Abstract
We examine how foreign ownership influences the extent to which firms engage in outsourcing. We observe a significant and positive relationship between the extent of foreign ownership and the level of internal sourcing for the firms. Second, when foreign owners have at least 51% ownership versus where foreign ownership is less than 51% we observe dramatic differences in outsourcing levels. Also we find that for firms with controlling foreign ownership undertaking in-house activities, the motivation to keep their property rights as inviolate as possible when their capability contributions within the Indian economy are large and significant is intense. For firms considering locating in India a strategy of internalization of activities in India is central towards retaining their competitive advantage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagchi, A. K. (1972). Private investment in India, 1900 to 1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhagwati, J. N. (1993). India in transition: Freeing the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buchinsky, M. (1994). Changes in the U.S. wage structure, 1963–1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica, 62, 405–458.
Chhibber, P. K., & Majumdar, S. K. (1999). Foreign ownership and profitability: Property rights, control and the performance of firms in Indian industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 62(1), 209–238.
Das, G. (2002). India unbound: A personal account of a social and economic revolution. New York: Knopf.
Forbes, N. (2002). Doing business in India: What has liberalization changed? In A. Krueger (Ed.), Economic policy reforms and the Indian economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grief, A. (1992). Institutions and international trade: Lessons from the commercial revolution. American Economic Review, 82(2), 128–133.
Jalan, B. (1991). India’s economic crisis: The way ahead. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Jalan, B. (2005). The future of India: Politics, economics and governance. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.
Kidron, M. (1965). Foreign investments in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33–50.
Koenker, R., & Hallett, K. F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143–156.
Majumdar, S. K., & Sen, K. (2007). The debt wish: Rent seeking by business groups and the structure of corporate borrowing in India. Public Choice, 131(1), 209–223.
Mata, J., & Machado, J. (1996). Firm start-up size: A conditional quantile approach. European Economic Review, 40, 1305–1323.
Milgrom, P., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The Medieval Law Merchant, Private Judges and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics, 2(1), 1–23.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Poirier, D. J. (1976). The econometrics of structural change. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, K., & Vaidya, R. R. (1997). The process of financial liberalization in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majumdar, S.K., Datta, D.K. Foreign ownership and firm scope in India. Eur J Law Econ 27, 39–52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9061-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9061-y
Keywords
- Capabilities
- Emerging markets
- Governance
- Indian industry
- Integration
- Majority ownership
- Ownership structure
- Outsourcing
- Property rights
- Scope of the firm