Abstract
Background
Research on the impact of changes in healthcare policy, developments in community and public health and determinants of health and disease during lifetime may effectively make use of routine healthcare data. These data, however, need to meet minimal criteria for quality and completeness. Research opportunities are further improved when routine data are supplemented with a standardized ‘baseline’ assessment of the full population. This formed the basis for a new study initiated in a newly developed large residential area in Leidsche Rijn, part of the city of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Methods
All new inhabitants are invited by their general practitioner to participate in the Utrecht Health Project (UHP). Informed consent is obtained and an individual health profile (IHP) is made by dedicated research nurses. The IHP is the starting point for the UHP research database as well as for the primary care electronic medical records. Follow-up data are collected through continuous linkage with the computerized medical files recorded by the general practitioners. UHP staff in each practice takes care of quality management of registration as well as data handling.
Results
Currently, over 60 of invited new residents in the area have given informed consent with participation steadily increasing.
Discussion
The Utrecht Health Project combines key elements of traditional epidemiologic cohort studies with the current power of routine electronic medical record keeping in primary care. The research approach optimizes routine health care data for use in scientific research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
HJ Sixma EH Langerak AJ Schrijvers J Bent Particlevan der (1993) ArticleTitleAttempting to reduce hospital costs by strengthening primary care institutions. The Dutch Health Care Demonstration Project in the new town of Almere JAMA 269 2567–2572
LR Derogatis RS Lipman L Covi (1973) ArticleTitleSCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale – Preliminary report Psychopharmacol Bull 9 13–27
BM Widenfelt Particlevan AW Goedhart PD Treffers R Goodman (2003) ArticleTitleDutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12 281–289
SJO Veldhuyzenvan Zanten KMAJ Tytgat PT Pollak J Goldie RL Goodacre RH Riddell RH Hunt (1993) ArticleTitleCan severity of symptoms be used as an outcome measure in trials of non-ulcer dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis J Clin Epidemiol 46 273–279
GA Rose H Blackburn (1968) ArticleTitleCardiovascular survey methods Monogr Ser World Health Organ 56 1–188
J Ormel MW Koeter W Brink Particlevan den G Willige Particlevan de (1991) ArticleTitleRecognition, management, and course of anxiety and depression in general practice Arch Gen Psychiatr 48 700–706
JE Ware CD Sherbourne (1992) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 473–483 Occurrence Handle1593914
H Lamberts M Wood (Eds) (1987) ICPC: International classification of primary care Oxford University Press Oxford
N Katier CS Uiterwaal BM Jong Particlede JL Kimpen TJ Verheij DE Grobbe B Brunekreef ME Numans CK Ent Particlevan der (2004) ArticleTitleThe wheezing illnesses study Leidsche Rijn (WHISTLER): Rationale and design Eur J Epidemiol 19 895–903
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grobbee, D.E., Hoes, A.W., Verheij, T.J.M. et al. The Utrecht Health Project: Optimization of routine healthcare data for research. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 285–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-004-5689-2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-004-5689-2