Skip to main content

Shame on you, John! Laws, stigmatization, and the demand for sex

Abstract

The present article contributes to the literature on prostitution by shedding light on the effects of the criminalization of buying sex on the amount of prostitution bought, as well as on the proposed theoretical mechanisms underlying this change. We find indications that criminalizing the buying of sex may decrease the quantity of sex bought. While we find that stigma influences the demand for sex, we do not find that stigma increases as a result of the law. Therefore, the possible reduced quantity of sex bought is probably due to the more direct risk of getting caught.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. For more information on the data, see Jakobsson and Kotsadam (2010, 2011), and Kotsadam and Jakobsson (2011).

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1980). A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 749–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, R., Gomez, F., Gutierrez Franco, Y. (2007). Regulating Prostitution: A comparative law and economics approach. FEDEA Working papers 30.

  • Arunachalam, R., & Shah, M. (2008). Prostitution and brides? American Economic Review, 98(2), 516–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G., Murphy, K., & Grossman, M. (2006). The market for illegal goods: The case of drugs. Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., & Collins, A. (2003). Estimates of a model of male participation in the market for female heterosexual prostitution services. European Journal of Law and Economics, 16(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., Collins, A., & Thew, N. (1999). Prostitution services: An exploratory empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 31(12), 1523–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S., & Kendall T. D. (2011b). Men in transit and prostitution: using political conventions as a natural experiment. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 11(1), Article 30. doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2735.

  • Cunningham, S., & Kendall, T. D. (2011). Prostitution 2.0: The changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(3), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Giusta, M. (2010). Simulating the impact of regulation changes on the market for prostitution services. European Journal of Law and Economics, 29(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Giusta, M., Di Tommaso, M. L., & Strøm, S. (2008). Sex markets: A denied industry. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Giusta, M., Di Tommaso, M. L., & Strøm, S. (2009). Who is watching? The market for prostitution services. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, L., & Korn, E. (2002). A theory of prostitution. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P., Shah, M., & Bertozzi, S. M. (2005). Risky business: The market for unprotected commercial sex. Journal of Political Economy, 113(3), 518–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R,. Tyson, L. D., Zahidi, S. (2009). The Global Gender Gap Report 2009, World Economic Forum, Geneva. Available online: http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf.

  • Holmström, C., & Skilbrei, M. L. (2008). Nordiska prostitutionsmarknader I förändring: en inledning. In C. Holmström & M. L. Skilbrei (Eds.), Prostitution i Norden: Forskningsrapport (pp. 9–38). Köpenhamn: Nordiska Ministerrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2010). Do attitudes toward gender equality really differ between Norway and Sweden? Journal of European Social Policy, 20(2), 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2011). Gender equity and prostitution: An investigation of attitudes in Norway and Sweden. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson. N., Kotsadam, A. (forthcoming). The law and economics of international sex slavery: Prostitution laws and trafficking for sexual exploitation. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10657-011-9232-0.

  • Kotsadam, A., & Jakobsson, N. (2011). Do laws affect attitudes? An assessment of the Norwegian prostitution law using longitudinal data. International Review of Law and Economics, 31(2), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S. (2006). Flickan som lekte med elden. Stockholm: Norstedts. [English title: The girl who played with fire].

  • Levitt, S. D., Venkatesh S. A. (2007). An empirical analysis of street-level prostitution. Mimeo.

  • Moffat, P. G., & Peters, S. A. (2004). Pricing personal services: An empirical study of earnings in the UK prostitution industry. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(5), 675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Ministry of Justice. (2008). Forbud mot kjøp av sex i Norge og i utlandet. No. 41. Available online: www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/jd/pressesenter/pressemeldinger/2008/forbud-mot-kjop-av-sex-i-norge-og-i-utla.html?id=508300 (accessed August 2011).

  • Rao, V., Gupta, I., Lokshin, M., & Jana, S. (2003). Sex workers and the cost of safe sex: The compensating differential for condom use among Calcutta sex workers. Journal of Development Economics, 71(2), 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P. (2004). Organization of illegal markets: An economic analysis. Miami: University Press of the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilbrei, M. L. (2008). Rettslig håndtering av prostitusjon og menneskehandel i Norge. In C. Holmström & M. L. Skilbrei (Eds.), Prostitution i Norden: Forskningsrapport (pp. 235–253). Köpenhamn: Nordiska ministerrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Kotsadam.

Additional information

The project is also part of the research activities at the ESOP center at the Department of Economics, University of Oslo. ESOP is supported by The Research Council of Norway.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7.

Table 7 Variable description

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotsadam, A., Jakobsson, N. Shame on you, John! Laws, stigmatization, and the demand for sex. Eur J Law Econ 37, 393–404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-012-9339-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-012-9339-y

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Law
  • Norm
  • Prostitution
  • Reputation
  • Sex
  • Stigma

JEL Classification

  • J16
  • J22
  • J23