Skip to main content

War in Europe: health implications of environmental nuclear disaster amidst war


Recent incidents at nuclear facilities in Ukraine related to the attacks from Russian forces highlight the fragility of nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities in war and the very real potential for another environmental nuclear disaster and associated health risks in Europe. Nuclear catastrophes from war can occur from radioactive materials released from war threatened nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities in war zones, in addition to the direct threat from the deployment of nuclear weaponry and can result in immediate and long-term health impacts. Despite historical nuclear catastrophic events, including the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident and atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and that for more than a century epidemiologists have studied the consequences of radiation exposures, there are still major unanswered questions regarding radiation risks and human health. Epidemiologists will need to continue to quantify the health effects from exposure to environmental radiation, including background radiation, and are able to contribute to conversations about reliance on nuclear energy and alternative energy futures. As a society we are compelled to rethink our ties to nuclear energy, especially with the potential of increasing reliance on nuclear power amid oil and gas crisis and considering climate change, nuclear warfare, including nuclear weapon testing, and the fragility of humanity and health to even low doses of radiation from these and other natural and unnatural sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Availability of data and materials

There are no data associated with this publication.


  1. Cardis E, Hatch M. The Chernobyl accident–an epidemiological perspective. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol. May 2011;23(4):251–60. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wakeford R. UN Scientific Committee launches a new evaluation of thyroid cancer data in regions affected by the Chernobyl accident. J Radiol Prot Jun. 2018;38(2):876–7. doi:

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cahoon EK, Preston D, Zhang R, et al. Breast cancer risk in residents of Belarus exposed to Chernobyl fallout while pregnant or lactating: standardized incidence ratio analysis, 1997 to 2016. Int J Epidemiol Oct 23 2021;doi:

  4. Nations U. Chernobyl: The true scale of the accident. 2015.

  5. Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Mousseau TA, Møller AP. Ionizing radiation and taxonomic, functional and evolutionary diversity of bird communities. J Environ Manage Aug. 2018;15:220:183–90. doi:

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kotilainen AT, Kotilainen MM, Vartti VP, Hutri KL, Virtasalo JJ. Chernobyl still with us:. Mar Pollut Bull Nov. 2021;172:112924. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mouri G, Golosov V, Shiiba M, Hori T. Assessment of the caesium-137 flux adsorbed to suspended sediment in a reservoir in the contaminated Fukushima region in Japan. Environ Pollut Apr. 2014;187:31–41. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evangeliou N, Hamburger T, Talerko N, et al. Reconstructing the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP) accident 30 years after. A unique database of air concentration and deposition measurements over Europe. Environ Pollut Sep. 2016;216:408–18. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardis E, Krewski D, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident. Int J Cancer Sep. 2006;15(6):1224–35. doi: 119 ) .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugiyama H, Misumi M, Sakata R, Brenner AV, Utada M, Ozasa K. Mortality among individuals exposed to atomic bomb radiation in utero: 1950–2012. Eur J Epidemiol Apr. 2021;36(4):415–28. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamizo T, Cologne J, Cordova K, et al. Radiation effects on atherosclerosis in atomic bomb survivors: a cross-sectional study using structural equation modeling. Eur J Epidemiol Apr. 2021;36(4):401–14. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turcanu C, Perko T, Muric M, Popic JM, Geysmans R, Železnik N. Societal aspects of NORM: An overlooked research field. J Environ Radioact Apr. 2022;244–245:106827. doi:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Petryna A. Chernobyl’s survivors: Paralyzed by fatalism or overlooked by science? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2011/03/01 2011;67(2):30–37. doi:

Download references


Jessica E. Laine is supported by the European Union-funded RadoNorm project, Grant agreement ID: 900009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The author, Jessica E. Laine, contributed to the conception, preparation, writing of the manuscript and approval of final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica E Laine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Consent to participate

No participants were involved in this commentary.

Ethical approval

There is no ethical approval for this commentary.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laine, J.E. War in Europe: health implications of environmental nuclear disaster amidst war. Eur J Epidemiol 37, 221–225 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: