Abstract
In order to come to a reliable evaluation of the effectiveness of the chosen vaccination policy regarding meningococcal disease, the completeness of registrations on meningococcal disease in the Netherlands was estimated with the capture–recapture method. Data over 1993–1998 were collected from (A) mandatory notifications (n = 2926); (B) hospital registration (n = 3968); (C) laboratory surveillance (n = 3484). As the standard capture–recapture method does not take into account false positive diagnoses, we developed a model to adjust for the lack of specificity of our sources. We estimated that 1363 cases were not registered in any of the three sources in the period of study. The completeness of the three sources was therefore estimated at 49% for source A, 67% for source B and 58% for source C. After adjustment for false positive diagnoses, the completeness of source A, B, and C was estimated as 52%, 70% and 62%, respectively. The capture–recapture methods offer an attractive approach to estimate the completeness of surveillance sources and hence contribute to a more accurate estimate of the disease burden under study. However, the method does not account for higher-order interactions or presence of false positive diagnoses. Being aware of these limitations, the capture–recapture method still elucidates the (in)completeness of sources and gives a rough estimate of this (in)completeness. This makes a more accurate monitoring of disease incidence possible and hence attributes to a more reliable foundation for the design and evaluation of health interventions such as vaccination programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AIC:
-
Akaike Information Criterion
- df:
-
Degree of freedom
- ICD:
-
International Classification of Diseases
- IGZ:
-
Inspectorate of Health Care
- MHS:
-
Municipal Health Service
- NMR:
-
National Medical Registration
- NRBM:
-
National Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis
- SAS:
-
Statistical Analysis System
References
M Deuren Particlevan P Brandtzaeg JWM Meer Particlevan der (2000) ArticleTitleUpdate on meningococcal disease with emphasis on pathogenesis and clinical management Clin Microbiol Rev 13 IssueID1 144–166 Occurrence Handle10627495 Occurrence Handle10.1128/CMR.13.1.144-166.2000
NE Rosenstein BA Perkins DS Stephens T Popovic JM Hughes (2001) ArticleTitleMeningococcal disease N Engl J Med 344 IssueID18 1378–1388 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200105033441807 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjslKnsrw%3D Occurrence Handle11333996
CJPA Hoebe HE Melker Particlede L Spanjaard J Dankert N Nagelkerke (2004) ArticleTitleSpace–time cluster analysis of invasive meningococcal disease Emerg Infect Dis 10 1621–6 Occurrence Handle15498165
Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis. Bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands. Annual report 2001. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 2002
M Vries Particlede J Dankert H Ruijs A Timen S Greeff Particlede H Melker Particlede (2002) ArticleTitleUniversal vaccination against group C meningococci and pneumococci; advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands [Dutch] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146 1562–1563 Occurrence Handle12212505
EB Hook RR Regal (1995) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations Epidemiol Rev 17 IssueID2 243–264 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283mtFeiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8654510
JT Wittes T Colton VW Sidel (1974) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture methods for assessing the completeness of case ascertainment when using multiple information sources J Chronic Dis 27 25–36 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(74)90005-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE2c7htVKjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle4815069
RM Cormack (1999) ArticleTitleProblems with using capture–recapture in epidemiology: an example of a measles epidemic J Clin Epidemiol 52 IssueID10 909–914 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00058-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvktF2isg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10513752
InstitutionalAuthorNameInternational Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting (1995) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture and multiple-record␣systems estimation 1: history and theoretical development Am J Epidemiol 142 1047–1058
P Pezzotti C Piovesan F Zanella et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEstimating the cumulative number of human immunodeficiency virus diagnoses by cross-linking from four different sources Int J Epidemiol 32 778–783 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ije/dyg202 Occurrence Handle14559749
YMM Bishop SE Fienberg PW Holland (1989) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 237–245
H Brenner (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of misdiagnoses on disease monitoring with capture–recapture methods J Clin Epidemiol 49 1303–1307 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(95)00026-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FkslGkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8892499
KL Davison NS Crowcroft ME Ramsay et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEnhanced surveillance scheme for suspected meningococcal disease in five regional health authorities in England: 1998 Commun Dis Public Health 5 IssueID3 205–212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nnsVOiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12434690
Statline Central Statistics Netherlands, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen, 2003 Available from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/table.asp?TT=2&LA= nl&DM=SLNL&PA=7042mc&D1=322–325&D2= 13–18
A Chao PK Tsay SH Lin WY Shau DY Chao (2001) ArticleTitleThe applications of capture–recapture models to epidemiological data Statist Med 20 3123–3157 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sim.996 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksVWrsg%3D%3D
EB Hook RR Regal (2000) ArticleTitleAccuracy of alternative approaches to capture–recapture estimates of disease frequency: internal validity analysis of data from five sources Am J Epidemiol 152 771–779 Occurrence Handle10.1093/aje/152.8.771 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgsVSjtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11052556
DM Ackman G Birkhead M Flynn (1996) ArticleTitleAssessment of surveillance for meningococcal disease in New York stat, 1991 Am J Epidemiol 144 78–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283lvFCltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8659488
L Spanjaard P Bol W Ekker HC Zanen (1985) ArticleTitleThe incidence of bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands – a comparison of three registration systems, 1977–1982 J Infect 11 259–268 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0163-4453(85)93327-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL287htlGntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle4086869
LA Davies (1989) ArticleTitleAssessing the value of different sources of information on meningococcal disease Community Med 11 IssueID3 239–246 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c7gslenug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2605892
EM Laska (2002) ArticleTitleThe use of capture–recapture methods in public health Bull World Health Organ 80 IssueID11 845 Occurrence Handle12481204
L Papoz B Balkau J Lellouch (1996) ArticleTitleCase counting in epidemiology: limitations of methods based on multiple data sources Int J Epidemiol 25 IssueID3 474–478 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zisVymtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8671546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Greeff, S.C., Spanjaard, L., Dankert, J. et al. Underreporting of Meningococcal Disease Incidence in the Netherlands: Results from a Capture–Recapture Analysis Based on Three Registration Sources with Correction for False Positive Diagnoses. Eur J Epidemiol 21, 315–321 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-0020-z
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-0020-z