Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confidential service contract promotes competition in the European shipping market

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In November 2002, the European Commission granted an individual exemption for the revised trans-atlantic conference agreement (TACA) after it held that provisions in the agreement regarding service contracts and multi-carrier service contracts to be outside the scope of the block exemption. The elimination of conference’s role of enforcing tariff rates should improve slot utilization by promoting efficient pricing. This paper develops a backhaul pricing model to investigate the effect of confidential service contracts on the structure of liner market. In view of the increasing gap between head haul and backhaul freight rates in the European Union after year 2002, a linear joint pricing equation is numerically applied to the homebound and outbound freight rate indices at ports of Antwerp/Hamburg. This study finds that these freight rate indices moved in the opposite directions as it was predicted by the Smith’s condition of joint product, and the European liner market has become competitive after November 2002.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, F. W. (1968). The pope and the price of fish. American Economic Review, 58(5), 1346–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, K. D. (1997). Principles of transportation economics. Michigan State University, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

  • Containerisation International. (2003). Growing pains, Oct, p. 41.

  • Davies, J. E. (1984). Freight rate stability in liner shipping: Implicit peak load pricing? International Journal of Transport Economics, 11(2–3), 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. E. (1987). On the nature and sources of controversy in the economic analysis of the liner shipping industry. Maritime Policy and Management, 14(3), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice. (1990). Analysis of the impact of the shipping act of 1984 (DoJ Report 1990). Washington, USA: US DoJ Antitrust Division.

  • Ekelund, R. B., & Thompson, J. (2001). Joint supply and the development of economic theory: A historical perspective. History of Political Economy, 33(3), 577–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005). The application of competition rules to liner shipping: Final report, Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy and Logistics, Berlin University of Technology, pp. 151–152.

  • Europa Press Release Rapid. (2002). Brussels, 14 Nov 2002.

  • Federal Maritime Commission. (1989). Section 18 Report on the Shipping Act of 1984 (p. 8). Washington, USA: FMC.

  • Felton, J. R. (1981). The impact of rate regulation upon ICC-Regulated truck back hauls. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 15(3), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D. C. (1972). Joint products and road transport rates in transport models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 6(1), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkeren, O., Demirel, E., Ommeren, J., & Rietveld, P. (2010). Endogenous transport prices and trade imbalances. Journal of Economic Geography, 1–19. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq002.

  • Kahn, A. E. (1970). The economics of regulation, vol. 1. New York: Wiley.

  • OECD. (1976). The footwear industry: Structure and governmental policies (pp. 119–120). OECD: Paris.

  • Phang, S. Y. (2009). Competition laws and the international transport sectors. The Competitions Law Review, 5(2), 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review of Maritime Transport. (1995-2009). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Secretariat, Geneva.

  • Rietveld, P., & Roson, R. (2002). Direction dependent prices in public transport: A good idea? The back haul pricing problem for a monopolistic public transport firm. Transportation, 29, 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashikumar, N. (1995). Competition and models of market structure in liner shipping. Transport Review, 15(1), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. (1992). The pope and the price of leather. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148, 452–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Jagt, N. (2004). Liner shipping: Ancient myths and modern realities. Consumer Policy Review, 14(2), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, No. 2, Pei-Ning Road, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Dong-Hua Wang

Authors
  1. Dong-Hua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Hua Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, DH. Confidential service contract promotes competition in the European shipping market. Eur J Law Econ 36, 117–129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9240-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9240-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation