Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 915–922 | Cite as

A method to determine the protection zone of chemical industrial park considering air quality, health risk and environmental risk: a case study

Short Communication


In China, chemical enterprises are required to cluster into a large number of chemical industrial parks (CIPs), which increase risks and threats to the environment and human being’s health due to aggregation of the complicated chemical process and huge unit scale. Setting a scientific and reasonable protection zone around CIP is a very efficient way to protect surrounding people’s health. A method was designed to determine the comprehensive protection zone of CIP, taking into account multiple factors: air quality, health risk and environmental risk. By establishing a comprehensive and multi-levels index system, the protection zone and the corresponding environmental risk management countermeasures can be proposed hierarchically, which are very important to the development and environmental risk management of CIP. A CIP located in coastal area of Shandong Province was studied, and it is turned out that the method to determine the protection zone of chemical industrial park considering air quality, health risk and environmental risk has great advantages compared with other methods.


Protection zone Air quality Health risk Environmental risk Multi-levels index system 



This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21307166).


  1. Cheng, J. P., Yuan, T., Wu, Q., Zhao, W. C., Xie, H. Y., Ma, Y. G., et al. (2007). PM10-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and cancer risk estimation in the atmosphere surrounding an industrial area of Shanghai, China. Water Air Soil Pollution, 183, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ding, J. S., & Hua, W. Q. (2012). Featured chemical industrial parks in China: History, current status and outlook. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 63, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Han, L., Song, Y. H., Duan, L., & Yuan, P. (2015). Risk assessment methodology for Shenyang Chemical Industrial Park based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Environmental Earth Science, 73, 5185–5192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Li, P. Y., Wu, J. H., Qian, H., Lyu, X. S., & Liu, H. W. (2014). Origin and assessment of groundwater pollution and associated health risk: A case study in an industrial park, northwest China. Environmental Geochemistry Health, 36, 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ma, Y. K., Egodawatta, P., McGree, J., Liu, A., & Goonetilleke, A. (2016). Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in urban stormwater. Science of the Total Environment, 557–558, 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Meng, X. J., Zhang, Y., Yu, X. Y., Bai, J. H., Chai, Y. Y., & Li, Y. T. (2014). Regional environmental risk assessment for the Nanjing Chemical Industry Park: An analysis based on information-diffusion theory. Stochastic Environmental Research Risk Assessment, 28, 2217–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Reniers, G., & Amyotte, P. (2012). Prevention in the chemical and process industries: Future directions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sengupta, A., Bandyopadhyay, D., Westen, C. J. V., & Veen, A. V. D. (2016). An evaluation of risk assessment framework for industrial accidents in India. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 41, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang, L. J., Lu, X. W., Ren, C. H., Li, X. X., & Chen, C. C. (2014). Contamination assessment and health risk of heavy metals in dust from Changqing industrial park of Baoji, NW China. Environmental Earth Science, 71, 2095–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang, D. C., Wang, J., Cao, J., Dong, X. G., & Liu, H. B. (2009). Comparative study on technology methods determining atmospheric environment and hygienic prevention distance. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 25(4), 66–71. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. Xia, L. S., & Du, H. G. (2010). Brief analysis on the atmospheric environment and hygienic protection distances. Petrochemical Safety and Environmental Protection Technology, 27(3), 48–54. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. Xiang, A. L., Zhang, L., Wu, L., Mei, Y., Zhu, C. C., & Ye, F. L. (2012). Comparison of health protection zone and atmospheric environment protection zone for sintering industry. Journal of Public Health and Prevention, 23(2), 11–14. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Xin, J., Lang, Y. H., Fu, Y. P., & Li, Y. (2010). Discussion on the distinction between atmospheric environment protection zone and health protection zone and its application. Environmental Protection Science, 36(3), 105–108. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Xu, L. Y., Shu, X., & Hollert, H. (2016). Aggregate risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from dust in an urban human settlement environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yune, J. H., Tian, J. P., Liu, W., Chen, L. J., & Descamps-Large, C. (2016). Greening Chinese chemical industrial park by implementing industrial ecology strategies: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang, Y. Y., Ji, X. T., Ku, T. T., Li, G. K., & Sang, N. (2016). Heavy metals bound to fine particulate matter from northern China induce season-dependent health risks: A study based on myocardial toxicity. Environmental Pollution, 216, 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Development Centre of Ministry of Environmental Protection of ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Environmental and Energy EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations