Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing total prevalence rate of cases with Down syndrome in Hungary

  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently the population-based large data set of the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry showed an increase in the recorded total (birth + fetal) prevalence rate of informative offspring with Down syndrome. This finding was checked and confirmed in the completed data set due to the field study including all cytogenetic labs and prenatal diagnostic centres. The previous birth prevalence of 1.17 per 100 in the 1970s increased to 1.50 per 1000 between 1989 and 1999 with a maximum 1.77 in 1992. The completeness of the Registry was only 65.9% between 1970 and 1999, i.e. 30 years. One-third of trisomy 21 have not been karyotyped, however, recently this figure was about 10%. The major explanation of this increase is the significantly higher proportion of prenatally diagnosed fetuses with Down syndrome and an increasing part of women over 35. In addition better ascertainment may also contribute to this increase, but new etiological factors cannot also be excluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AE Czeizel (1989) ArticleTitleHungarian surveillance of germinal mutations Hum. Genet 82 359–366 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaB1M%2Fot1w%3D Occurrence Handle2525516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MA Abruzzo TJ Hassold (1995) ArticleTitleEtiology of nondisjunction in humans Environ Mol Mutagen 26 38–47

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein CJ. (Eds) (1991) Morphogenesis of Down Syndrome. Wiley-Liss New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. M Hattori A Fujiyama TD Taylor et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe DNA sequence of human chromosome 21 Nature 405 311–319 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjs1KlsL8%3D Occurrence Handle10830953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. NJ Roizen D Patterson (2003) ArticleTitleDown’s syndrome Lancet 361 1281–1289 Occurrence Handle12699967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. T Hassold S Sherman (2000) ArticleTitleDown syndrome: genetic recombinaton and the origin of the extra chromosome 21 Clin Genet 57 95–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7pslKktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10735628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. LS Penrose (1933) ArticleTitleThe relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism J Genet 27 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  8. PW Yoon SB Freeman SL Sherman LF Taft Y Gu D Pettay DW Flansers MJ Khoury TJ Hassold (1996) ArticleTitleAdvenced maternal age and the risk of Down syndrome characterized by the meiotic stage of the chromosomal error: A population-based study Am J Hum Genet 58 628–633 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3czmsVU%3D Occurrence Handle8644722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. P Verger (1997) ArticleTitleDown syndrome and ionizing radiation Health Phys 73 882–893 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXnsFGitL8%3D Occurrence Handle9373065

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K Källen (1997) ArticleTitleDown’s syndrome and maternal smoking in early pregnancy Genet Epidemiol 14 77–84 Occurrence Handle9055063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J Kline Z Stein (1985) Environmental causes of aneuploidy: Who so elusive. VL Dellarco PE Voytek A Hollander (Eds) Aneuploidy. Etiology and Mechanism. Plenum Press New York 149–164

    Google Scholar 

  12. AE Czeizel Elek Cs S Gundy J Métneki E Nemes A Reis K Sperling L Timár G Tusnády Z Virágh (1993) ArticleTitleEnvironmental trichlorphon and cluster of congenital abnormalities Lancet 341 539–542 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2s3ot1Y%3D Occurrence Handle8094783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Annual Report of the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry. National Center for Epidemiology. Budapest: Hungary, 1994–1999

  14. AE Czeizel (1997) ArticleTitleFirst 25 years of the Hungarian Congenital Abnormalitiy Registry Teratology 55 299–305 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlt1Shur8%3D Occurrence Handle9261923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AE Czeizel L Telegdi G Tusnády (Eds) (1988) Multiple Congenital Abnormalities. Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  16. AE Czeizel M Rockenbauer Cs Siffel E Varga (2001) ArticleTitleDescription and mission evaluation of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996 Teratology 63 176–185 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjtlGnsL8%3D Occurrence Handle11320528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demographic Yearbooks. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. Budapest: Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 1970–1999

  18. HS Cuckle NJ Wald SG Thompson (1987) ArticleTitleEstimating a woman’s risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down’s syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94 387–402 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB3MvhtVA%3D Occurrence Handle2437951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. AE Czeizel (1988) ArticleTitleSome epidemiological characteristics of Down’s syndrome in Hungary Acta Morph Hung 36 63–77 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaB38rjtVw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C Stoll Y Alembik B Dott M Roth (1990) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of Down syndrome in 118,265 consecutive births Am J Med Genet Suppl 7 79–83 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2Mfpt10%3D Occurrence Handle2149980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. AJ Staples GR Sutherland EA Haan S Clisby (1991) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of Down syndrome in South Australia, 1960–1989 Am J Hum Genet 49 1014–1024 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D38ngvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle1833972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. E Krivchenia CA Huether LD Edmonds D May S Guckenberger (1993) ArticleTitleComparative epidemiology of Down syndrome in two United States population, 1970–1989 Am J Epidemiol 137 828

    Google Scholar 

  23. CA Huether K Haraldson PM Ellis CN Ramsay (1996a) ArticleTitleImpact of prenatal diagnosed on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian Region of Scotland, 1978–1992 Genet Epidemiol 13 367–375 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2cbptFU%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. CA Huether RLM Martin SM Stoppelman S O’Souza JK Bishop CP Torfs F Lorey KM May JS Hanna PA Baird JC Kelley (1996b) ArticleTitleSex ratio in fetuses and liveborn infants with autosomal aneuploidy Am J Med Genet 63 492–500 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA28zotVI%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. AD Carothers E Boyd G Lother PM Ellis DA Couzin MJW Fead A Robb (1999a) ArticleTitleTrends in prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and other autosomal trisomies in Scotland 1990 to 1994 with associated cytogenetic and epidemiological findings Genet Epidemiol 16 179–190 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ltlCksw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. AD Carothers CA Hecht EB Hook (1999b) ArticleTitleInternational variation in reported livebirth prevalence rates of Down syndrome, adjusted for maternal age J Med Genet 36 386–393 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3otVamsA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. JK Morris DE Mutton E Alberman (2000) ArticleTitleRevised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome Physiol Res 49 227–231 Occurrence Handle10984088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. C Julian-Reynier Y Aurran A Dumaret et al. (1995) ArticleTitleAttitudes towards Down’s syndrome: follo-up of a cohort of 280 cases J Med Genet 32 597–599 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD38%2Flt1E%3D Occurrence Handle7473649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. A Bernheim C Chastang M Heaulme Particlede J Gronchy Particlede (1979) ArticleTitleExces de garcons dans la trisomie 21 Ann Genet 22 122–124

    Google Scholar 

  30. MA Ferguson-Smith (1962) ArticleTitleAbnormal sex ratios in the autosomal trisomy syndrome Lancet 2 357–358

    Google Scholar 

  31. EB Hook PK Cross DE Mutton (1999) ArticleTitleFemale predominance (low sex ratio) in 47+21 mozaics Am J Med Genet 84 316–319 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntVCluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10340644

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. D Mutton E Alberman EB Hook (1996) ArticleTitleCytogenetic and epidemiological findings in Down syndrome, England and Wales 1989 to 1993 J Med Genet 33 387–394 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3M7mslA%3D Occurrence Handle8733049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. EB Hook BB Topol PK Cross (1989) ArticleTitleThe natural history of cytogenetically abnormal fetuses detected at midtrimester amniocentesis which are not terminated electively: new data and estimates of the excess and relative risk of late fetal death associated with 47, +21 and some other abnormal kariotypes Am J Hum Genet 45 855–861 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BD2s3gs1E%3D Occurrence Handle2589318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. B Leonard CK Bower B Petterson H Leonard (2000) ArticleTitleSurvival of infants born with Down’ syndrome: 1980–1996 Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 14 163–171 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ltVejsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10791661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Q Yang SA Rasmussen JM Friedman (2002) ArticleTitleMortality associated with Down’s syndrome in the USA from 1983 to 1997; a population-based study Lancet 359 1019–1025 Occurrence Handle11937181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. HJ Evans MF Lyon AE Czeizel (1986) ArticleTitleIs the incidence of Down syndrome increasing? Mutat Res 175 263––266 Occurrence Handle2946950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. K Sperling J Pelz RD Wegner I Schulake E Struck (1991) ArticleTitleFrequency of trisomy 21 in Germany before and after the Chernobyl accident Biomed Pharmacother 45 255–262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D3czislE%3D Occurrence Handle1832977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. J Bishop CA Huether (1987) ArticleTitleRevised estimates and projections of Down syndrome births in the United States, and the effects of prenatal diagnosis utilization, 1910–2002 Prenat Diagn 7 261–271 Occurrence Handle2954038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Down syndrome prevalence at birth – United States, 1983–1990. MMWR 1994; 43: 607–622

