Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glyphosate uses, adverse effects and alternatives: focus on the current scenario in Brazil

  • Review
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brazil, a global frontrunner in pesticide consumption and sales, particularly glyphosate, appears to be at odds with other countries that increasingly ban these products in their territories. This study gathers the values of Acceptable Daily Intake and Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) in the European Union for dozens of substances and subsequently contrasts them with the corresponding benchmarks upheld in Brazil concerning its predominant crops. Furthermore, this study delves into the toxicity levels and the potential health ramifications of glyphosate on humans through the ingestion of food containing its residues. The findings from this research underscore a notable surge in glyphosate and pesticide sales and usage within Brazil over the past decade. In stark contrast to its European counterparts, Brazil not only sanctioned the sale and application of 474 new pesticides in 2019, but extended the authorization for glyphosate sales while downgrading its toxicity classification. Finally, this review not only uncovers disparities among research outcomes but also addresses the complexities of replacing glyphosate and introduces environmentally friendlier alternatives that have been subject to evaluation in the existing literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

LGA gratefully acknowledges the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs as well as the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research for funding his research grant in France under the framework of the MOPGA program. All authors are grateful to the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) for funding the TALiSMAN and TALiSMAN2 projects.

Funding

De Araujo, L.G. acknowledge the MOPGA research grant in France, funded by the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs, in collaboration with the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by LGA and DFZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LGA and DFZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. AC and VF supervised all steps of this investigation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leandro Goulart de Araujo or Vanessa Fierro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 155 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Araujo, L.G., Zordan, D.F., Celzard, A. et al. Glyphosate uses, adverse effects and alternatives: focus on the current scenario in Brazil. Environ Geochem Health 45, 9559–9582 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01763-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01763-w

Keywords

Navigation