Abstract
Strategies for improving human health in contaminated situations have traditionally been based on restricting emissions, remedial reduction of exposure and, where appropriate and possible, medical reconnaissance of efficacy. We review these and the broader aspects of general public health approaches, including necessary understanding of epidemiology and the wider social context, before considering a specific local case study involving health issues associated with chromium-contaminated land and its remediation in an area of urban regeneration. The impact of remediation upon the common good, in its broadest environmental, health and socio-economic sense, including enhanced opportunities for members of the community to take personal responsibility for health-improving activities, should be taken into account in addition to conventional theoretical assessments and practical measurements of relief from environmental risk. Rapidly emerging toxicogenomic technologies may have a role to play in informing future risk assessment and remediation approaches in contaminated situations, although the ethical challenges of using personal genetic information could well be considerable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson, M. R., Rattan, N. S., & Bidstrup, L. (1981). Health of workmen in the chromate-producing industry in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38, 117–124.
Bennet, P., & Claman, K. (1999). Risk communication and public health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brustad, M., Sandanger, T. M., Nieboer, E., & Lund, E. (2008). 10th Anniversary Review: When healthy food becomes polluted—implications for public health and dietary advice. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10, 422–427.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
Chappell, W. R., Abernathy, C. O., Calderon, R. L., & Thomas, D. J. (Eds.). (2003). Arsenic exposure and health effects V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Christie, D. A., & Tansey, E. M. (Eds.). (2004). Environmental toxicology: The legacy of silent spring. Wellcome witnesses to twentieth century medicine (Vol. 19). London, UK: Wellcome Trust Centre.
Cohen, M. D., Kargacin, B., Klein, C. B., & Costa, M. (1993). Mechanisms of chromium carcinogenicity and toxicity. Critical Reviews of Toxicology, 23, 255–281.
Colbourn, T., Dumanoski, D., & Myers, J. P. (1996). Our stolen future: Are we threatening our fertility, intelligence and survival?. London, UK: Little, Brown and Co.
Collins, F. S., Gray, G. M., & Bucher, J. R. (2008). Transforming environmental health protection. Science, 319, 906–907.
Cone, M. (2004). Silent snow: The slow poisoning of the Arctic. New York, USA: Grove Press.
Costa, M., Zhitkovich, A., Toniolo, P., Taioli, E., Popov, T., & Lukanova, A. (1996). Monitoring human lymphocytic DNA-protein cross-links as biomarkers of biologically active doses of chromate. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104. Supplement, 5, 917–919.
Couzin, J. (2008). With new disease genes, a bounty of questions. Science, 319, 1754–1755.
Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute of Futures Studies.
Davis, D. (2002). When smoke ran like water. New York, USA: Basic Books.
DEFRA, & Environment Agency . (2002). The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA): Technical basis and algorithms. R & D Publication CLR 10. Bristol, UK: Environment Agency.
Depledge, M. H., & Carlarne, C. P. (2008). Environmental rights and wrongs. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 990–994.
Eizaguirre-García, D., Rodríguez-Andrés, C., Watt, G. C., & Hole, D. (1999). A study of leukaemia in Glasgow in connection with chromium-contaminated land. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21, 435–438.
Eizaguirre-García, D., Rodríguez-Andrés, C., & Watt, G. C. (2000). Congenital anomalies in Glasgow between 1982 and 1989 and chromium waste. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22, 54–58.
Farmer, J. G., Graham, M. C., Thomas, R. P., Licona-Manzur, C., Paterson, E., Campbell, C. D., et al. (1999). Assessment and modelling of the environmental chemistry and potential for remediative treatment of chromium-contaminated land. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 21, 331–337.
Farmer, J. G., Hillier, S., Lumsdon, D. G., Graham, M. C., & Bewley, R. J. F. (2008). The assessment and remediation of chromite ore processing residue at former disposal sites, Glasgow, Scotland: Current status (2007). In M. V. Khire, A. K. Alshawabkeh, & K. R. Reddy (Eds.), Geotechnics of waste management and remediation (pp. 740–747). ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication. No. 177, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.
Farmer, J. G., Paterson, E., Bewley, R. J. F., Geelhoed, J. S., Hillier, S., Meeussen, J. C. L., et al. (2006). The implications of integrated assessment and modelling studies for the future remediation of chromite ore processing residue disposal sites. Science of the Total Environment, 360, 90–97.
Graham, M. C., Farmer, J. G., Anderson, P., Paterson, E., Hillier, S. J., Lumsdon, D. G., et al. (2006). Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue. Science of the Total Environment, 364, 32–44.
Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B., et al. (2002). The precautionary principle in the 20th century: Late lessons from early warnings. London, UK: Earthscan.
Health Protection Agency. (2005). Health protection in the 21st century. Understanding the burden of disease: Preparing for the future. UK: London.
Hogue, C. (2008, January 28). Making sense of biomonitoring. Chemical & Engineering News, 52–56.