    Google Scholar 

  40. C Stoll Y Alembik B Dott et al. (1998) ArticleTitleStudy of Down syndrome in 238942 consecutive births Ann Genet 41 44–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mt1ertw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9599651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sixto G-M, Laiz S. Inreasing total prevalence of trisomy 21 in the Bask country, Spain. Eur J Hum Genet 1999; 7: 80 (Suppl 1)

    Google Scholar 

  42. EB Hook DE Mutton R Ide E Alberman M Bobrow (1995) ArticleTitleThe natural history of Down syndrome conceptuses diagnosed prenatally that are not electively terminated Am J Hum Genet 57 875–881 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD38bivVY%3D Occurrence Handle7573049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Mikkelsen (1988) ArticleTitleThe incidence of Down’ syndrome and progress toward its reduction Philos Trans R Soc. London Ser B–324

    Google Scholar 

  44. M Mikkelsen (1992) ArticleTitleThe impact of prenatal diagnosis on the incidence of Down syndrome in Denmark Birth Defects 28 44–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2cvnt1M%3D Occurrence Handle1489956

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. J Halliday J Lumley L Watson (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of women who do and do not have amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling Lancet 345 704–709 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC1M7islE%3D Occurrence Handle7885127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. CN Ramsay PM Ellis H Zealley (1991) ArticleTitleDown’ syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland - 1978 to 1989 Biomed Pharmacother 45 267–272 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D3czislM%3D Occurrence Handle1832978

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. AE Czeizel G Tusnády (1972) ArticleTitleSome biological aspects of differential family planning Adv Biol Human Population 13 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  48. PA Baird AD Sadovnick (1988) ArticleTitleMaternal age-specific rates for Down syndrome: Changes over time Am J Med Genet 29 917–927 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieB1M3ksVE%3D Occurrence Handle2969681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. AD Carothers (1995) ArticleTitleMethods for maternal age-standardization of the incidence of congenital abnormalities Stat Med 14 1797–1806 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2cfmslc%3D Occurrence Handle7481211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. RJM Snijders P Noble N Sebire A Souka KH Nicolaides (1998) ArticleTitleUK multicenter project on the assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation Lancet 351 343–346

    Google Scholar 

  51. AE Czeizel Elek Cs E Susánszky (1991) ArticleTitleThe evaluation of the germinal mutagenic impact of Chernobyl radiological contamination in Hungary Mutagenesis 6 285–288 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2cfltVw%3D Occurrence Handle1834914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. AE Czeizel (1996) ArticleTitleHuman germinal mutagenic effects in relation to intentional and accidental exposure to toxic agents Environ Health Perspect 104 615–617 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjvV2ns7o%3D Occurrence Handle8781392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. JE Haddow (1998) ArticleTitleAntenatal screening for Down’ syndrome: Where are we and where next? Lancet 352 336–337 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czot1Sitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9717914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew E. Czeizel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Métneki, J., Czeizel, A.E. Increasing total prevalence rate of cases with Down syndrome in Hungary. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 525–535 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-4261-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-4261-z

Keywords

Navigation