Skip to main content
Log in

Elucidating of potentially toxic elements contamination in topsoils around a copper smelter: Spatial distribution, partitioning and risk estimation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil pollution by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) as one of the major environmental hazards is associated with metal exploration and refining acting. In this study, forty-five topsoil samples surrounding a copper smelter factory were taken and analysed using standard routine methods. The total concentration, chemical fractionation and the mobility potential of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn were analysed. Additionally, the spatial distribution of PTEs, the potential ecotoxicological, and human health risks was assessed. The range of total Cu was 1478–4718 mg kg−1, reaching up to 501.5, 21.6, 118.4, 573.5 and 943.3 mg kg−1 for total contents of As, Cd, Cr, Pb and Zn, respectively. The potentially available fractions after sequential extraction reveal all studied PTE were dramatically mobile and available in the studied area (86%, 69.3%, 59.5%, 87.2%, 84% and 68% for As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn and Cu, respectively), reflecting that the concentration and accumulation of these elements are profoundly affected or originated by smelting activities and deposition of atmospheric emissions of the Cu smelting factory. The spatial distribution of all PTEs indicated that concentrations of these element near the smelter Cu-factory were elevated. Accordingly, the ecotoxicology status of the studied area suggests that significantly high risks are posed by the measured PTEs. Non-carcinogenic effects of As, Pb and Cu were significantly much higher than the recommended value (HI = 1), suggesting that these three PTEs could adversely impact children's health. For adults, only the HI value of As was greater than one.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Meysam Akhoondi and Amin Heydariyan for their assistance during the sampling and laboratory chemical analysis. We acknowledge the financial support from the FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal) and CIIMAR for their individual research contract (CEECIND/03794/2017) and the Strategic Funding UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020.

Funding

ARS would like to express their thanks to the FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal) and CIIMAR for their individual research contract (CEECIND/03794/2017) and the Strategic Funding UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Milad Mirzaei Aminiyan contributed to writing—original draft, chemical analysis, investigation, methodology, mapping and GIS analysis, and project administration; Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman contributed to writing—review and editing; Andres Rodriguez-Seijo contributed to writing—review and editing; Raziyeh Hajiali Begloo contributed to data analysis and Public Health Methodology; Meysam Cheraghi contributed to chemical analysis, investigation, and methodology; Farzad Mirzaei Aminiyan contributed to formal analysis, methodology, and conceptualization.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Milad Mirzaei Aminiyan or Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they absolutely have no competing interests.

Data availability and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies involving animal or human participants performed by any of the authors. All of the authors have read and approved the paper for submission of publication. The manuscript in part or in full has not been submitted or published anywhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4051 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aminiyan, M.M., Rahman, M.M., Rodríguez-Seijo, A. et al. Elucidating of potentially toxic elements contamination in topsoils around a copper smelter: Spatial distribution, partitioning and risk estimation. Environ Geochem Health 44, 1795–1811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01057-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01057-z

Keywords

Navigation