Abstract
To meet its obligations accepted in the Kyoto Protocol cost effectively, the European Union introduces a scheme of Greenhouse Gas Allowance Trading for its member states. This paper evaluates the cost effectiveness, ecological accuracy and dynamic incentives of this approach.
The EU-emissions trading constitutes an important shift in the paradigm of environmental policy, from command and control to a market based approach. Still, the EU-system does not fully realize the economic potential of the transferable discharge permit policy. Especially, the limited scope of trading regarding geography, pollutants, sectors and activities reduces the quality of the system. Moreover, the EU-Directive is unspecific in many respects and it leaves many decisions defining the rules of the game to the individual member state. Uncertainty and heterogeneity increase transaction cost and thereby hamper the effectiveness of the system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barde, J.-P. (2000). “Environmental Policy and Policy Instruments.” In H. Folmer & H. Gabel (eds.), Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics, Cheltenham, pp. 157–201.
Baumol, W. J. & Oates, W. E. (1971). “The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment.” Swedish Journal of Economics. 73, 42–54.
Boemare, C. & Quirion, Ph. (2002). “Implementing GHG Trading in Europe.” Ecological Economics. 43, 213–230.
Böhringer, Ch., Hoffmann, T., Lange, A., Löschel, A., & Mooslehner, U. (2004). “Assessing Emission Allocation in Europe: An Interactive Simulation Approach.” Discussion Paper No. 04-40, Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
Böhringer, Ch., & Lange, A. (2003). “Efficiency, Compensation, and Discrimination: What is at Stake when Implementing the EU-Emissions Trading Scheme?” Discussion Paper No. 03-73, Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
Bovenberg, A. L. & Goulder, L. H. (1996). “Optimal Environmental Taxation in a Presence of other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analyses.” American Economic Review. 86, 985–1000.
Braun Weiss, E. & Jacobson, H. K. (1997). “Compliance with International Environmental Accords.” In M. Rolen, H. Sjöberg & U. Svedin (eds.), International Governance on Environmental Issues. Dordrecht, pp. 78–110.
Burtraw, D. et al. (2001). The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading. Resource for the Future Discussion Paper 01–30, Washington, D.C.
Burtraw, D. et al. (2002). “The Effect of Asset Values on the Allocation of CO2-Emission Allowances.” The Electricity Journal. 15, 51–62.
Carraro, C. & Lévêque, F. (1999). “Introduction: The Rational and Potential of Voluntary Approaches.” In C. Carraro, F. Lévêque (eds.), Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Dordrecht, pp. 1–16.
Carraro, C. & Siniscalco, D. (1996). “Voluntary Agreements in Environmental Policy.” In A. Xepapadeas (ed.), Economic Policy for the Environment and Natural Resources. Cheltenham, pp. 80–94.
Coase, R. H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics. 3, 1–44.
Commission of the European Communities, Common Position (EC) No. 28/2003 Adopted by the Council on 18 March, 2003 with a View to Adopting Directive 2003/87/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Scheme for the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2003/C125E/05), Brussels 2003a.
Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Directive Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms (SGC) (2003) (785), of 23.7.2003, Brussels, 2003b.
Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament Pursuant to the Second Subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty Concerning the Common Position of the Council on the Adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, Brussels, 2003c.
Crocker, T. D. (1965). “The Structuring of Atmospheric Pollution Control Systems.” In H. Wolozin (ed.), The Economics of Pollution. New York.
Cronshaw, M. B. & Kruse, J. B. (1996). “Regulated Firms in Pollution Permit Markets with Banking.” Journal of Regulatory Economics. 9, 179–189.
Dales, J. H. (1968). “Land, Water and Ownership.” Canadian Journal of Economics. 1, 797–804.
Eckermann, F. Hunt, H. Stronzig, M., & Taylor, T. (2003). “The Role of Transaction Costs and Risk Premia in the Determination of Climate Change Policy Responses.” ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03/59, Mannheim, 2003.
Endres, A. (1999). “Assessing the Different Instruments in Climate Change Mitigation from the Perspective of Economics.” In J. Hacker, A. Pelchen (eds.), Goals and Economic Instruments for the Achievement of Global Warming Mitigation in Europe, Proceedings of the EU-Advance-Study Course. Dordrecht, pp. 409–425.
Endres, A. (2000). Umweltökonomie, Stuttgart.
Faure, M., Gupta, J., & Nentjes, A. (eds.) (2003). Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. Cheltenham.
Faure, M. & Skogh, G. (2003). The Economic Analysis of Environmental Policy and Law. Cheltenham.
Finus, M. (2001) Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation. Cheltenham.
Fisher, C., Parry, I. W. H. et al. (2003). “Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection when Technological Innovation is Endogenous.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 45, 523–545.
Funk, P. (2004). “On the Effective Use of Stigma as a Crime-Deterrent.” European Economic Review. 48, 715–728.
Goodstein, E. (1995) Economics and the Environment Englewood Cliffs.
Goulder, I. H., Parry, I. W. H. & Burtraw, D. (1997). “Revenue Raising Versus other Approaches to Environmental Protection.” RAND Journal of Economics. 28, 708–731.
Goulder, L. H. & Schneider, S. H. (1999). “Induced Technological Change and the Attractiveness of CO2-Abatement Policies.” Resource and Energy Economics. 21, 211–253.
Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F., & White, B. (2001). Introduction to Environmental Economics. Oxford.
Harrington, W. & Morgenstern, R. D. (2004). “Economic Incentives versus Command and Control.” Resources. 152, 13–17.
Harrison, D. (2002). “Tradable Permits for Air Quality and Climate Change.” In T. Tietenberg & H. Folmer (eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2002/2003, Cheltenham, pp. 311–372.
Hidalgo, I. et al. (2004). “Technological Prospects and CO2 Emission Trading Analyses in the Iron and Steel Industry: A Global Model.” In Paper presented at the 13 th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists in Budapest. June 25–28.
Hillebrand, B., Smajgel, A., Ströbele, W., Behringer, J.-M., Heins, B., & Meyer, E.-C. (2002). Zertifikatehandel für CO2-Emissionen auf dem Prüfstand, Münster.
Hoel, M. (1991). “Global Environmental Problems: The Effects of Unilateral Actions Taken by One Country.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 20, 50–70.
Jakeman, G., Heyhoe, E., Pant, H., Woffenden, K., & Fisher, B. S. (2001). “The Kyoto Protocol, Impacts under the Terms of the Bonn Agreement.” In ABARE Conference Paper 28. Canberra.
Kallbekken, S. (2004). “The Cost of Sectoral Differentiation of Climate Policy: The Case of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.” In Paper Presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists in Budapest. June 15–28.
Keohane, R. O. (1995). “Complicance with International Standards: Environmental Case Studies.” In J. L. Hargrove (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighty-ninth Annual Meetings of the American Society of International Law. New York, pp. 206–224.
Manne, A. S. & Richels, R. G. (1999). “The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?” In J. Weyant, (ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy Journal. Vol. 21 (Special Issue), pp. 1–23.
Manne, A. S. & Richels, R. G. (2000). “A Multi-Gas Approach to Climate Policy—With and Without GWPs.” Paper presented at the EMF-19 Workshop in Washington, DC on March 22–23.
Manne, A. S. & Richels, R. G. (2001). “US Rejection of the Kyoto Protocol: The Impact on Compliance Costs and CO2 Emissions, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.” Working Paper 01–12.
Michaelowa, A. & Stronzig, M. (2002). “Transaction Costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms.” HWWA Discussion Paper 175, Hamburg.
Montero, J. P. (1999). “Voluntary Compliance with Market Based Environmental Policy: Evidence from the US-Acid Rain Program.” Journal of Political Economy. 107, 998–1033.
Montgomery, W. D. (1972). “Markets in Licences and Efficient Pollution Control Programs.” Journal of Economic Theory. 5, 395–418.
National Audit Office (of the UK) (2004). The UK-Emissions Trading Scheme, Report by the Comptroler and Auditor General, ordered by the House of Commons, London.
Oberthür, S. & Ott, H. E. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol. Berlin u.a.
Parry, I. W. H. (2003). “Fiscal Interactions and the Case for Carbon Taxes over Grandfathered Carbon Permits.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 19, 385–399.
Parry, I. W. H. & Williams, R. C. (1999). “A Second-Best Evaluation of Eight Policy Instruments to Reduce Carbon Emissions.” Resource and Energy Economics. 21, 347–373.
Parry, I. W. H., Williams, R. C., et al. (1999). “When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 37, 52–84.
Pizer, W. A. (2002). “Combining Price and Quantity Controls to Mitigate Global Climate Change.” Journal of Public Economics. 85, 409–434.
Portney, P. R. (2003). “Market-Based Approaches to Environmental Policy—A “Refresher” Course.” Resources. 151, 15–18.
Reeve, R. (2002). Policing International Trade in Endangered Species—The CITES Treaty and Compliance London.
Rubin, J. D. (1996). “A Model of Intertemporal Emissions Trading, Banking and Borrowing.” Journal of Environmental Journal of Economics and Management. 31, 269–286.
Sand, P. H. (ed.), (1992). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Cambridge.
Springer, U. (2003). “The Market for Tradable GHG Permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A Survey of Model Studies.” Energy Economics. 25, 527–551.
Stavins, R. N. (1995). “Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 29, 133–148.
Tietenberg, T. (2001). Emissions Trading Programs. Volume I, Aldershot.
Tulpulé, V., Brown, S., Lim, J., Polidano, C., Pant, H., & Fisher, B. S. (1999). “The Kyoto Protocol: An Economic Analysis Using GTEM.” In J. Weyant (ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi Model Evaluation, Energy Journal 21(Special Issue) pp. 257–285.
Victor, D. G. et al. (ed.) (1998). The Impementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. Cambridge, Mass. and London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Classification: Q54, Q58, K32
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Endres, A., Ohl, C. Kyoto, Europe?—An Economic Evaluation of the European Emission Trading Directive. Eur J Law Econ 19, 17–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-005-5274-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-005-5274-5