Skip to main content
Log in

The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements

  • DIALOGUE
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the first instalment of this series, Stang and Poole provided an overview of Fisher significance testing (ST), Neyman–Pearson null hypothesis testing (NHT), and their unfortunate and unintended offspring, null hypothesis significance testing. In addition to elucidating the distinction between the first two and the evolution of the third, the authors alluded to alternative models of statistical inference; namely, Bayesian statistics. Bayesian inference has experienced a revival in recent decades, with many researchers advocating for its use as both a complement and an alternative to NHT and ST. This article will continue in the direction of the first instalment, providing practicing researchers with an introduction to Bayesian inference. Our work will draw on the examples and discussion of the previous dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stang A, Poole C. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(12):939–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenland S. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(3):765–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman SN. Introduction to Bayesian methods I: measuring the strength of evidence. Clin Trials. 2005;2(4):282–290; discussion 301–284, 364–278.

  4. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: the Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(12):1005–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MacLehose R, Hamra G. Applications of Bayesian methods to epidemiologic research. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014;1(3):103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacLehose RF, Hamra GB. Applications of Bayesian methods to epidemiologic research. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014;1:103–9.

  8. Greenland S. Principles of multilevel modelling. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(1):158–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamra GB, MacLehose RF, Cole SR. Sensitivity analyses for sparse-data problems—using weakly informative Bayesian priors. Epidemiology. 2013;24(2):233–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(3):340–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenland S. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(5):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenland S. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research II. Regression analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(1):195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lash TL, Fox MP, Fink AK. Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data. Dordrecht; New York: Springer; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Steenland K, Greenland S. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):384–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenland S. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research. III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods (vol 38, p. 1662, 2009). Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(4):1116.

  16. Hamra G, Richardson D, Maclehose R, Wing S. Integrating informative priors from experimental research with Bayesian methods: an example from radiation epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2013;24(1):90–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu H, Cole SR. Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with common outcomes: a Bayesian approach. Epidemiology. 2010;21(6):855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cole SR, Chu HT, Greenland S, Hamra G, Richardson DB. Bayesian posterior distributions without Markov chains. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(5):368–75.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan SG, Greenland S. Bayesian regression in SAS software. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):308–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan SG, Greenland S. Bayesian regression in SAS software. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghassan B. Hamra.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TXT 6 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamra, G.B., Stang, A. & Poole, C. The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements. Eur J Epidemiol 30, 1003–1008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0054-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0054-1

Keywords

Navigation