Abstract
The expansion of the concept of disease poses problems for epidemiology. Certainly, new diseases are discovered and more people are treated earlier and better. However, the historically unprecedented expansion is criticised for going too far. Overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and medicalization are some of the challenges heatedly debated in medicine, media, and in health policy making. How are we to analyse and handle the vast expansion of disease? Where can we draw the line between warranted and unwarranted expansion? To address this issue, which has wide implications for epidemiology, we need to understand how disease is expanded. This article identifies six ways that our conception of disease is expanded: by increased knowledge (epistemic), making more phenomena count as disease (ontological), doing more (pragmatic), defining more (conceptual), and by encompassing the bad (ethic) and the ugly (aesthetic). Expanding the subject matter of medicine extends its realm and power, but also its responsibility. It makes medicine accountable for ever more of human potential dis-eases. At the same time it blurs the borders and undermines the demarcation of medicine. Six specific advices can guide our action clarifying the subject matter of medicine in general and epidemiology in particular. To avoid unlimited responsibility and to keep medicine on par with its end, we need to direct the expansion of disease to what effectively identifies or reduces human suffering. Otherwise we will deplete medicine and undermine the greatest asset in health care: trust.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
With expansion I mean increasing the extension of disease.
References
De Sauvages F. Nosologia methodica sistens morborum classes. Amsterdam: Fratrum de Tournes; 1768/1968.
World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
Kawa S, Giordano J. A brief historicity of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice. Philos, Ethics, Humanit Med: PEHM. 2012;7:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-7-2.
World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) International Classification Committee, ICPC-2. International classification of primary care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Kaplan RM, Ong M. Rationale and public health implications of changing CHD risk factor definitions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:321–44.
Doust J, Vandvik PO, Qaseem A, et al. Guidance for modifying the definition of diseases: a checklist. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1020–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1302.
Glymour MM, Brickman AM, Kivimaki M, et al. Will biomarker-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease maximize scientific progress? Evaluating proposed diagnostic criteria. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(7):607–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0418-4.
Hofmann B, Welch HG. New diagnostic tests: more harm than good. BMJ (Clin Res Ed. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3314.
Reid L. Is an indistinct picture “exactly what we need”? Objectivity, accuracy, and harm in imaging for cancer. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(5):1055–64.
Hutchinson BD, Navin P, Marom EM, Truong MT, Bruzzi JF. Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism by pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):271–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13938.
Prasad V, Rho J, Cifu A. The diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism: a metaphor for medicine in the evidence-based medicine era. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(12):955–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.195.
Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. When a test is too good: how CT pulmonary angiograms find pulmonary emboli that do not need to be found. BMJ. 2013;347:f3368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3368.
Rogers WA, Mintzker Y. Getting clearer on overdiagnosis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(4):580–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12556.
Fisher ES, Welch HG. Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse? JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(5):446–53.
Welch HG. Less medicine, more health: 7 assumptions that drive too much medical care. Boston: Beacon Press; 2015.
Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq099.
Narod SA. Approaches of the treatment of DCIS. Breast. 2018;37:161–2.
Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B, et al. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):e234–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70598-9.
Nickel B, Moynihan R, Barratt A, Brito JP, McCaffery K. Renaming low risk conditions labelled as cancer. BMJ. 2018;362:k3322.
Bynum B. Drapetomania. Lancet. 2000;356(9241):1615.
Kmietowicz Z. Recognise obesity as a disease to reduce prevalence, says RCP. BMJ. 2019;364:l45.
Marchant GE, Campos-Outcalt DE, Lindor RA. Physician liability: the next big thing for personalized medicine? Pers Med. 2011;8(4):457–67. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.11.33.
De Ville K. Medical malpractice in twentieth century United States. The interaction of technology, law and culture. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14(2):197–211.
Hofmann B. Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(56):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8.
Hofmann B. Looking for trouble? Diagnostics expanding disease and producing patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12941.
Quebec Medical Association. Overdiagnosis: findings and action plan. Quebec: Quebec Medical Association; 2014.
Clark CC. Trust in medicine. J Med Philos. 2002;27(1):11–29.
O’neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Persson I, Savulescu J. Moral transhumanism. J Med Philos. 2010;35(6):656–69.
Moynihan R, Heath I, Henry D. Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering. BMJ. 2002;324(7342):886–91.
Moynihan R. The making of a disease: female sexual dysfunction. BMJ. 2003;326(7379):45–7.
Moynihan R. Scientists find new disease: motivational deficiency disorder. BMJ: Br Med J. 2006;332(7544):745.
Moynihan R. Medicalization. A new deal on disease definition. BMJ. 2011;342:d2548. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2548.
Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384.
Paprica PA, Culyer AJ, Elshaug AG, Peffer J, Sandoval GA. From talk to action: policy stakeholders, appropriateness, and selective disinvestment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(4):236–40.
Hughes E, McKenny K. Decommissioning and disinvestment toolkit 2013–2014 Rayleigh. Essex: Castle Point and Rochford Clinical Commissioning Group; 2013.
Haas M, Hall J, Viney R, Gallego G. Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. Aust Health Rev. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah11032.
Soril LJJ, Seixas BV, Mitton C, Bryan S, Clement FM. Moving low value care lists into action: prioritizing candidate health technologies for reassessment using administrative data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):640. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3459-1.
Scotland G, Bryan S. Why do health economists promote technology adoption rather than the search for efficiency? A proposal for a change in our approach to economic evaluation in health care. Med Decis Mak: Int J Soc Med Decis Mak. 2017;37(2):139–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x16653397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofmann, B. Expanding disease and undermining the ethos of medicine. Eur J Epidemiol 34, 613–619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00496-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00496-4