Kyle, A. D., Woodruff, T. J., & Axelred, D. A. (2006). Integrated assessment of environment and health: America’s children and the environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 447–452.
Lahl, U., & Hawxwell, K. A. (2006). REACH—the new European chemicals law. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 7115–7121.
Landrigan, P. J., Schechter, C. B., Lipton, J. M., Fahs, M. C., & Schwartz, J. (2002). Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: Estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 721–728.
Lloyd, O. L. (2000). Pollution from chrome waste. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22, 551–554.
McCarron, P., Harvey, I., Brogan, R., & Peters, T. J. (2000a). Self reported health of people in an area contaminated by chromium waste: Interview study. British Medical Journal, 320, 11–15.
McCarron, P., Harvey, I., Brogan, R., & Peters, T. J. (2000b). Letter indicates misreading of our paper on chromium waste. British Medical Journal, 321, 386.
McMichael, A. J. (2001). Human frontiers, environments and disease: Past patterns, uncertain futures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Melton, L. (2008). Playing the genes you’re dealt. Chemistry World, 5(7), 62–66.
Midgely, J., Ashton, N., Casstles, H., McNamara, J., Tocque, K., & Bellis, M. (2005). Health, environment and deprivation in the North West of England. Centre for public health. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool John Moores University.
Moffat, S., & Bhopal, R. (2000). Study on environmental hazards is flawed. British Medical Journal, 320, 1274.
Nathanail, C. P., & Bardos, R. P. (2004). Reclamation of contaminated land. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
NIEHS, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2007). Genes, environment and health initiative invests in genetic studies, environmental monitoring technologies. http://www.niehs.nih.gov/oc/news/gei.htm.
NRC, National Research Council. (2007). Applications of toxicogenomic technologies to predictive toxicology. National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu.
Omenn, G. S. (2006). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.
Patterson C. C. (1983). British mega exposures to industrial lead. In M. Rutter & R. R. Jones (Eds.), Lead versus health: Sources and effects of low level lead exposure (pp. 17–32). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Pellerin, C., & Booker, S. M. (2000). Reflections on hexavalent chromium: Health hazards of an industrial heavyweight. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108, A402–A407.
Pencheon, D., Guest, C., Melzer, D., & Muir-Gray, J. A. (2006). Oxford handbook of public health practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, D. M., Otani, J. M., Finley, B. L., Paustenbach, D. J., Bland, J. A., Speizer, N., et al. (2002). Is hexavalent chromium carcinogenic via ingestion? A weight of evidence review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, A65, 701–746.
Purohit, H. J., Raje, D. V., Kapley, A., Padmanabhan, P., & Singh, R. N. (2003). Genomics tools in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 356A–363A.
RCEP, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. (1983). Ninth report: Lead in the environment. London, UK: HMSO.
Reid, J., Jarvis, R., Richardson, J., & Stewart, A. (2005). Responding to chronic environmental problems in Cheshire & Merseyside—systems and procedures. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report, 2005(4), 33–35.
Sheldon, R. A. (2008). Why green chemistry and sustainability of resources are essential to our future. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10, 406–407.
Stern, A. H., Fagliano, J. A., Savrin, J. E., Freeman, N. C. G., & Lioy, P. J. (1998). The association of chromium in household dust with urinary chromium in residences adjacent to chromate production waste sites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106, 833–839.
Thomas, V. M., Socolow, R. H., Fanelli, J. J., & Spiro, T. G. (1999). Effects of reducing lead in gasoline. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 3942–3948.
Thornton, J. (2000). Pandora’s poison: Chlorine, health and a new environmental strategy. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Watt, G., Eizaguirre, D., Gillis, C., Hole, D., Stewart, I., Symington, I., et al. (1991). Assessment of the risk to human health from land contaminated by chromium waste. Report by the Department of Public Health. Glasgow, UK: Greater Glasgow Health Board.
World Health Organisation. (1946). Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19 June–22 July 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States. Official Records of the World Health Organization no. 2, p. 100.
Acknowledgements
This paper has arisen out of multidisciplinary discussions held at the MULTITUDE/SEGH workshop, held in June 2007 in Liverpool, UK. Participants with a wide range of expertise were brought together with the author(s) and this interpretation owes a great deal to those resultant discussions. The participants in this particular theme of the workshop included: Paul Cleary, Elisa Giubilato, James Grellier, Gibby Koshy, Paolo Luria, Iain McLellan, Theresa Mercer, Jenny O’Reilly, Ann Power, Tom Shepherd, Jacqui Thomas. The workshop was administered via a NERC grant (NE/E009484/1) and supported by The Joint Environment & Human Health Programme, supported by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra), Environment Agency (EA), Ministry of Defence (MOD), Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC), Medical Research Council (MRC), The Wellcome Trust, Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Health Protection Agency (HPA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farmer, J.G., Jarvis, R. Strategies for improving human health in contaminated situations: a review of past, present and possible future approaches. Environ Geochem Health 31, 227–238 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-008-9209-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-008-9209-2