Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative risk analysis of sediment heavy metals using the positive matrix factorization-based ecological risk index method: a case of the Kuye River, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying the sources of heavy metals (HMs) in river sediments is crucial to effectively mitigate sediment HM pollution and control its associated ecological risks in coal-mining areas. In this study, ecological risks resulting from different pollution sources were evaluated using an integrated method combining the positive matrix factorization (PMF) and the potential ecological risk index (RI) model. A total of 59 sediment samples were collected from the Kuye River and analyzed for eight HMs (Zn, Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb, As, Cd, and Hg). The obtained results showed that the sediment HM contents were higher than the corresponding soil background values in Shaanxi Province. The average sediment Hg content was 3.42 times higher than the corresponding background value. The PMF results indicated that HMs in the sediments were mainly derived from industrial, traffic, agricultural, and coal-mining sources. The RI values ranged from 26.15 to 483.70. Hg was the major contributor (75%) to the ecological risk in the vicinity of the Yanjiata Industrial Park. According to the PMF-based RI model, coal-mining activities exhibited the strongest impact on the river ecosystem (48.79%), followed, respectively, by traffic (34.41%), industrial (12.70%), and agricultural (4.10%) activities. These results indicated that the major anthropogenic sources contributing to the HM contents in the sediments are not necessarily those posing the greatest ecological risks. The proposed integrated approach in this study was useful in evaluating the ecological risks associated with different anthropogenic sources in the Kuye River, providing valuable suggestions for reducing sediment HM pollution and effectively protecting river ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51969031, 52169006), the Shaanxi Science and Technology Innovation Team (No. 2022TD-08), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (No. 2019KFKT-13), the Shaanxi Key Scientific Research Plan of Education Department (No. 22JS045), the Yulin ‘Scientists + Engineers’ Team Project (YLKG-2022–10), and Yulin University Scientific Research Project (1517-2021JJJB13, 1517-2021SKJJB19).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YZ: Experiment, Data analysis, Writing-original draft; XW: Conceptualization, Writing-review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition; YD: Writing-original draft; JL: Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xijun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wu, X., Dong, Y. et al. Quantitative risk analysis of sediment heavy metals using the positive matrix factorization-based ecological risk index method: a case of the Kuye River, China. Environ Geochem Health 46, 50 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01836-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01836-w

Keywords

Navigation