Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency of Chest Radiography and Abdominal Ultrasound in The Netherlands: 1999–2003

  • Radiology
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 January 2006

Abstract

Chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound are two widely used diagnostic imaging techniques in Western societies. However, little is known about the frequency of these examinations and its determinants. The aim of this descriptive study was to provide detailed information on the number of chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound examinations by age, gender, referring physician and ethnicity. We used data of approximately 3,000,000 sick fund insured persons of the Health Insurance Company Agis in The Netherlands from 1999 to 2003. We calculated annual numbers and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for different age, gender and ethnicity categories. The mean age of the population was 38±22 years and 46% were male. Chest radiographs were ordered in 130 per 1000 persons per year and abdominal ultrasound examinations in 39 per 1000 persons per year; these frequencies did not change noticeable over the five-year period. Chest radiography was performed more often in males (156 vs. 109 per 1,000 persons/year in females; p<0.05) and abdominal ultrasound more often in females (43 vs. 34 per 1000 persons/year in males; p<0.05). Frequencies were highest in persons aged 70–79 years. Compared to medical specialists, general practitioners more frequently referred younger patients and females, especially for abdominal ultrasound. Up to the age of 60 years the frequencies of both chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound were higher in Turks and Moroccans compared to other persons. In conclusion, this study showed marked differences in the frequencies of chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound according to age, gender and ethnicity in The Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Radiology, ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the performance of paediatric and adult chest radiography 2001; 1–5.

  2. American College of Radiology. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for performing and interpreting diagnostic ultrasound examinations 2000; 1–2.

  3. American College of Radiology. ACR Standards. ACR Standard for the performance of an ultrasound examination of the abdomen or retroperitoneum 2001; 1–5.

  4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR,. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Volume I: Sources. New York: United Nations: Annex D Medical radiation exposures, 2000, 293–495.

  5. Beentjes LB, Timmermans WM. Age and sex specific radiographic examination frequency in The Netherlands. Br J Radiol 1990; 63691–63697.

  6. A Aroua R Bize I Buchillier-Decka JP Vader JF Valley P Schnyder (2003) ArticleTitleX-ray imaging of the chest in Switzerland in 1998: a nationwide survey Eur Radiol 13 IssueID6 1250–1259 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ktFajuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12764639

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. http://statline.cbs.nl

  8. HM Smeets CC Ros (2004) ArticleTitleHealth care usage by Moroccans and Turks compared to the indigenous Dutch population: no higher consumption of health care and lower medication costs Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148 IssueID25 1243–1247 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czpslGltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15301388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. KJ Rothman (2002) Epidemiology: An Introduction Oxford University Press Inc New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Molarius A, Parsons RW, Dobson AJ, Evans A, Fortmann SP, Jamrozik K, et al. Trends in cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s: Findings from the WHO MONICA project. Am J Public Health 2001; 91206–91212.

  11. Travis WD, Lubin J, Ries L, Devesa S. United States lung carcinoma incidence trends. Declining for most histologic types among males, increasing among females. Cancer 1996; 772464–772470.

  12. CF Caracta (2003) ArticleTitleGender differences in pulmonary disease Mt Sinai J Med 70 IssueID4 215–224 Occurrence Handle12968194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crawford CM, Hurtgen-Grace K, Talarico E, Marley J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: an illustrated narrative review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003; 26184 26195.

  14. LM Prisant JS Mondy (2004) ArticleTitleImages in hypertension: abdominal aortic aneurysm J Clin Hypertens 6 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adelman AM, Revicki DA, Maganizer J, Hebel R. Abdominal pain in an HMO. Fam Med 1995; 27321– 27325.

  16. EA Mayer B Naliboff O Lee J Munakata L Chang (1999) ArticleTitleReview article: gender-related differences in functional gastrointestinal disorders Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13 IssueID5 65–69 Occurrence Handle10429743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reijneveld SA. Reported health, lifestyles, and use of health care of first generation immigrants in The Netherlands: do socioeconomic factors explain their adverse position?. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52298–52304.

  18. MG Weide M Foets (1998) ArticleTitleMigrants in general practice: different from Dutch in complaints and diagnoses Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 142 IssueID38 2105–2109 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FntlCmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9856225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anouk M. Speets.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-9144-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speets, A.M., Kalmijn, S., Hoes, A.W. et al. Frequency of Chest Radiography and Abdominal Ultrasound in The Netherlands: 1999–2003. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 1031–1036 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-2954-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-2954-y

Keywords

Navigation