Skip to main content
Log in

You are smarter than you think: (super) machine learning in context

  • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Wolpert DH. Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 1992;5(2):241–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naimi AI, Balzer LB. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0390-z.

  3. Murphy K. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. 1st ed. Cambridge: The MIT press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenland S. Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):301–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenland S. Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studies. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(9–10):445–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller CJ, MacLehose RF. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):962–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Westreich D, Lessler J, Funk MJ. Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):826–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Laan MJ, Rose S. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Berlin: Springer; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Laan MJ, Starmans RJ. Entering the era of data science: targeted learning and the integration of statistics and computational data analysis. Advances in Statistics; 2014.

  10. Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, et al. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econom J. 2017;21:C1–C68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee BK, Lessler J, Stuart EA. Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Stat Med. 2010;29(3):337–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Watkins S, Jonsson-Funk M, Brookhart MA, Rosenberg SA, O’Shea TM, Daniels J. An empirical comparison of tree-based methods for propensity score estimation. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(5):1798–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12068.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelman A, Loken E. The garden of forking paths: why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University. 2013.

  14. Polley EC, van der Laan MJ. Super learner in prediction. Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley2010 Contract No.: 222.

  15. Robins JM. Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference. Epidemiology. 2001;12(3):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH/NICHD (Grant # DP2-HD08-4070) and NIH/NIAID (Grant # K01AI125087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander P. Keil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keil, A.P., Edwards, J.K. You are smarter than you think: (super) machine learning in context. Eur J Epidemiol 33, 437–440 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0405-9

Keywords

Navigation