisis resolution mechanism. Capital Market Law Journal, 6(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eidenmüller, H., Engert, A., & Hornuf, L. (2010). How does the market react to the Societas Europaea? European Business Organization Law Review, 11(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engert, A., & Hornuf, L. (2013). Can network effects impede optimal contracting in debt securities? Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 434, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2155958. Accessed 28 March 2014.
  7. Gabor, B. (2013). Regulatory competition in the internal market: Comparing models for corporate law, securities law and competition law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Linklaters (2011). Collective actions across the globe—A review, www.linklaters.com/pdfs/mkt/london/1103_Collective_actions.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2014.
  9. O’Hara, E., & Ribstein, L. E. (2009). The law market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sinn, H.-W. (2003). The new systems competition: A construction principle for Europe. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stuyck, J. et al. (2007). An analysis and evaluation of alternative means of consumer redress other than redress through ordinary judicial proceedings—Final report, http://www.eurofinas.org/uploads/documents/policies/OTHER%20POLICY%20ISSUES/comparative_report_en.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations