Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards more reliable non-linear mendelian randomization investigations

  • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burgess S, Davies NM, Thompson SG. Instrumental variable analysis with a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship. Epidemiology. 2014;25(6):877–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Staley JR, Burgess S. Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to mendelian randomization. Genet Epidemiol. 2017;41(4):341–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler HA. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 1991;266(1):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, et al. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2):417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burgess S, Davies NM, Thompson SG. Instrumental variable analysis with a nonlinear exposure–outcome relationship. Epidemiology. 2014;25(6):877.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgess S. Violation of the constant genetic effect assumption can result in biased estimates for non-linear mendelian randomization. Human Hered. 2023;88(1):79–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian H, Mason AM, Liu C, Burgess S. Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method. PLoS Genet. 2023;19(6):e1010823. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.28.497930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sofianopoulou E, Kaptoge SK, Afzal S, et al. Estimating dose-response relationships for vitamin D with coronary heart disease, stroke, and all-cause mortality: observational and mendelian randomisation analyses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12(1):e2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton FW, Hughes DA, Spiller W, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Non-linear mendelian randomization: detection of biases using negative controls with a focus on BMI, vitamin D and LDL-cholesterol. Eur J Epidemiol. 2024.

  10. Burgess S, Sun Y-Q, Zhou A, Buck C, Mason AM, Mai X-M. Body mass index and all-cause mortality in HUNT and UK Biobank studies: revised non-linear Mendelian randomization analyses. medRxiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fry A, Littlejohns TJ, Sudlow C, et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(9):1026–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoeler T, Speed D, Porcu E, Pirastu N, Pingault J-B, Kutalik Z. Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7:1216–27. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.28.509845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang G, Mason AM, Wood AM, Schooling CM, Burgess S. Dose-response associations of lipid traits with coronary artery Disease and Mortality. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(1):e2352572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mason AM, Burgess S. Software Application Profile: SUMnlmr, an R package that facilitates flexible and reproducible non-linear mendelian randomization analyses. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(6):2014–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac150.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee I-M, et al. Vitamin D supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burgess S, Thompson SG. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(3):755–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, et al. Guidelines for performing mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;4:186. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawlor DA, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1866–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Benjamin Woolf, Dipender Gill, and Guoyi Yang for useful discussions in the development of this work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (225790/Z/22/Z) and the United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00002/7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stephen Burgess

  2. Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stephen Burgess

Authors
  1. Stephen Burgess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB is the sole author of this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Burgess.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not relevant – this paper does not contain data.

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent to participate

Not relevant – this paper does not contain data.

Consent to publish

Not relevant – this paper does not contain data.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgess, S. Towards more reliable non-linear mendelian randomization investigations. Eur J Epidemiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01121-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01121-9

Search

Navigation